1384 lines
61 KiB
ReStructuredText
1384 lines
61 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _regex-howto:
|
||
|
||
****************************
|
||
Regular Expression HOWTO
|
||
****************************
|
||
|
||
:Author: A.M. Kuchling <amk@amk.ca>
|
||
|
||
.. TODO:
|
||
Document lookbehind assertions
|
||
Better way of displaying a RE, a string, and what it matches
|
||
Mention optional argument to match.groups()
|
||
Unicode (at least a reference)
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. topic:: Abstract
|
||
|
||
This document is an introductory tutorial to using regular expressions in Python
|
||
with the :mod:`re` module. It provides a gentler introduction than the
|
||
corresponding section in the Library Reference.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Introduction
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
Regular expressions (called REs, or regexes, or regex patterns) are essentially
|
||
a tiny, highly specialized programming language embedded inside Python and made
|
||
available through the :mod:`re` module. Using this little language, you specify
|
||
the rules for the set of possible strings that you want to match; this set might
|
||
contain English sentences, or e-mail addresses, or TeX commands, or anything you
|
||
like. You can then ask questions such as "Does this string match the pattern?",
|
||
or "Is there a match for the pattern anywhere in this string?". You can also
|
||
use REs to modify a string or to split it apart in various ways.
|
||
|
||
Regular expression patterns are compiled into a series of bytecodes which are
|
||
then executed by a matching engine written in C. For advanced use, it may be
|
||
necessary to pay careful attention to how the engine will execute a given RE,
|
||
and write the RE in a certain way in order to produce bytecode that runs faster.
|
||
Optimization isn't covered in this document, because it requires that you have a
|
||
good understanding of the matching engine's internals.
|
||
|
||
The regular expression language is relatively small and restricted, so not all
|
||
possible string processing tasks can be done using regular expressions. There
|
||
are also tasks that *can* be done with regular expressions, but the expressions
|
||
turn out to be very complicated. In these cases, you may be better off writing
|
||
Python code to do the processing; while Python code will be slower than an
|
||
elaborate regular expression, it will also probably be more understandable.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Simple Patterns
|
||
===============
|
||
|
||
We'll start by learning about the simplest possible regular expressions. Since
|
||
regular expressions are used to operate on strings, we'll begin with the most
|
||
common task: matching characters.
|
||
|
||
For a detailed explanation of the computer science underlying regular
|
||
expressions (deterministic and non-deterministic finite automata), you can refer
|
||
to almost any textbook on writing compilers.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Matching Characters
|
||
-------------------
|
||
|
||
Most letters and characters will simply match themselves. For example, the
|
||
regular expression ``test`` will match the string ``test`` exactly. (You can
|
||
enable a case-insensitive mode that would let this RE match ``Test`` or ``TEST``
|
||
as well; more about this later.)
|
||
|
||
There are exceptions to this rule; some characters are special
|
||
:dfn:`metacharacters`, and don't match themselves. Instead, they signal that
|
||
some out-of-the-ordinary thing should be matched, or they affect other portions
|
||
of the RE by repeating them or changing their meaning. Much of this document is
|
||
devoted to discussing various metacharacters and what they do.
|
||
|
||
Here's a complete list of the metacharacters; their meanings will be discussed
|
||
in the rest of this HOWTO.
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: none
|
||
|
||
. ^ $ * + ? { } [ ] \ | ( )
|
||
|
||
The first metacharacters we'll look at are ``[`` and ``]``. They're used for
|
||
specifying a character class, which is a set of characters that you wish to
|
||
match. Characters can be listed individually, or a range of characters can be
|
||
indicated by giving two characters and separating them by a ``'-'``. For
|
||
example, ``[abc]`` will match any of the characters ``a``, ``b``, or ``c``; this
|
||
is the same as ``[a-c]``, which uses a range to express the same set of
|
||
characters. If you wanted to match only lowercase letters, your RE would be
|
||
``[a-z]``.
|
||
|
||
Metacharacters are not active inside classes. For example, ``[akm$]`` will
|
||
match any of the characters ``'a'``, ``'k'``, ``'m'``, or ``'$'``; ``'$'`` is
|
||
usually a metacharacter, but inside a character class it's stripped of its
|
||
special nature.
|
||
|
||
You can match the characters not listed within the class by :dfn:`complementing`
|
||
the set. This is indicated by including a ``'^'`` as the first character of the
|
||
class; ``'^'`` outside a character class will simply match the ``'^'``
|
||
character. For example, ``[^5]`` will match any character except ``'5'``.
|
||
|
||
Perhaps the most important metacharacter is the backslash, ``\``. As in Python
|
||
string literals, the backslash can be followed by various characters to signal
|
||
various special sequences. It's also used to escape all the metacharacters so
|
||
you can still match them in patterns; for example, if you need to match a ``[``
|
||
or ``\``, you can precede them with a backslash to remove their special
|
||
meaning: ``\[`` or ``\\``.
|
||
|
||
Some of the special sequences beginning with ``'\'`` represent
|
||
predefined sets of characters that are often useful, such as the set
|
||
of digits, the set of letters, or the set of anything that isn't
|
||
whitespace.
|
||
|
||
Let's take an example: ``\w`` matches any alphanumeric character. If
|
||
the regex pattern is expressed in bytes, this is equivalent to the
|
||
class ``[a-zA-Z0-9_]``. If the regex pattern is a string, ``\w`` will
|
||
match all the characters marked as letters in the Unicode database
|
||
provided by the :mod:`unicodedata` module. You can use the more
|
||
restricted definition of ``\w`` in a string pattern by supplying the
|
||
:const:`re.ASCII` flag when compiling the regular expression.
|
||
|
||
The following list of special sequences isn't complete. For a complete
|
||
list of sequences and expanded class definitions for Unicode string
|
||
patterns, see the last part of :ref:`Regular Expression Syntax
|
||
<re-syntax>` in the Standard Library reference. In general, the
|
||
Unicode versions match any character that's in the appropriate
|
||
category in the Unicode database.
|
||
|
||
``\d``
|
||
Matches any decimal digit; this is equivalent to the class ``[0-9]``.
|
||
|
||
``\D``
|
||
Matches any non-digit character; this is equivalent to the class ``[^0-9]``.
|
||
|
||
``\s``
|
||
Matches any whitespace character; this is equivalent to the class ``[
|
||
\t\n\r\f\v]``.
|
||
|
||
``\S``
|
||
Matches any non-whitespace character; this is equivalent to the class ``[^
|
||
\t\n\r\f\v]``.
|
||
|
||
``\w``
|
||
Matches any alphanumeric character; this is equivalent to the class
|
||
``[a-zA-Z0-9_]``.
|
||
|
||
``\W``
|
||
Matches any non-alphanumeric character; this is equivalent to the class
|
||
``[^a-zA-Z0-9_]``.
|
||
|
||
These sequences can be included inside a character class. For example,
|
||
``[\s,.]`` is a character class that will match any whitespace character, or
|
||
``','`` or ``'.'``.
|
||
|
||
The final metacharacter in this section is ``.``. It matches anything except a
|
||
newline character, and there's an alternate mode (:const:`re.DOTALL`) where it will
|
||
match even a newline. ``.`` is often used where you want to match "any
|
||
character".
|
||
|
||
|
||
Repeating Things
|
||
----------------
|
||
|
||
Being able to match varying sets of characters is the first thing regular
|
||
expressions can do that isn't already possible with the methods available on
|
||
strings. However, if that was the only additional capability of regexes, they
|
||
wouldn't be much of an advance. Another capability is that you can specify that
|
||
portions of the RE must be repeated a certain number of times.
|
||
|
||
The first metacharacter for repeating things that we'll look at is ``*``. ``*``
|
||
doesn't match the literal character ``'*'``; instead, it specifies that the
|
||
previous character can be matched zero or more times, instead of exactly once.
