bpo-34013: Don't consider a grouped expression when reporting legacy print syntax errors (GH-27521)

This commit is contained in:
Pablo Galindo Salgado 2021-08-01 02:10:50 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent b08c48e617
commit 208a7e957b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
3 changed files with 17 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ expression_without_invalid[expr_ty]:
| disjunction
| lambdef
invalid_legacy_expression:
| a=NAME b=star_expressions {
| a=NAME !'(' b=star_expressions {
_PyPegen_check_legacy_stmt(p, a) ? RAISE_SYNTAX_ERROR_KNOWN_RANGE(a, b,
"Missing parentheses in call to '%U'. Did you mean %U(...)?", a->v.Name.id, a->v.Name.id) : NULL}

View File

@ -182,6 +182,15 @@ class ExceptionTests(unittest.TestCase):
s = 'exec f(a+b,c)'
ckmsg(s, "Missing parentheses in call to 'exec'. Did you mean exec(...)?")
# Check that we don't incorrectly identify '(...)' as an expression to the right
# of 'print'
s = 'print (a+b,c) $ 42'
ckmsg(s, "invalid syntax")
s = 'exec (a+b,c) $ 42'
ckmsg(s, "invalid syntax")
# should not apply to subclasses, see issue #31161
s = '''if True:\nprint "No indent"'''
ckmsg(s, "expected an indented block after 'if' statement on line 1", IndentationError)

View File

@ -18158,7 +18158,7 @@ expression_without_invalid_rule(Parser *p)
return _res;
}
// invalid_legacy_expression: NAME star_expressions
// invalid_legacy_expression: NAME !'(' star_expressions
static void *
invalid_legacy_expression_rule(Parser *p)
{
@ -18169,21 +18169,23 @@ invalid_legacy_expression_rule(Parser *p)
}
void * _res = NULL;
int _mark = p->mark;
{ // NAME star_expressions
{ // NAME !'(' star_expressions
if (p->error_indicator) {
D(p->level--);
return NULL;
}
D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c> invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME star_expressions"));
D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c> invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME !'(' star_expressions"));
expr_ty a;
expr_ty b;
if (
(a = _PyPegen_name_token(p)) // NAME
&&
_PyPegen_lookahead_with_int(0, _PyPegen_expect_token, p, 7) // token='('
&&
(b = star_expressions_rule(p)) // star_expressions
)
{
D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c+ invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s succeeded!\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME star_expressions"));
D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c+ invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s succeeded!\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME !'(' star_expressions"));
_res = _PyPegen_check_legacy_stmt ( p , a ) ? RAISE_SYNTAX_ERROR_KNOWN_RANGE ( a , b , "Missing parentheses in call to '%U'. Did you mean %U(...)?" , a -> v . Name . id , a -> v . Name . id ) : NULL;
if (_res == NULL && PyErr_Occurred()) {
p->error_indicator = 1;
@ -18194,7 +18196,7 @@ invalid_legacy_expression_rule(Parser *p)
}
p->mark = _mark;
D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c%s invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s failed!\n", p->level, ' ',
p->error_indicator ? "ERROR!" : "-", _mark, p->mark, "NAME star_expressions"));
p->error_indicator ? "ERROR!" : "-", _mark, p->mark, "NAME !'(' star_expressions"));
}
_res = NULL;
done: