The majority of this PR is tediously passing `end_lineno` and `end_col_offset` everywhere. Here are non-trivial points:
* It is not possible to reconstruct end positions in AST "on the fly", some information is lost after an AST node is constructed, so we need two more attributes for every AST node `end_lineno` and `end_col_offset`.
* I add end position information to both CST and AST. Although it may be technically possible to avoid adding end positions to CST, the code becomes more cumbersome and less efficient.
* Since the end position is not known for non-leaf CST nodes while the next token is added, this requires a bit of extra care (see `_PyNode_FinalizeEndPos`). Unless I made some mistake, the algorithm should be linear.
* For statements, I "trim" the end position of suites to not include the terminal newlines and dedent (this seems to be what people would expect), for example in
```python
class C:
pass
pass
```
the end line and end column for the class definition is (2, 8).
* For `end_col_offset` I use the common Python convention for indexing, for example for `pass` the `end_col_offset` is 4 (not 3), so that `[0:4]` gives one the source code that corresponds to the node.
* I added a helper function `ast.get_source_segment()`, to get source text segment corresponding to a given AST node. It is also useful for testing.
An (inevitable) downside of this PR is that AST now takes almost 25% more memory. I think however it is probably justified by the benefits.
* ast.h now includes Python-ast.h and node.h
* parsetok.h now includes node.h and grammar.h
* symtable.h now includes Python-ast.h
* Modify asdl_c.py to enhance Python-ast.h:
* Add #ifndef/#define Py_PYTHON_AST_H to be able to include the header
twice
* Add "extern { ... }" for C++
* Undefine "Yield" macro conflicting with winbase.h
* Remove "#undef Yield" from C files, it's now done in Python-ast.h
* Remove now useless includes in C files
bpo-29463 added optional "docstring" field to 4 AST types.
While it is optional, it breaks backward compatibility because AST constructor
requires number of positional argument is same to number of fields.
AST types accepts empty arguments, and incomplete keyword arguments.
But it's not big problem because field can be filled after creation, and checked when compiling.
So stop requiring complete set of fields for positional arguments too.
obj2ast_constant() code is baesd on obj2ast_object() which has a special case
for Py_None. But in practice, we don't need to have a special case for
constants.
Issue noticed by Joseph Jevnik on a review.
Issue #26146: Add a new kind of AST node: ast.Constant. It can be used by
external AST optimizers, but the compiler does not emit directly such node.
An optimizer can replace the following AST nodes with ast.Constant:
* ast.NameConstant: None, False, True
* ast.Num: int, float, complex
* ast.Str: str
* ast.Bytes: bytes
* ast.Tuple if items are constants too: tuple
* frozenset
Update code to accept ast.Constant instead of ast.Num and/or ast.Str:
* compiler
* docstrings
* ast.literal_eval()
* Tools/parser/unparse.py
The new parser does not rely on Spark (which is now removed from our repo),
uses modern 3.x idioms and is significantly smaller and simpler.
It generates exactly the same AST files (.h and .c), so in practice no builds
should be affected.
Guido van Rossum
Ivan Levkivskyi
Victor Stinner
Serhiy Storchaka
Antoine Pitrou
INADA Naoki
Yuan Chao Chou
INADA Naoki
Victor Stinner
Benjamin Peterson
Eli Bendersky
Antoine Pitrou
Ezio Melotti
Christian Heimes
Matthias Klose