|
||
|
||
For example, ``ca*t`` will match ``'ct'`` (0 ``'a'`` characters), ``'cat'`` (1 ``'a'``),
|
||
``'caaat'`` (3 ``'a'`` characters), and so forth.
|
||
|
||
Repetitions such as ``*`` are :dfn:`greedy`; when repeating a RE, the matching
|
||
engine will try to repeat it as many times as possible. If later portions of the
|
||
pattern don't match, the matching engine will then back up and try again with
|
||
fewer repetitions.
|
||
|
||
A step-by-step example will make this more obvious. Let's consider the
|
||
expression ``a[bcd]*b``. This matches the letter ``'a'``, zero or more letters
|
||
from the class ``[bcd]``, and finally ends with a ``'b'``. Now imagine matching
|
||
this RE against the string ``'abcbd'``.
|
||
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
| Step | Matched | Explanation |
|
||
+======+===========+=================================+
|
||
| 1 | ``a`` | The ``a`` in the RE matches. |
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
| 2 | ``abcbd`` | The engine matches ``[bcd]*``, |
|
||
| | | going as far as it can, which |
|
||
| | | is to the end of the string. |
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
| 3 | *Failure* | The engine tries to match |
|
||
| | | ``b``, but the current position |
|
||
| | | is at the end of the string, so |
|
||
| | | it fails. |
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
| 4 | ``abcb`` | Back up, so that ``[bcd]*`` |
|
||
| | | matches one less character. |
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
| 5 | *Failure* | Try ``b`` again, but the |
|
||
| | | current position is at the last |
|
||
| | | character, which is a ``'d'``. |
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
| 6 | ``abc`` | Back up again, so that |
|
||
| | | ``[bcd]*`` is only matching |
|
||
| | | ``bc``. |
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
| 6 | ``abcb`` | Try ``b`` again. This time |
|
||
| | | the character at the |
|
||
| | | current position is ``'b'``, so |
|
||
| | | it succeeds. |
|
||
+------+-----------+---------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
The end of the RE has now been reached, and it has matched ``'abcb'``. This
|
||
demonstrates how the matching engine goes as far as it can at first, and if no
|
||
match is found it will then progressively back up and retry the rest of the RE
|
||
again and again. It will back up until it has tried zero matches for
|
||
``[bcd]*``, and if that subsequently fails, the engine will conclude that the
|
||
string doesn't match the RE at all.
|
||
|
||
Another repeating metacharacter is ``+``, which matches one or more times. Pay
|
||
careful attention to the difference between ``*`` and ``+``; ``*`` matches
|
||
*zero* or more times, so whatever's being repeated may not be present at all,
|
||
while ``+`` requires at least *one* occurrence. To use a similar example,
|
||
``ca+t`` will match ``'cat'`` (1 ``'a'``), ``'caaat'`` (3 ``'a'``\ s), but won't
|
||
match ``'ct'``.
|
||
|
||
There are two more repeating qualifiers. The question mark character, ``?``,
|
||
matches either once or zero times; you can think of it as marking something as
|
||
being optional. For example, ``home-?brew`` matches either ``'homebrew'`` or
|
||
``'home-brew'``.
|
||
|
||
The most complicated repeated qualifier is ``{m,n}``, where *m* and *n* are
|
||
decimal integers. This qualifier means there must be at least *m* repetitions,
|
||
and at most *n*. For example, ``a/{1,3}b`` will match ``'a/b'``, ``'a//b'``, and
|
||
``'a///b'``. It won't match ``'ab'``, which has no slashes, or ``'a////b'``, which
|
||
has four.
|
||
|
||
You can omit either *m* or *n*; in that case, a reasonable value is assumed for
|
||
the missing value. Omitting *m* is interpreted as a lower limit of 0, while
|
||
omitting *n* results in an upper bound of infinity.
|
||
|
||
Readers of a reductionist bent may notice that the three other qualifiers can
|
||
all be expressed using this notation. ``{0,}`` is the same as ``*``, ``{1,}``
|
||
is equivalent to ``+``, and ``{0,1}`` is the same as ``?``. It's better to use
|
||
``*``, ``+``, or ``?`` when you can, simply because they're shorter and easier
|
||
to read.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Using Regular Expressions
|
||
=========================
|
||
|
||
Now that we've looked at some simple regular expressions, how do we actually use
|
||
them in Python? The :mod:`re` module provides an interface to the regular
|
||
expression engine, allowing you to compile REs into objects and then perform
|
||
matches with them.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Compiling Regular Expressions
|
||
-----------------------------
|
||
|
||
Regular expressions are compiled into pattern objects, which have
|
||
methods for various operations such as searching for pattern matches or
|
||
performing string substitutions. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> import re
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('ab*')
|
||
>>> p
|
||
re.compile('ab*')
|
||
|
||
:func:`re.compile` also accepts an optional *flags* argument, used to enable
|
||
various special features and syntax variations. We'll go over the available
|
||
settings later, but for now a single example will do::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('ab*', re.IGNORECASE)
|
||
|
||
The RE is passed to :func:`re.compile` as a string. REs are handled as strings
|
||
because regular expressions aren't part of the core Python language, and no
|
||
special syntax was created for expressing them. (There are applications that
|
||
don't need REs at all, so there's no need to bloat the language specification by
|
||
including them.) Instead, the :mod:`re` module is simply a C extension module
|
||
included with Python, just like the :mod:`socket` or :mod:`zlib` modules.
|
||
|
||
Putting REs in strings keeps the Python language simpler, but has one
|
||
disadvantage which is the topic of the next section.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. _the-backslash-plague:
|
||
|
||
The Backslash Plague
|
||
--------------------
|
||
|
||
As stated earlier, regular expressions use the backslash character (``'\'``) to
|
||
indicate special forms or to allow special characters to be used without
|
||
invoking their special meaning. This conflicts with Python's usage of the same
|
||
character for the same purpose in string literals.
|
||
|
||
Let's say you want to write a RE that matches the string ``\section``, which
|
||
might be found in a LaTeX file. To figure out what to write in the program
|
||
code, start with the desired string to be matched. Next, you must escape any
|
||
backslashes and other metacharacters by preceding them with a backslash,
|
||
resulting in the string ``\\section``. The resulting string that must be passed
|
||
to :func:`re.compile` must be ``\\section``. However, to express this as a
|
||
Python string literal, both backslashes must be escaped *again*.
|
||
|
||
+-------------------+------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Characters | Stage |
|
||
+===================+==========================================+
|
||
| ``\section`` | Text string to be matched |
|
||
+-------------------+------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``\\section`` | Escaped backslash for :func:`re.compile` |
|
||
+-------------------+------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``"\\\\section"`` | Escaped backslashes for a string literal |
|
||
+-------------------+------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
In short, to match a literal backslash, one has to write ``'\\\\'`` as the RE
|
||
string, because the regular expression must be ``\\``, and each backslash must
|
||
be expressed as ``\\`` inside a regular Python string literal. In REs that
|
||
feature backslashes repeatedly, this leads to lots of repeated backslashes and
|
||
makes the resulting strings difficult to understand.
|
||
|
||
The solution is to use Python's raw string notation for regular expressions;
|
||
backslashes are not handled in any special way in a string literal prefixed with
|
||
``'r'``, so ``r"\n"`` is a two-character string containing ``'\'`` and ``'n'``,
|
||
while ``"\n"`` is a one-character string containing a newline. Regular
|
||
expressions will often be written in Python code using this raw string notation.
|
||
|
||
In addition, special escape sequences that are valid in regular expressions,
|
||
but not valid as Python string literals, now result in a
|
||
:exc:`DeprecationWarning` and will eventually become a :exc:`SyntaxError`,
|
||
which means the sequences will be invalid if raw string notation or escaping
|
||
the backslashes isn't used.
