From 208a7e957b812ad3b3733791845447677a704f3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pablo Galindo Salgado Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 02:10:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] bpo-34013: Don't consider a grouped expression when reporting legacy print syntax errors (GH-27521) --- Grammar/python.gram | 2 +- Lib/test/test_exceptions.py | 9 +++++++++ Parser/parser.c | 12 +++++++----- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/Grammar/python.gram b/Grammar/python.gram index 278ddfb2d1a..8a21056d2a8 100644 --- a/Grammar/python.gram +++ b/Grammar/python.gram @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ expression_without_invalid[expr_ty]: | disjunction | lambdef invalid_legacy_expression: - | a=NAME b=star_expressions { + | a=NAME !'(' b=star_expressions { _PyPegen_check_legacy_stmt(p, a) ? RAISE_SYNTAX_ERROR_KNOWN_RANGE(a, b, "Missing parentheses in call to '%U'. Did you mean %U(...)?", a->v.Name.id, a->v.Name.id) : NULL} diff --git a/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py b/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py index 8ea415f45a6..b280cfea435 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_exceptions.py @@ -182,6 +182,15 @@ class ExceptionTests(unittest.TestCase): s = 'exec f(a+b,c)' ckmsg(s, "Missing parentheses in call to 'exec'. Did you mean exec(...)?") + # Check that we don't incorrectly identify '(...)' as an expression to the right + # of 'print' + + s = 'print (a+b,c) $ 42' + ckmsg(s, "invalid syntax") + + s = 'exec (a+b,c) $ 42' + ckmsg(s, "invalid syntax") + # should not apply to subclasses, see issue #31161 s = '''if True:\nprint "No indent"''' ckmsg(s, "expected an indented block after 'if' statement on line 1", IndentationError) diff --git a/Parser/parser.c b/Parser/parser.c index c05fc31c243..7a106a437bc 100644 --- a/Parser/parser.c +++ b/Parser/parser.c @@ -18158,7 +18158,7 @@ expression_without_invalid_rule(Parser *p) return _res; } -// invalid_legacy_expression: NAME star_expressions +// invalid_legacy_expression: NAME !'(' star_expressions static void * invalid_legacy_expression_rule(Parser *p) { @@ -18169,21 +18169,23 @@ invalid_legacy_expression_rule(Parser *p) } void * _res = NULL; int _mark = p->mark; - { // NAME star_expressions + { // NAME !'(' star_expressions if (p->error_indicator) { D(p->level--); return NULL; } - D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c> invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME star_expressions")); + D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c> invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME !'(' star_expressions")); expr_ty a; expr_ty b; if ( (a = _PyPegen_name_token(p)) // NAME && + _PyPegen_lookahead_with_int(0, _PyPegen_expect_token, p, 7) // token='(' + && (b = star_expressions_rule(p)) // star_expressions ) { - D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c+ invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s succeeded!\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME star_expressions")); + D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c+ invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s succeeded!\n", p->level, ' ', _mark, p->mark, "NAME !'(' star_expressions")); _res = _PyPegen_check_legacy_stmt ( p , a ) ? RAISE_SYNTAX_ERROR_KNOWN_RANGE ( a , b , "Missing parentheses in call to '%U'. Did you mean %U(...)?" , a -> v . Name . id , a -> v . Name . id ) : NULL; if (_res == NULL && PyErr_Occurred()) { p->error_indicator = 1; @@ -18194,7 +18196,7 @@ invalid_legacy_expression_rule(Parser *p) } p->mark = _mark; D(fprintf(stderr, "%*c%s invalid_legacy_expression[%d-%d]: %s failed!\n", p->level, ' ', - p->error_indicator ? "ERROR!" : "-", _mark, p->mark, "NAME star_expressions")); + p->error_indicator ? "ERROR!" : "-", _mark, p->mark, "NAME !'(' star_expressions")); } _res = NULL; done: