If anyone wants to clean up the documentation, feel free. It's my first documentation foray, and it's not that great.
Will port to py3k with a different strategy.
renamed Include/bytesobject.h to Include/bytearrayobject.h
renamed Include/stringobject.h to Include/bytesobject.h
added Include/stringobject.h with aliases
Adds 'n' as a format specifier for integers, to mirror the same
specifier which is already available for floats. 'n' is the same as
'd', but inserts the current locale-specific thousands grouping.
I added this as a stringlib function, but it's only used by str type,
not unicode. This is because of an implementation detail in
unicode.format(), which does its own str->unicode conversion. But the
unicode version will be needed in 3.0, and it may be needed by other
code eventually in 2.6 (maybe decimal?), so I left it as a stringlib
implementation. As long as the unicode version isn't instantiated,
there's no overhead for this.
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/branches/trunk-bytearray
........
r61750 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 20:47:44 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Copied files from py3k w/o modifications
........
r61752 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 20:53:20 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 7 lines
Take One
* Added initialization code, warnings, flags etc. to the appropriate places
* Added new buffer interface to string type
* Modified tests
* Modified Makefile.pre.in to compile the new files
* Added bytesobject.c to Python.h
........
r61754 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 21:22:19 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 2 lines
Disabled bytearray.extend for now since it causes an infinite recursion
Fixed serveral unit tests
........
r61756 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 21:43:38 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 5 lines
Added PyBytes support to several places:
str + bytearray
ord(bytearray)
bytearray(str, encoding)
........
r61760 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 21:56:32 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Fixed more unit tests related to type('') is not unicode
........
r61763 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 22:20:28 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 2 lines
Fixed more unit tests
Fixed bytearray.extend
........
r61768 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 22:40:50 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Implemented old buffer interface for bytearray
........
r61772 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-22 23:24:52 +0100 (Sat, 22 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Added backport of the io module
........
r61775 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-23 03:50:49 +0100 (Sun, 23 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Fix str assignement to bytearray. Assignment of a str of size 1 is interpreted as a single byte
........
r61805 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-23 19:33:48 +0100 (Sun, 23 Mar 2008) | 3 lines
Fixed more tests
Fixed bytearray() comparsion with unicode()
Fixed iterator assignment of bytearray
........
r61809 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-23 21:02:21 +0100 (Sun, 23 Mar 2008) | 2 lines
str(bytesarray()) now returns the bytes and not the representation of the bytearray object
Enabled and fixed more unit tests
........
r61812 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-23 21:53:08 +0100 (Sun, 23 Mar 2008) | 3 lines
Clear error PyNumber_AsSsize_t() fails
Use CHARMASK for ob_svall access
disabled a test with memoryview again
........
r61819 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-23 23:05:57 +0100 (Sun, 23 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Untested updates to the PCBuild directory
........
r61917 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-26 00:57:06 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 1 line
The type system of Python 2.6 has subtle differences to 3.0's. I've removed the Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE flags from bytearray for now. bytearray can't be subclasses until the issues with bytearray subclasses are fixed.
........
r61920 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-26 01:44:08 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 2 lines
Disabled last failing test
I don't understand what the test is testing and how it suppose to work. Ka-Ping, please check it out.
........
r61930 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-26 12:46:18 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Re-enabled bytes warning code
........
r61933 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-26 13:20:46 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Fixed a bug in the new buffer protocol. The buffer slots weren't copied into a subclass.
........
r61934 | christian.heimes | 2008-03-26 13:25:09 +0100 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008) | 1 line
Re-enabled bytearray subclassing - all tests are passing.
........
Highlights:
- Adding PyObject_Format.
- Adding string.Format class.
- Adding __format__ for str, unicode, int, long, float, datetime.
- Adding builtin format.
- Adding ''.format and u''.format.
- str/unicode fixups for formatters.
The files in Objects/stringlib that implement PEP 3101 (stringdefs.h,
unicodedefs.h, formatter.h, string_format.h) are identical in trunk
and py3k. Any changes from here on should be made to trunk, and
changes will propogate to py3k).
as usual with slicing (both with str and unicode strings). This
fixes issue 1259.
For str only the stringobject.c file was modified. But for unicode,
I needed to repeat in the four functions a lot of code, so created
a new function that does part of the job for them (and placed it in
find.h, following a suggestion of Barry).
Also added tests for this behaviour.
also hex escapes) -- this was reaching beyond the end of the input string
buffer, even though it is not supposed to be \0-terminated.
This has no visible effect but is clearly the correct thing to do.
(In 3.0 it had a visible effect after removing ob_sstate from PyString.)
- Specialcase extended slices that amount to a shallow copy the same way as
is done for simple slices, in the tuple, string and unicode case.
- Specialcase step-1 extended slices to optimize the common case for all
involved types.
- For lists, allow extended slice assignment of differing lengths as long
as the step is 1. (Previously, 'l[:2:1] = []' failed even though
'l[:2] = []' and 'l[:2:None] = []' do not.)
- Implement extended slicing for buffer, array, structseq, mmap and
UserString.UserString.
- Implement slice-object support (but not non-step-1 slice assignment) for
UserString.MutableString.
- Add tests for all new functionality.
a large width is passed on 32-bit platforms. Found by Google.
It would be good for people to review this especially carefully and verify
I don't have an off by one error and there is no other way to cause overflow.