|
||
|
||
|
||
+-------------------+------------------+
|
||
| Regular String | Raw string |
|
||
+===================+==================+
|
||
| ``"ab*"`` | ``r"ab*"`` |
|
||
+-------------------+------------------+
|
||
| ``"\\\\section"`` | ``r"\\section"`` |
|
||
+-------------------+------------------+
|
||
| ``"\\w+\\s+\\1"`` | ``r"\w+\s+\1"`` |
|
||
+-------------------+------------------+
|
||
|
||
|
||
Performing Matches
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
Once you have an object representing a compiled regular expression, what do you
|
||
do with it? Pattern objects have several methods and attributes.
|
||
Only the most significant ones will be covered here; consult the :mod:`re` docs
|
||
for a complete listing.
|
||
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Method/Attribute | Purpose |
|
||
+==================+===============================================+
|
||
| ``match()`` | Determine if the RE matches at the beginning |
|
||
| | of the string. |
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``search()`` | Scan through a string, looking for any |
|
||
| | location where this RE matches. |
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``findall()`` | Find all substrings where the RE matches, and |
|
||
| | returns them as a list. |
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``finditer()`` | Find all substrings where the RE matches, and |
|
||
| | returns them as an :term:`iterator`. |
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
:meth:`~re.Pattern.match` and :meth:`~re.Pattern.search` return ``None`` if no match can be found. If
|
||
they're successful, a :ref:`match object <match-objects>` instance is returned,
|
||
containing information about the match: where it starts and ends, the substring
|
||
it matched, and more.
|
||
|
||
You can learn about this by interactively experimenting with the :mod:`re`
|
||
module. If you have :mod:`tkinter` available, you may also want to look at
|
||
:source:`Tools/demo/redemo.py`, a demonstration program included with the
|
||
Python distribution. It allows you to enter REs and strings, and displays
|
||
whether the RE matches or fails. :file:`redemo.py` can be quite useful when
|
||
trying to debug a complicated RE.
|
||
|
||
This HOWTO uses the standard Python interpreter for its examples. First, run the
|
||
Python interpreter, import the :mod:`re` module, and compile a RE::
|
||
|
||
>>> import re
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('[a-z]+')
|
||
>>> p
|
||
re.compile('[a-z]+')
|
||
|
||
Now, you can try matching various strings against the RE ``[a-z]+``. An empty
|
||
string shouldn't match at all, since ``+`` means 'one or more repetitions'.
|
||
:meth:`~re.Pattern.match` should return ``None`` in this case, which will cause the
|
||
interpreter to print no output. You can explicitly print the result of
|
||
:meth:`!match` to make this clear. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p.match("")
|
||
>>> print(p.match(""))
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
Now, let's try it on a string that it should match, such as ``tempo``. In this
|
||
case, :meth:`~re.Pattern.match` will return a :ref:`match object <match-objects>`, so you
|
||
should store the result in a variable for later use. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> m = p.match('tempo')
|
||
>>> m
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(0, 5), match='tempo'>
|
||
|
||
Now you can query the :ref:`match object <match-objects>` for information
|
||
about the matching string. Match object instances
|
||
also have several methods and attributes; the most important ones are:
|
||
|
||
+------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Method/Attribute | Purpose |
|
||
+==================+============================================+
|
||
| ``group()`` | Return the string matched by the RE |
|
||
+------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``start()`` | Return the starting position of the match |
|
||
+------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``end()`` | Return the ending position of the match |
|
||
+------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``span()`` | Return a tuple containing the (start, end) |
|
||
| | positions of the match |
|
||
+------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
Trying these methods will soon clarify their meaning::
|
||
|
||
>>> m.group()
|
||
'tempo'
|
||
>>> m.start(), m.end()
|
||
(0, 5)
|
||
>>> m.span()
|
||
(0, 5)
|
||
|
||
:meth:`~re.Match.group` returns the substring that was matched by the RE. :meth:`~re.Match.start`
|
||
and :meth:`~re.Match.end` return the starting and ending index of the match. :meth:`~re.Match.span`
|
||
returns both start and end indexes in a single tuple. Since the :meth:`~re.Pattern.match`
|
||
method only checks if the RE matches at the start of a string, :meth:`!start`
|
||
will always be zero. However, the :meth:`~re.Pattern.search` method of patterns
|
||
scans through the string, so the match may not start at zero in that
|
||
case. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> print(p.match('::: message'))
|
||
None
|
||
>>> m = p.search('::: message'); print(m)
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(4, 11), match='message'>
|
||
>>> m.group()
|
||
'message'
|
||
>>> m.span()
|
||
(4, 11)
|
||
|
||
In actual programs, the most common style is to store the
|
||
:ref:`match object <match-objects>` in a variable, and then check if it was
|
||
``None``. This usually looks like::
|
||
|
||
p = re.compile( ... )
|
||
m = p.match( 'string goes here' )
|
||
if m:
|
||
print('Match found: ', m.group())
|
||
else:
|
||
print('No match')
|
||
|
||
Two pattern methods return all of the matches for a pattern.
|
||
:meth:`~re.Pattern.findall` returns a list of matching strings::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'\d+')
|
||
>>> p.findall('12 drummers drumming, 11 pipers piping, 10 lords a-leaping')
|
||
['12', '11', '10']
|
||
|
||
The ``r`` prefix, making the literal a raw string literal, is needed in this
|
||
example because escape sequences in a normal "cooked" string literal that are
|
||
not recognized by Python, as opposed to regular expressions, now result in a
|
||
:exc:`DeprecationWarning` and will eventually become a :exc:`SyntaxError`. See
|
||
:ref:`the-backslash-plague`.
|
||
|
||
:meth:`~re.Pattern.findall` has to create the entire list before it can be returned as the
|
||
result. The :meth:`~re.Pattern.finditer` method returns a sequence of
|
||
:ref:`match object <match-objects>` instances as an :term:`iterator`::
|
||
|
||
>>> iterator = p.finditer('12 drummers drumming, 11 ... 10 ...')
|
||
>>> iterator #doctest: +ELLIPSIS
|
||
<callable_iterator object at 0x...>
|
||
>>> for match in iterator:
|
||
... print(match.span())
|
||
...
|
||
(0, 2)
|
||
(22, 24)
|
||
(29, 31)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Module-Level Functions
|
||
----------------------
|
||
|
||
You don't have to create a pattern object and call its methods; the
|
||
:mod:`re` module also provides top-level functions called :func:`~re.match`,
|
||
:func:`~re.search`, :func:`~re.findall`, :func:`~re.sub`, and so forth. These functions
|
||
take the same arguments as the corresponding pattern method with
|
||
the RE string added as the first argument, and still return either ``None`` or a
|
||
:ref:`match object <match-objects>` instance. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> print(re.match(r'From\s+', 'Fromage amk'))
|
||
None
|
||
>>> re.match(r'From\s+', 'From amk Thu May 14 19:12:10 1998') #doctest: +ELLIPSIS
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(0, 5), match='From '>
|
||
|
||
Under the hood, these functions simply create a pattern object for you
|
||
and call the appropriate method on it. They also store the compiled
|
||
object in a cache, so future calls using the same RE won't need to
|
||
parse the pattern again and again.
|
||
|
||
Should you use these module-level functions, or should you get the
|
||
pattern and call its methods yourself? If you're accessing a regex
|
||
within a loop, pre-compiling it will save a few function calls.
|
||
Outside of loops, there's not much difference thanks to the internal
|
||
cache.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Compilation Flags
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
Compilation flags let you modify some aspects of how regular expressions work.
|
||
Flags are available in the :mod:`re` module under two names, a long name such as
|
||
:const:`IGNORECASE` and a short, one-letter form such as :const:`I`. (If you're
|
||
familiar with Perl's pattern modifiers, the one-letter forms use the same
|
||
letters; the short form of :const:`re.VERBOSE` is :const:`re.X`, for example.)
