2015-11-04 02:05:23 -04:00
|
|
|
NOTES FOR FUSION OF MEASUREMENTS USING AUTOCODE FRAGMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The auto-code for the fusion of the various measurements provides in most cases the observation Jacobian and Kalman gain matrix for that observation.
|
|
|
|
Where no Kalman gain is provided, it will need to be calculated using the usual K = P*transpose(H)/(H*P*transpose(H) + R) where:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K = Kalman Gain matrix
|
|
|
|
H = observation partial derivative matrix (observaton Jacobian)
|
|
|
|
R = observation variance
|
|
|
|
(H*P*transpose(H) + R) is the innovation variance (always a scalar)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the observation is a vector, it is always assumed that the errors in the vectors are uncorelated to each other and the observations are fused
|
|
|
|
sequentially, so no matrix inversion is required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is important that maximum useage of the sparsity in the H matrix be taken advantage of. If a sparse math library is available it could be used,
|
|
|
|
otherwise the matrix operations should need unrolled with inclusion of conditional statements to improve efficiency. Examples of this technique can
|
|
|
|
be found in the existing att_pos_ekf_estimator library
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTES FOR COVARIANCE PREDICTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only expression for the upper diagonal is provided. The values will need to be copied across to the lower diagnal elements assuming symmetry
|
|
|
|
Process noise for time invariant states, eg Gyro bias, has not been included in the auto-code. The process noise variance for these states will
|
2016-05-01 03:22:23 -03:00
|
|
|
need to be added in a separate operation.
|