* Initialize _PyPreConfig.dev_mode to -1.
* _PyPreConfig_Read(): coreconfig has the priority over preconfig.
* _PyCoreConfig_Read() now calls _PyPreCmdline_Read() internally.
* config_from_cmdline() now pass _PyPreCmdline to config_read().
* Add _PyPreCmdline_Copy().
Prepare code to move some _PyPreConfig parameters into _PyPreCmdline.
Changes:
* _PyCoreConfig_ReadFromArgv(): remove preconfig parameter,
use _PyRuntime.preconfig.
* Add _PyPreCmdline_GetPreConfig() (called by _PyPreConfig_Read()).
* Rename _PyPreCmdline_Init() to _PyPreCmdline_SetArgv()
* Factorize _Py_PreInitializeFromPreConfig() code: add
pyinit_preinit().
* _PyPreConfig_Read() now sets coerce_c_locale to 2 if it must be
coerced.
* Remove _PyCoreConfig_ReadPreConfig().
* _PyCoreConfig_Write() now copies updated preconfig into _PyRuntime.
Set type_attr to NULL after the assignment to stgdict->proto (like
what is done with stgdict after the Py_SETREF() call) so that it is
not decrefed twice on error.
Clarify capturing or suppressing stdout and stderr on the old call APIs.
Do not state that they are equivalent to run() calls when they are not implemented using run as that was misleading. Unlike run they cannot handle stdout or stderr being set to PIPE without a risk of deadlock.
Before, an `AttributeError` was raised due to trying to access an attribute that exists on specs but having received `None` instead for a non-existent module.
https://bugs.python.org/issue36298
Clarify that the naming of protocol handler methods shouldn't be literally called "protocol" but should be named after the actual protocol.
https://bugs.python.org/issue35155
bpo-36256: Fix bug in parsermodule when parsing if statements
In the parser module, when validating nodes before starting the parsing with to create a ST in "parser_newstobject" there is a problem that appears when two arcs in the same DFA state has transitions with labels with the same type. For example, the DFA for if_stmt has a state with
two labels with the same type: "elif" and "else" (type NAME). The algorithm tries one by one the arcs until the label that starts the arc transition has a label with the same type of the current child label we are trying to accept. In this case, the arc for "elif" comes before the arc for "else"and passes this test (because the current child label is "else" and has the same type as "elif"). This lead to expecting a namedexpr_test (305) instead of a colon (11). The solution is to compare also the string representation (in case there is one) of the labels to see if the transition that we have is the correct one.
Currently, when arguments on Parser/asdl_c.py are parsed
``ìf`` sentence is used. This PR Propose to use ``elif``
to avoid multiple evaluting of the ifs.
https://bugs.python.org/issue36385
* Add _PyRuntime.pre_initialized: set to 1 when Python
is pre-initialized
* Add _Py_PreInitialize() and _Py_PreInitializeFromPreConfig().
* _PyCoreConfig_Read() now calls _Py_PreInitialize().
* Move _PyPreConfig_GetGlobalConfig() and
_PyCoreConfig_GetGlobalConfig() calls from main.c to preconfig.c
and coreconfig.c.
Raymond Hettinger
Stephen Rosen
Victor Stinner
Stefan Behnel
Zackery Spytz
Rémi Lapeyre
Louie Lu
Lisa Roach
Terry Jan Reedy
Ned Deily
AraHaan
Inada Naoki
Cheryl Sabella
Gregory P. Smith
Xavier GUIHOT
Brett Cannon
Denton Liu
Kumar Akshay
Pablo Galindo
Isuru Fernando
Steve Dower
Jess
Benedikt Werner
CAM Gerlach
Emmanuel Arias
sth
Serhiy Storchaka
Shubham Aggarwal
Stéphane Wirtel