|
||
Multiple flags can be specified by bitwise OR-ing them; ``re.I | re.M`` sets
|
||
both the :const:`I` and :const:`M` flags, for example.
|
||
|
||
Here's a table of the available flags, followed by a more detailed explanation
|
||
of each one.
|
||
|
||
+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Flag | Meaning |
|
||
+=================================+============================================+
|
||
| :const:`ASCII`, :const:`A` | Makes several escapes like ``\w``, ``\b``, |
|
||
| | ``\s`` and ``\d`` match only on ASCII |
|
||
| | characters with the respective property. |
|
||
+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| :const:`DOTALL`, :const:`S` | Make ``.`` match any character, including |
|
||
| | newlines. |
|
||
+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| :const:`IGNORECASE`, :const:`I` | Do case-insensitive matches. |
|
||
+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| :const:`LOCALE`, :const:`L` | Do a locale-aware match. |
|
||
+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| :const:`MULTILINE`, :const:`M` | Multi-line matching, affecting ``^`` and |
|
||
| | ``$``. |
|
||
+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
| :const:`VERBOSE`, :const:`X` | Enable verbose REs, which can be organized |
|
||
| (for 'extended') | more cleanly and understandably. |
|
||
+---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. data:: I
|
||
IGNORECASE
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
Perform case-insensitive matching; character class and literal strings will
|
||
match letters by ignoring case. For example, ``[A-Z]`` will match lowercase
|
||
letters, too. Full Unicode matching also works unless the :const:`ASCII`
|
||
flag is used to disable non-ASCII matches. When the Unicode patterns
|
||
``[a-z]`` or ``[A-Z]`` are used in combination with the :const:`IGNORECASE`
|
||
flag, they will match the 52 ASCII letters and 4 additional non-ASCII
|
||
letters: 'İ' (U+0130, Latin capital letter I with dot above), 'ı' (U+0131,
|
||
Latin small letter dotless i), 'ſ' (U+017F, Latin small letter long s) and
|
||
'K' (U+212A, Kelvin sign). ``Spam`` will match ``'Spam'``, ``'spam'``,
|
||
``'spAM'``, or ``'ſpam'`` (the latter is matched only in Unicode mode).
|
||
This lowercasing doesn't take the current locale into account;
|
||
it will if you also set the :const:`LOCALE` flag.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. data:: L
|
||
LOCALE
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
Make ``\w``, ``\W``, ``\b``, ``\B`` and case-insensitive matching dependent
|
||
on the current locale instead of the Unicode database.
|
||
|
||
Locales are a feature of the C library intended to help in writing programs
|
||
that take account of language differences. For example, if you're
|
||
processing encoded French text, you'd want to be able to write ``\w+`` to
|
||
match words, but ``\w`` only matches the character class ``[A-Za-z]`` in
|
||
bytes patterns; it won't match bytes corresponding to ``é`` or ``ç``.
|
||
If your system is configured properly and a French locale is selected,
|
||
certain C functions will tell the program that the byte corresponding to
|
||
``é`` should also be considered a letter.
|
||
Setting the :const:`LOCALE` flag when compiling a regular expression will cause
|
||
the resulting compiled object to use these C functions for ``\w``; this is
|
||
slower, but also enables ``\w+`` to match French words as you'd expect.
|
||
The use of this flag is discouraged in Python 3 as the locale mechanism
|
||
is very unreliable, it only handles one "culture" at a time, and it only
|
||
works with 8-bit locales. Unicode matching is already enabled by default
|
||
in Python 3 for Unicode (str) patterns, and it is able to handle different
|
||
locales/languages.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. data:: M
|
||
MULTILINE
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
(``^`` and ``$`` haven't been explained yet; they'll be introduced in section
|
||
:ref:`more-metacharacters`.)
|
||
|
||
Usually ``^`` matches only at the beginning of the string, and ``$`` matches
|
||
only at the end of the string and immediately before the newline (if any) at the
|
||
end of the string. When this flag is specified, ``^`` matches at the beginning
|
||
of the string and at the beginning of each line within the string, immediately
|
||
following each newline. Similarly, the ``$`` metacharacter matches either at
|
||
the end of the string and at the end of each line (immediately preceding each
|
||
newline).
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. data:: S
|
||
DOTALL
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
Makes the ``'.'`` special character match any character at all, including a
|
||
newline; without this flag, ``'.'`` will match anything *except* a newline.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. data:: A
|
||
ASCII
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
Make ``\w``, ``\W``, ``\b``, ``\B``, ``\s`` and ``\S`` perform ASCII-only
|
||
matching instead of full Unicode matching. This is only meaningful for
|
||
Unicode patterns, and is ignored for byte patterns.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. data:: X
|
||
VERBOSE
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
This flag allows you to write regular expressions that are more readable by
|
||
granting you more flexibility in how you can format them. When this flag has
|
||
been specified, whitespace within the RE string is ignored, except when the
|
||
whitespace is in a character class or preceded by an unescaped backslash; this
|
||
lets you organize and indent the RE more clearly. This flag also lets you put
|
||
comments within a RE that will be ignored by the engine; comments are marked by
|
||
a ``'#'`` that's neither in a character class or preceded by an unescaped
|
||
backslash.
|
||
|
||
For example, here's a RE that uses :const:`re.VERBOSE`; see how much easier it
|
||
is to read? ::
|
||
|
||
charref = re.compile(r"""
|
||
&[#] # Start of a numeric entity reference
|
||
(
|
||
0[0-7]+ # Octal form
|
||
| [0-9]+ # Decimal form
|
||
| x[0-9a-fA-F]+ # Hexadecimal form
|
||
)
|
||
; # Trailing semicolon
|
||
""", re.VERBOSE)
|
||
|
||
Without the verbose setting, the RE would look like this::
|
||
|
||
charref = re.compile("&#(0[0-7]+"
|
||
"|[0-9]+"
|
||
"|x[0-9a-fA-F]+);")
|
||
|
||
In the above example, Python's automatic concatenation of string literals has
|
||
been used to break up the RE into smaller pieces, but it's still more difficult
|
||
to understand than the version using :const:`re.VERBOSE`.
|
||
|
||
|
||
More Pattern Power
|
||
==================
|
||
|
||
So far we've only covered a part of the features of regular expressions. In
|
||
this section, we'll cover some new metacharacters, and how to use groups to
|
||
retrieve portions of the text that was matched.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. _more-metacharacters:
|
||
|
||
More Metacharacters
|
||
-------------------
|
||
|
||
There are some metacharacters that we haven't covered yet. Most of them will be
|
||
covered in this section.
|
||
|
||
Some of the remaining metacharacters to be discussed are :dfn:`zero-width
|
||
assertions`. They don't cause the engine to advance through the string;
|
||
instead, they consume no characters at all, and simply succeed or fail. For
|
||
example, ``\b`` is an assertion that the current position is located at a word
|
||
boundary; the position isn't changed by the ``\b`` at all. This means that
|
||
zero-width assertions should never be repeated, because if they match once at a
|
||
given location, they can obviously be matched an infinite number of times.
|
||
|
||
``|``
|
||
Alternation, or the "or" operator. If *A* and *B* are regular expressions,
|
||
``A|B`` will match any string that matches either *A* or *B*. ``|`` has very
|
||
low precedence in order to make it work reasonably when you're alternating
|
||
multi-character strings. ``Crow|Servo`` will match either ``'Crow'`` or ``'Servo'``,
|
||
not ``'Cro'``, a ``'w'`` or an ``'S'``, and ``'ervo'``.
|
||
|
||
To match a literal ``'|'``, use ``\|``, or enclose it inside a character class,
|
||
as in ``[|]``.
|
||
|
||
``^``
|
||
Matches at the beginning of lines. Unless the :const:`MULTILINE` flag has been
|
||
set, this will only match at the beginning of the string. In :const:`MULTILINE`
|
||
mode, this also matches immediately after each newline within the string.
|
||
|
||
For example, if you wish to match the word ``From`` only at the beginning of a
|
||
line, the RE to use is ``^From``. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> print(re.search('^From', 'From Here to Eternity')) #doctest: +ELLIPSIS
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(0, 4), match='From'>
|
||
>>> print(re.search('^From', 'Reciting From Memory'))
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
To match a literal ``'^'``, use ``\^``.
|
||
|
||
``$``
|
||
Matches at the end of a line, which is defined as either the end of the string,
|
||
or any location followed by a newline character. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> print(re.search('}$', '{block}')) #doctest: +ELLIPSIS
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(6, 7), match='}'>
|
||
>>> print(re.search('}$', '{block} '))
|
||
None
|
||
>>> print(re.search('}$', '{block}\n')) #doctest: +ELLIPSIS
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(6, 7), match='}'>
|
||
|
||
To match a literal ``'$'``, use ``\$`` or enclose it inside a character class,
|
||
as in ``[$]``.
|
||
|
||
``\A``
|
||
Matches only at the start of the string. When not in :const:`MULTILINE` mode,
|
||
``\A`` and ``^`` are effectively the same. In :const:`MULTILINE` mode, they're
|
||
different: ``\A`` still matches only at the beginning of the string, but ``^``
|
||
may match at any location inside the string that follows a newline character.
|
||
|
||
``\Z``
|
||
Matches only at the end of the string.
|
||
|
||
``\b``
|
||
Word boundary. This is a zero-width assertion that matches only at the
|
||
beginning or end of a word. A word is defined as a sequence of alphanumeric
|
||
characters, so the end of a word is indicated by whitespace or a
|
||
non-alphanumeric character.
|
||
|
||
The following example matches ``class`` only when it's a complete word; it won't
|
||
match when it's contained inside another word. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'\bclass\b')
|
||
>>> print(p.search('no class at all'))
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(3, 8), match='class'>
|
||
>>> print(p.search('the declassified algorithm'))
|
||
None
|
||
>>> print(p.search('one subclass is'))
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
There are two subtleties you should remember when using this special sequence.
|
||
First, this is the worst collision between Python's string literals and regular
|
||
expression sequences. In Python's string literals, ``\b`` is the backspace
|
||
character, ASCII value 8. If you're not using raw strings, then Python will
|
||
convert the ``\b`` to a backspace, and your RE won't match as you expect it to.
|
||
The following example looks the same as our previous RE, but omits the ``'r'``
|
||
in front of the RE string. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('\bclass\b')
|
||
>>> print(p.search('no class at all'))
|
||
None
|
||
>>> print(p.search('\b' + 'class' + '\b'))
|
||
<re.Match object; span=(0, 7), match='\x08class\x08'>
|
||
|
||
Second, inside a character class, where there's no use for this assertion,
|
||
``\b`` represents the backspace character, for compatibility with Python's
|
||
string literals.
|
||
|
||
``\B``
|
||
Another zero-width assertion, this is the opposite of ``\b``, only matching when
|
||
the current position is not at a word boundary.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Grouping
|
||
--------
|
||
|
||
Frequently you need to obtain more information than just whether the RE matched
|
||
or not. Regular expressions are often used to dissect strings by writing a RE
|
||
divided into several subgroups which match different components of interest.
|
||
For example, an RFC-822 header line is divided into a header name and a value,
|
||
separated by a ``':'``, like this::
|
||
|
||
From: author@example.com
|
||
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061227)
|
||
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
||
To: editor@example.com
|
||
|
||
This can be handled by writing a regular expression which matches an entire
|
||
header line, and has one group which matches the header name, and another group
|
||
which matches the header's value.
|
||
|
||
Groups are marked by the ``'('``, ``')'`` metacharacters. ``'('`` and ``')'``
|
||
have much the same meaning as they do in mathematical expressions; they group
|
||
together the expressions contained inside them, and you can repeat the contents
|
||
of a group with a repeating qualifier, such as ``*``, ``+``, ``?``, or
|
||
``{m,n}``. For example, ``(ab)*`` will match zero or more repetitions of
|
||
``ab``. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('(ab)*')
|
||
>>> print(p.match('ababababab').span())
|
||
(0, 10)
|
||
|
||
Groups indicated with ``'('``, ``')'`` also capture the starting and ending
|
||
index of the text that they match; this can be retrieved by passing an argument
|
||
to :meth:`~re.Match.group`, :meth:`~re.Match.start`, :meth:`~re.Match.end`, and
|
||
:meth:`~re.Match.span`. Groups are
|
||
numbered starting with 0. Group 0 is always present; it's the whole RE, so
|
||
:ref:`match object <match-objects>` methods all have group 0 as their default
|
||
argument. Later we'll see how to express groups that don't capture the span
|
||
of text that they match. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('(a)b')
|
||
>>> m = p.match('ab')
|
||
>>> m.group()
|
||
'ab'
|
||
>>> m.group(0)
|
||
'ab'
|
||
|
||
Subgroups are numbered from left to right, from 1 upward. Groups can be nested;
|
||
to determine the number, just count the opening parenthesis characters, going
|
||
from left to right. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('(a(b)c)d')
|
||
>>> m = p.match('abcd')
|
||
>>> m.group(0)
|
||
'abcd'
|
||
>>> m.group(1)
|
||
'abc'
|
||
>>> m.group(2)
|
||
'b'
|
||
|
||
:meth:`~re.Match.group` can be passed multiple group numbers at a time, in which case it
|
||
will return a tuple containing the corresponding values for those groups. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> m.group(2,1,2)
|
||
('b', 'abc', 'b')
|
||
|
||
The :meth:`~re.Match.groups` method returns a tuple containing the strings for all the
|
||
subgroups, from 1 up to however many there are. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> m.groups()
|
||
('abc', 'b')
|
||
|
||
Backreferences in a pattern allow you to specify that the contents of an earlier
|
||
capturing group must also be found at the current location in the string. For
|
||
example, ``\1`` will succeed if the exact contents of group 1 can be found at
|
||
the current position, and fails otherwise. Remember that Python's string
|
||
literals also use a backslash followed by numbers to allow including arbitrary
|
||
characters in a string, so be sure to use a raw string when incorporating
|
||
backreferences in a RE.
|
||
|
||
For example, the following RE detects doubled words in a string. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'\b(\w+)\s+\1\b')
|
||
>>> p.search('Paris in the the spring').group()
|
||
'the the'
|
||
|
||
Backreferences like this aren't often useful for just searching through a string
|
||
--- there are few text formats which repeat data in this way --- but you'll soon
|
||
find out that they're *very* useful when performing string substitutions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Non-capturing and Named Groups
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Elaborate REs may use many groups, both to capture substrings of interest, and
|
||
to group and structure the RE itself. In complex REs, it becomes difficult to
|
||
keep track of the group numbers. There are two features which help with this
|
||
problem. Both of them use a common syntax for regular expression extensions, so
|
||
we'll look at that first.
|
||
|
||
Perl 5 is well known for its powerful additions to standard regular expressions.
|
||
For these new features the Perl developers couldn't choose new single-keystroke metacharacters
|
||
or new special sequences beginning with ``\`` without making Perl's regular
|
||
expressions confusingly different from standard REs. If they chose ``&`` as a
|
||
new metacharacter, for example, old expressions would be assuming that ``&`` was
|
||
a regular character and wouldn't have escaped it by writing ``\&`` or ``[&]``.
|
||
|
||
The solution chosen by the Perl developers was to use ``(?...)`` as the
|
||
extension syntax. ``?`` immediately after a parenthesis was a syntax error
|
||
because the ``?`` would have nothing to repeat, so this didn't introduce any
|
||
compatibility problems. The characters immediately after the ``?`` indicate
|
||
what extension is being used, so ``(?=foo)`` is one thing (a positive lookahead
|
||
assertion) and ``(?:foo)`` is something else (a non-capturing group containing
|
||
the subexpression ``foo``).
