This is my first issue!
So, if there's anything wrong, please tell me!
Also, thank you always for all the contributors!
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:asvetlov
* Update code after merge review from 1st1
* Use a sentinel approach for loop parameter
Remove unnecessary _get_running_loop patching
* Use more clear function name (_verify_parameter_is_marker -> _verify_no_loop)
* Add init method to _LoopBoundMixin to check that loop param wasn't used
# Improve asyncio.wait function
The original code creates the futures set two times.
We can create this set before, avoiding the second creation.
This new behaviour [breaks the aiokafka library](https://github.com/aio-libs/aiokafka/pull/672), because it gives an iterator to that function, so the second iteration become empty.
Automerge-Triggered-By: GH:1st1
* bpo-41696: Fix handling of debug mode in asyncio.run
This allows PYTHONASYNCIODEBUG or -X dev to enable asyncio debug mode
when using asyncio.run
* 📜🤖 Added by blurb_it.
Co-authored-by: hauntsaninja <>
Co-authored-by: blurb-it[bot] <43283697+blurb-it[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Stopping and restarting a proactor event loop on windows can lead to
spurious errors logged (ConnectionResetError while reading from the
self pipe). This fixes the issue by ensuring that we don't attempt
to start multiple copies of the self-pipe reading loop.
Currently, if `asyncio.wait_for()` itself is cancelled it will always
raise `CancelledError` regardless if the underlying task is still
running. This is similar to a race with the timeout, which is handled
already.
When I was fixing bpo-32751 back in GH-7216 I missed the case when
*timeout* is zero or negative. This takes care of that.
Props to @aaliddell for noticing the inconsistency.
asyncio.AbstractEventLoop.run_in_executor should be a method that returns an asyncio Future, not an async method.
This matches the concrete implementations, and the documentation better.
* bpo-41273: Proactor transport read loop to use recv_into
By using recv_into instead of recv we do not allocate a new buffer each
time _loop_reading calls recv.
This betters performance for any stream using proactor (basically any
asyncio stream on windows).
* bpo-41273: Double proactor read transport buffer size
By doubling the read buffer size we get better performance.
When I wrote the documentation for `asyncio.to_thread()`, I mistakenly assumed that `return await loop.run_in_executor(...)` within an async def function would return a Future. In reality, it returns a coroutine.
This likely won't affect typical usage of `asyncio.to_thread()`, but it's important for the documentation to be correct here. In general, we also tend to avoid returning futures from high-level APIs in asyncio.
Implements `asyncio.to_thread`, a coroutine for asynchronously running IO-bound functions in a separate thread without blocking the event loop. See the discussion starting from [here](https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/18410#issuecomment-628930973) in GH-18410 for context.
Automerge-Triggered-By: @aeros
When an asyncio.Task is cancelled, the exception traceback now
starts with where the task was first interrupted. Previously,
the traceback only had "depth one."
Currently, if asyncio.wait_for() timeout expires, it cancels
inner future and then always raises TimeoutError. In case
those future is task, it can handle cancelation mannually,
and those process can lead to some other exception. Current
implementation silently loses thoses exception.
To resolve this, wait_for will check was the cancelation
successfull or not. In case there was exception, wait_for
will reraise it.
Co-authored-by: Roman Skurikhin <roman.skurikhin@cruxlab.com>
Motivation for this PR (comment from @vstinner in bpo issue):
```
Warning seen o AMD64 Ubuntu Shared 3.x buildbot:
https://buildbot.python.org/all/#/builders/141/builds/2593
test_devnull_output (test.test_a=syncio.test_subprocess.SubprocessThreadedWatcherTests) ...
Warning -- threading_cleanup() failed to cleanup 1 threads (count: 1, dangling: 2)
```
The following implementation details for the new method are TBD:
1) Public vs private
2) Inclusion in `close()`
3) Name
4) Coroutine vs subroutine method
5) *timeout* parameter
If it's a private method, 3, 4, and 5 are significantly less important.
I started with the most minimal implementation that fixes the dangling threads without modifying the regression tests, which I think is particularly important. I typically try to avoid directly modifying existing tests as much as possible unless it's necessary to do so. However, I am open to changing any part of this.
https://bugs.python.org/issue38356
If waitpid() is called elsewhere, waitpid() call fails with
ChildProcessError: use return code 255 in this case, and log a
warning. It ensure that the pidfd file descriptor is closed if this
error occurs.
Capturing exceptions into names can lead to reference cycles though the __traceback__ attribute of the exceptions in some obscure cases that have been reported previously and fixed individually. As these variables are not used anyway, we can remove the binding to reduce the chances of creating reference cycles.
See for example GH-13135
Zackery Spytz
Wansoo Kim
Yurii Karabas
Alex Grönholm
Diogo Dutra
Andrew Svetlov
Jakub Stasiak
Victor Stinner
Shantanu
Ben Darnell
Elvis Pranskevichus
Cleber Rosa
James Weaver
Vinay Sharma
Tony Solomonik
Rémi Lapeyre
Kyle Stanley
Fantix King
Kunal Bhalla
Chris Jerdonek
romasku
Galden
Lidi Zheng
Markus Mohrhard
idomic
Batuhan Taşkaya
Hill Ma
Pablo Galindo
Benjamin Peterson