|
||
|
||
Python supports several of Perl's extensions and adds an extension
|
||
syntax to Perl's extension syntax. If the first character after the
|
||
question mark is a ``P``, you know that it's an extension that's
|
||
specific to Python.
|
||
|
||
Now that we've looked at the general extension syntax, we can return
|
||
to the features that simplify working with groups in complex REs.
|
||
|
||
Sometimes you'll want to use a group to denote a part of a regular expression,
|
||
but aren't interested in retrieving the group's contents. You can make this fact
|
||
explicit by using a non-capturing group: ``(?:...)``, where you can replace the
|
||
``...`` with any other regular expression. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> m = re.match("([abc])+", "abc")
|
||
>>> m.groups()
|
||
('c',)
|
||
>>> m = re.match("(?:[abc])+", "abc")
|
||
>>> m.groups()
|
||
()
|
||
|
||
Except for the fact that you can't retrieve the contents of what the group
|
||
matched, a non-capturing group behaves exactly the same as a capturing group;
|
||
you can put anything inside it, repeat it with a repetition metacharacter such
|
||
as ``*``, and nest it within other groups (capturing or non-capturing).
|
||
``(?:...)`` is particularly useful when modifying an existing pattern, since you
|
||
can add new groups without changing how all the other groups are numbered. It
|
||
should be mentioned that there's no performance difference in searching between
|
||
capturing and non-capturing groups; neither form is any faster than the other.
|
||
|
||
A more significant feature is named groups: instead of referring to them by
|
||
numbers, groups can be referenced by a name.
|
||
|
||
The syntax for a named group is one of the Python-specific extensions:
|
||
``(?P<name>...)``. *name* is, obviously, the name of the group. Named groups
|
||
behave exactly like capturing groups, and additionally associate a name
|
||
with a group. The :ref:`match object <match-objects>` methods that deal with
|
||
capturing groups all accept either integers that refer to the group by number
|
||
or strings that contain the desired group's name. Named groups are still
|
||
given numbers, so you can retrieve information about a group in two ways::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'(?P<word>\b\w+\b)')
|
||
>>> m = p.search( '(((( Lots of punctuation )))' )
|
||
>>> m.group('word')
|
||
'Lots'
|
||
>>> m.group(1)
|
||
'Lots'
|
||
|
||
Named groups are handy because they let you use easily-remembered names, instead
|
||
of having to remember numbers. Here's an example RE from the :mod:`imaplib`
|
||
module::
|
||
|
||
InternalDate = re.compile(r'INTERNALDATE "'
|
||
r'(?P<day>[ 123][0-9])-(?P<mon>[A-Z][a-z][a-z])-'
|
||
r'(?P<year>[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])'
|
||
r' (?P<hour>[0-9][0-9]):(?P<min>[0-9][0-9]):(?P<sec>[0-9][0-9])'
|
||
r' (?P<zonen>[-+])(?P<zoneh>[0-9][0-9])(?P<zonem>[0-9][0-9])'
|
||
r'"')
|
||
|
||
It's obviously much easier to retrieve ``m.group('zonem')``, instead of having
|
||
to remember to retrieve group 9.
|
||
|
||
The syntax for backreferences in an expression such as ``(...)\1`` refers to the
|
||
number of the group. There's naturally a variant that uses the group name
|
||
instead of the number. This is another Python extension: ``(?P=name)`` indicates
|
||
that the contents of the group called *name* should again be matched at the
|
||
current point. The regular expression for finding doubled words,
|
||
``\b(\w+)\s+\1\b`` can also be written as ``\b(?P<word>\w+)\s+(?P=word)\b``::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'\b(?P<word>\w+)\s+(?P=word)\b')
|
||
>>> p.search('Paris in the the spring').group()
|
||
'the the'
|
||
|
||
|
||
Lookahead Assertions
|
||
--------------------
|
||
|
||
Another zero-width assertion is the lookahead assertion. Lookahead assertions
|
||
are available in both positive and negative form, and look like this:
|
||
|
||
``(?=...)``
|
||
Positive lookahead assertion. This succeeds if the contained regular
|
||
expression, represented here by ``...``, successfully matches at the current
|
||
location, and fails otherwise. But, once the contained expression has been
|
||
tried, the matching engine doesn't advance at all; the rest of the pattern is
|
||
tried right where the assertion started.
|
||
|
||
``(?!...)``
|
||
Negative lookahead assertion. This is the opposite of the positive assertion;
|
||
it succeeds if the contained expression *doesn't* match at the current position
|
||
in the string.
|
||
|
||
To make this concrete, let's look at a case where a lookahead is useful.
|
||
Consider a simple pattern to match a filename and split it apart into a base
|
||
name and an extension, separated by a ``.``. For example, in ``news.rc``,
|
||
``news`` is the base name, and ``rc`` is the filename's extension.
|
||
|
||
The pattern to match this is quite simple:
|
||
|
||
``.*[.].*$``
|
||
|
||
Notice that the ``.`` needs to be treated specially because it's a
|
||
metacharacter, so it's inside a character class to only match that
|
||
specific character. Also notice the trailing ``$``; this is added to
|
||
ensure that all the rest of the string must be included in the
|
||
extension. This regular expression matches ``foo.bar`` and
|
||
``autoexec.bat`` and ``sendmail.cf`` and ``printers.conf``.
|
||
|
||
Now, consider complicating the problem a bit; what if you want to match
|
||
filenames where the extension is not ``bat``? Some incorrect attempts:
|
||
|
||
``.*[.][^b].*$`` The first attempt above tries to exclude ``bat`` by requiring
|
||
that the first character of the extension is not a ``b``. This is wrong,
|
||
because the pattern also doesn't match ``foo.bar``.
|
||
|
||
``.*[.]([^b]..|.[^a].|..[^t])$``
|
||
|
||
The expression gets messier when you try to patch up the first solution by
|
||
requiring one of the following cases to match: the first character of the
|
||
extension isn't ``b``; the second character isn't ``a``; or the third character
|
||
isn't ``t``. This accepts ``foo.bar`` and rejects ``autoexec.bat``, but it
|
||
requires a three-letter extension and won't accept a filename with a two-letter
|
||
extension such as ``sendmail.cf``. We'll complicate the pattern again in an
|
||
effort to fix it.
|
||
|
||
``.*[.]([^b].?.?|.[^a]?.?|..?[^t]?)$``
|
||
|
||
In the third attempt, the second and third letters are all made optional in
|
||
order to allow matching extensions shorter than three characters, such as
|
||
``sendmail.cf``.
|
||
|
||
The pattern's getting really complicated now, which makes it hard to read and
|
||
understand. Worse, if the problem changes and you want to exclude both ``bat``
|
||
and ``exe`` as extensions, the pattern would get even more complicated and
|
||
confusing.
|
||
|
||
A negative lookahead cuts through all this confusion:
|
||
|
||
``.*[.](?!bat$)[^.]*$`` The negative lookahead means: if the expression ``bat``
|
||
doesn't match at this point, try the rest of the pattern; if ``bat$`` does
|
||
match, the whole pattern will fail. The trailing ``$`` is required to ensure
|
||
that something like ``sample.batch``, where the extension only starts with
|
||
``bat``, will be allowed. The ``[^.]*`` makes sure that the pattern works
|
||
when there are multiple dots in the filename.
|
||
|
||
Excluding another filename extension is now easy; simply add it as an
|
||
alternative inside the assertion. The following pattern excludes filenames that
|
||
end in either ``bat`` or ``exe``:
|
||
|
||
``.*[.](?!bat$|exe$)[^.]*$``
|
||
|
||
|
||
Modifying Strings
|
||
=================
|
||
|
||
Up to this point, we've simply performed searches against a static string.
|
||
Regular expressions are also commonly used to modify strings in various ways,
|
||
using the following pattern methods:
|
||
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
| Method/Attribute | Purpose |
|
||
+==================+===============================================+
|
||
| ``split()`` | Split the string into a list, splitting it |
|
||
| | wherever the RE matches |
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``sub()`` | Find all substrings where the RE matches, and |
|
||
| | replace them with a different string |
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
| ``subn()`` | Does the same thing as :meth:`!sub`, but |
|
||
| | returns the new string and the number of |
|
||
| | replacements |
|
||
+------------------+-----------------------------------------------+
|
||
|
||
|
||
Splitting Strings
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
The :meth:`~re.Pattern.split` method of a pattern splits a string apart
|
||
wherever the RE matches, returning a list of the pieces. It's similar to the
|
||
:meth:`~str.split` method of strings but provides much more generality in the
|
||
delimiters that you can split by; string :meth:`!split` only supports splitting by
|
||
whitespace or by a fixed string. As you'd expect, there's a module-level
|
||
:func:`re.split` function, too.
|
||
|
||
|
||
.. method:: .split(string [, maxsplit=0])
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
Split *string* by the matches of the regular expression. If capturing
|
||
parentheses are used in the RE, then their contents will also be returned as
|
||
part of the resulting list. If *maxsplit* is nonzero, at most *maxsplit* splits
|
||
are performed.
|
||
|
||
You can limit the number of splits made, by passing a value for *maxsplit*.
|
||
When *maxsplit* is nonzero, at most *maxsplit* splits will be made, and the
|
||
remainder of the string is returned as the final element of the list. In the
|
||
following example, the delimiter is any sequence of non-alphanumeric characters.
|
||
::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'\W+')
|
||
>>> p.split('This is a test, short and sweet, of split().')
|
||
['This', 'is', 'a', 'test', 'short', 'and', 'sweet', 'of', 'split', '']
|
||
>>> p.split('This is a test, short and sweet, of split().', 3)
|
||
['This', 'is', 'a', 'test, short and sweet, of split().']
|
||
|
||
Sometimes you're not only interested in what the text between delimiters is, but
|
||
also need to know what the delimiter was. If capturing parentheses are used in
|
||
the RE, then their values are also returned as part of the list. Compare the
|
||
following calls::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'\W+')
|
||
>>> p2 = re.compile(r'(\W+)')
|
||
>>> p.split('This... is a test.')
|
||
['This', 'is', 'a', 'test', '']
|
||
>>> p2.split('This... is a test.')
|
||
['This', '... ', 'is', ' ', 'a', ' ', 'test', '.', '']
|
||
|
||
The module-level function :func:`re.split` adds the RE to be used as the first
|
||
argument, but is otherwise the same. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> re.split(r'[\W]+', 'Words, words, words.')
|
||
['Words', 'words', 'words', '']
|
||
>>> re.split(r'([\W]+)', 'Words, words, words.')
|
||
['Words', ', ', 'words', ', ', 'words', '.', '']
|
||
>>> re.split(r'[\W]+', 'Words, words, words.', 1)
|
||
['Words', 'words, words.']
|
||
|
||
|
||
Search and Replace
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
Another common task is to find all the matches for a pattern, and replace them
|
||
with a different string. The :meth:`~re.Pattern.sub` method takes a replacement value,
|
||
which can be either a string or a function, and the string to be processed.
|
||
|
||
.. method:: .sub(replacement, string[, count=0])
|
||
:noindex:
|
||
|
||
Returns the string obtained by replacing the leftmost non-overlapping
|
||
occurrences of the RE in *string* by the replacement *replacement*. If the
|
||
pattern isn't found, *string* is returned unchanged.
|
||
|
||
The optional argument *count* is the maximum number of pattern occurrences to be
|
||
replaced; *count* must be a non-negative integer. The default value of 0 means
|
||
to replace all occurrences.
|
||
|
||
Here's a simple example of using the :meth:`~re.Pattern.sub` method. It replaces colour
|
||
names with the word ``colour``::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('(blue|white|red)')
|
||
>>> p.sub('colour', 'blue socks and red shoes')
|
||
'colour socks and colour shoes'
|
||
>>> p.sub('colour', 'blue socks and red shoes', count=1)
|
||
'colour socks and red shoes'
|
||
|
||
The :meth:`~re.Pattern.subn` method does the same work, but returns a 2-tuple containing the
|
||
new string value and the number of replacements that were performed::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('(blue|white|red)')
|
||
>>> p.subn('colour', 'blue socks and red shoes')
|
||
('colour socks and colour shoes', 2)
|
||
>>> p.subn('colour', 'no colours at all')
|
||
('no colours at all', 0)
|
||
|
||
Empty matches are replaced only when they're not adjacent to a previous empty match.
|
||
::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('x*')
|
||
>>> p.sub('-', 'abxd')
|
||
'-a-b--d-'
|
||
|
||
If *replacement* is a string, any backslash escapes in it are processed. That
|
||
is, ``\n`` is converted to a single newline character, ``\r`` is converted to a
|
||
carriage return, and so forth. Unknown escapes such as ``\&`` are left alone.
|
||
Backreferences, such as ``\6``, are replaced with the substring matched by the
|
||
corresponding group in the RE. This lets you incorporate portions of the
|
||
original text in the resulting replacement string.
|
||
|
||
This example matches the word ``section`` followed by a string enclosed in
|
||
``{``, ``}``, and changes ``section`` to ``subsection``::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('section{ ( [^}]* ) }', re.VERBOSE)
|
||
>>> p.sub(r'subsection{\1}','section{First} section{second}')
|
||
'subsection{First} subsection{second}'
|
||
|
||
There's also a syntax for referring to named groups as defined by the
|
||
``(?P<name>...)`` syntax. ``\g<name>`` will use the substring matched by the
|
||
group named ``name``, and ``\g<number>`` uses the corresponding group number.
|
||
``\g<2>`` is therefore equivalent to ``\2``, but isn't ambiguous in a
|
||
replacement string such as ``\g<2>0``. (``\20`` would be interpreted as a
|
||
reference to group 20, not a reference to group 2 followed by the literal
|
||
character ``'0'``.) The following substitutions are all equivalent, but use all
|
||
three variations of the replacement string. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> p = re.compile('section{ (?P<name> [^}]* ) }', re.VERBOSE)
|
||
>>> p.sub(r'subsection{\1}','section{First}')
|
||
'subsection{First}'
|
||
>>> p.sub(r'subsection{\g<1>}','section{First}')
|
||
'subsection{First}'
|
||
>>> p.sub(r'subsection{\g<name>}','section{First}')
|
||
'subsection{First}'
|
||
|
||
*replacement* can also be a function, which gives you even more control. If
|
||
*replacement* is a function, the function is called for every non-overlapping
|
||
occurrence of *pattern*. On each call, the function is passed a
|
||
:ref:`match object <match-objects>` argument for the match and can use this
|
||
information to compute the desired replacement string and return it.
|
||
|
||
In the following example, the replacement function translates decimals into
|
||
hexadecimal::
|
||
|
||
>>> def hexrepl(match):
|
||
... "Return the hex string for a decimal number"
|
||
... value = int(match.group())
|
||
... return hex(value)
|
||
...
|
||
>>> p = re.compile(r'\d+')
|
||
>>> p.sub(hexrepl, 'Call 65490 for printing, 49152 for user code.')
|
||
'Call 0xffd2 for printing, 0xc000 for user code.'
|
||
|
||
When using the module-level :func:`re.sub` function, the pattern is passed as
|
||
the first argument. The pattern may be provided as an object or as a string; if
|
||
you need to specify regular expression flags, you must either use a
|
||
pattern object as the first parameter, or use embedded modifiers in the
|
||
pattern string, e.g. ``sub("(?i)b+", "x", "bbbb BBBB")`` returns ``'x x'``.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Common Problems
|
||
===============
|
||
|
||
Regular expressions are a powerful tool for some applications, but in some ways
|
||
their behaviour isn't intuitive and at times they don't behave the way you may
|
||
expect them to. This section will point out some of the most common pitfalls.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Use String Methods
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
Sometimes using the :mod:`re` module is a mistake. If you're matching a fixed
|
||
string, or a single character class, and you're not using any :mod:`re` features
|
||
such as the :const:`~re.IGNORECASE` flag, then the full power of regular expressions
|
||
may not be required. Strings have several methods for performing operations with
|
||
fixed strings and they're usually much faster, because the implementation is a
|
||
single small C loop that's been optimized for the purpose, instead of the large,
|
||
more generalized regular expression engine.
|
||
|
||
One example might be replacing a single fixed string with another one; for
|
||
example, you might replace ``word`` with ``deed``. :func:`re.sub` seems like the
|
||
function to use for this, but consider the :meth:`~str.replace` method. Note that
|
||
:meth:`!replace` will also replace ``word`` inside words, turning ``swordfish``
|
||
into ``sdeedfish``, but the naive RE ``word`` would have done that, too. (To
|
||
avoid performing the substitution on parts of words, the pattern would have to
|
||
be ``\bword\b``, in order to require that ``word`` have a word boundary on
|
||
either side. This takes the job beyond :meth:`!replace`'s abilities.)
|
||
|
||
Another common task is deleting every occurrence of a single character from a
|
||
string or replacing it with another single character. You might do this with
|
||
something like ``re.sub('\n', ' ', S)``, but :meth:`~str.translate` is capable of
|
||
doing both tasks and will be faster than any regular expression operation can
|
||
be.
|
||
|
||
In short, before turning to the :mod:`re` module, consider whether your problem
|
||
can be solved with a faster and simpler string method.
|
||
|
||
|
||
match() versus search()
|
||
-----------------------
|
||
|
||
The :func:`~re.match` function only checks if the RE matches at the beginning of the
|
||
string while :func:`~re.search` will scan forward through the string for a match.
|
||
It's important to keep this distinction in mind. Remember, :func:`!match` will
|
||
only report a successful match which will start at 0; if the match wouldn't
|
||
start at zero, :func:`!match` will *not* report it. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> print(re.match('super', 'superstition').span())
|
||
(0, 5)
|
||
>>> print(re.match('super', 'insuperable'))
|
||
None
|
||
|
||
On the other hand, :func:`~re.search` will scan forward through the string,
|
||
reporting the first match it finds. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> print(re.search('super', 'superstition').span())
|
||
(0, 5)
|
||
>>> print(re.search('super', 'insuperable').span())
|
||
(2, 7)
|
||
|
||
Sometimes you'll be tempted to keep using :func:`re.match`, and just add ``.*``
|
||
to the front of your RE. Resist this temptation and use :func:`re.search`
|
||
instead. The regular expression compiler does some analysis of REs in order to
|
||
speed up the process of looking for a match. One such analysis figures out what
|
||
the first character of a match must be; for example, a pattern starting with
|
||
``Crow`` must match starting with a ``'C'``. The analysis lets the engine
|
||
quickly scan through the string looking for the starting character, only trying
|
||
the full match if a ``'C'`` is found.
|
||
|
||
Adding ``.*`` defeats this optimization, requiring scanning to the end of the
|
||
string and then backtracking to find a match for the rest of the RE. Use
|
||
:func:`re.search` instead.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Greedy versus Non-Greedy
|
||
------------------------
|
||
|
||
When repeating a regular expression, as in ``a*``, the resulting action is to
|
||
consume as much of the pattern as possible. This fact often bites you when
|
||
you're trying to match a pair of balanced delimiters, such as the angle brackets
|
||
surrounding an HTML tag. The naive pattern for matching a single HTML tag
|
||
doesn't work because of the greedy nature of ``.*``. ::
|
||
|
||
>>> s = '<html><head><title>Title</title>'
|
||
>>> len(s)
|
||
32
|
||
>>> print(re.match('<.*>', s).span())
|
||
(0, 32)
|
||
>>> print(re.match('<.*>', s).group())
|
||
<html><head><title>Title</title>
|
||
|
||
The RE matches the ``'<'`` in ``'<html>'``, and the ``.*`` consumes the rest of
|
||
the string. There's still more left in the RE, though, and the ``>`` can't
|
||
match at the end of the string, so the regular expression engine has to
|
||
backtrack character by character until it finds a match for the ``>``. The
|
||
final match extends from the ``'<'`` in ``'<html>'`` to the ``'>'`` in
|
||
``'</title>'``, which isn't what you want.
|
||
|
||
In this case, the solution is to use the non-greedy qualifiers ``*?``, ``+?``,
|
||
``??``, or ``{m,n}?``, which match as *little* text as possible. In the above
|
||
example, the ``'>'`` is tried immediately after the first ``'<'`` matches, and
|
||
when it fails, the engine advances a character at a time, retrying the ``'>'``
|
||
at every step. This produces just the right result::
|
||
|
||
>>> print(re.match('<.*?>', s).group())
|
||
<html>
|
||
|
||
(Note that parsing HTML or XML with regular expressions is painful.
|
||
Quick-and-dirty patterns will handle common cases, but HTML and XML have special
|
||
cases that will break the obvious regular expression; by the time you've written
|
||
a regular expression that handles all of the possible cases, the patterns will
|
||
be *very* complicated. Use an HTML or XML parser module for such tasks.)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Using re.VERBOSE
|
||
----------------
|
||
|
||
By now you've probably noticed that regular expressions are a very compact
|
||
notation, but they're not terribly readable. REs of moderate complexity can
|
||
become lengthy collections of backslashes, parentheses, and metacharacters,
|
||
making them difficult to read and understand.
|
||
|
||
For such REs, specifying the :const:`re.VERBOSE` flag when compiling the regular
|
||
expression can be helpful, because it allows you to format the regular
|
||
expression more clearly.
|
||
|
||
The ``re.VERBOSE`` flag has several effects. Whitespace in the regular
|
||
expression that *isn't* inside a character class is ignored. This means that an
|
||
expression such as ``dog | cat`` is equivalent to the less readable ``dog|cat``,
|
||
but ``[a b]`` will still match the characters ``'a'``, ``'b'``, or a space. In
|
||
addition, you can also put comments inside a RE; comments extend from a ``#``
|
||
character to the next newline. When used with triple-quoted strings, this
|
||
enables REs to be formatted more neatly::
|
||
|
||
pat = re.compile(r"""
|
||
\s* # Skip leading whitespace
|
||
(?P<header>[^:]+) # Header name
|
||
\s* : # Whitespace, and a colon
|
||
(?P<value>.*?) # The header's value -- *? used to
|
||
# lose the following trailing whitespace
|
||
\s*$ # Trailing whitespace to end-of-line
|
||
""", re.VERBOSE)
|
||
|
||
This is far more readable than::
|
||
|
||
pat = re.compile(r"\s*(?P<header>[^:]+)\s*:(?P<value>.*?)\s*$")
|
||
|
||
|
||
Feedback
|
||
========
|
||
|
||
Regular expressions are a complicated topic. Did this document help you
|
||
understand them? Were there parts that were unclear, or Problems you
|
||
encountered that weren't covered here? If so, please send suggestions for
|
||
improvements to the author.
|
||
|
||
The most complete book on regular expressions is almost certainly Jeffrey
|
||
Friedl's Mastering Regular Expressions, published by O'Reilly. Unfortunately,
|
||
it exclusively concentrates on Perl and Java's flavours of regular expressions,
|
||
and doesn't contain any Python material at all, so it won't be useful as a
|
||
reference for programming in Python. (The first edition covered Python's
|
||
now-removed :mod:`!regex` module, which won't help you much.) Consider checking
|
||
it out from your library.
|