content-type to application/x-www-form-urlencoded only when the method
is POST. Ditto for when the content-type is unrecognized -- only
fall back to urlencoded with POST.
I noticed while watching (with lsof) my forking SocketServer app running
that I would get multiple processes listening to the socket. For the most
part, this doesn't hurt things, but if you terminate the server, this can
prevent it from restarting because it cannot bind to the port due to any
running children which also have the socket open. The following one-liner
fixes this.
meaningful return values: respectively, whether the copy was done, and
the list of files that were copied. This meant some trivial changes in
core.py as well: the Command methods that mirror 'copy_file()' and
'copy_tree()' have to pass on their return values.
of the 'install_py' command rather than 'build_py'. Obviously, this
meant that the 'build_py' and 'install_py' modules had to change; less
obviously, so did 'install' and 'build', since these higher-level
commands must make options available to control the lower-level
commands, and some compilation-related options had to migrate with the
code.
(1) Fix reference to pwd.error to be KeyError -- there is no pwd.error
and pwd.getpwnam() raises KeyError on failure.
(2) Add cookie support, by placing the 'Cookie:' header, if present,
in the HTTP_COOKIE environment variable.
Two problems: The SMTPRecipientsRefused class should not inherit
SMTPResponseException, since it doesn't provide the smtp_code and
smtp_error attributes. My patch for not adding an extra CRLF was
apparently forgotten. The enclosed patch fixes these two problems.
terminated; this makes the final assert in the self-test code fail if
the parent runs faster than the children. Fix this by calling wait()
on the remaining children instead.
1. Jack Jansen reports that on the Mac, the time may be negative, and
solves this by adding a write32u() function that writes an unsigned
long.
2. On 64-bit platforms the CRC comparison fails; I've fixed this by
casting both values to be compared to "unsigned long" i.e. modulo
0x100000000L.
unsupported format string. (I guess this is because the logic for
deciding whether to reallocate the buffer or not has been improved.)
This caused the test code to crash on result[0]. Fix this by assuming
an empty result also means the format is not supported.
than was worth it: when deleting a canvas item, it would try to
automatically delete the bindings for that item. Since there's
nothing that says you can't reuse the tag and still have the bindings,
this is not correct. Also, it broke at least one demo
(Demo/tkinter/matt/rubber-band-box-demo-1.py).
so the preferred name for them is tag_lower, tag_raise
(similar to tag_bind, and similar to the Text widget);
unfortunately can't delete the old ones yet (maybe in 1.6)
Per writes:
"""
The application where Signum Support uses smtplib needs to be able to
report good error messages to the user when sending email fails. To
help in diagnosing problems it is useful to be able to report the
entire message sent by the server, not only the SMTP error code of the
offending command.
A lot of the functions in sendmail.py unfortunately discards the
message, leaving only the code. The enclosed patch fixes that
problem.
The enclosed patch also introduces a base class for exceptions that
include an SMTP error code and error message, and make the code and
message available on separate attributes, so that surrounding code can
deal with them in whatever way it sees fit. I've also added some
documentation to the exception classes.
The constructor will now raise an exception if it cannot connect to
the SMTP server.
The data() method will raise an SMTPDataError if it doesn't receive
the expected 354 code in the middle of the exchange.
According to section 5.2.10 of RFC 1123 a smtp client must accept "any
text, including no text at all" after the error code. If the response
of a HELO command contains no text self.helo_resp will be set to the
empty string (""). The patch fixes the test in the sendmail() method
so that helo_resp is tested against None; if it has the empty string
as value the sendmail() method would invoke the helo() method again.
The code no longer accepts a -1 reply from the ehlo() method in
sendmail().
[Text about removing SMTPRecipientsRefused deleted --GvR]
"""
and also:
"""
smtplib.py appends an extra blank line to the outgoing mail if the
`msg' argument to the sendmail method already contains a trailing
newline. This patch should fix the problem.
"""
The Dragon writes:
"""
Mostly I just re-added the SMTPRecipientsRefused exception
(the exeption object now has the appropriate info in it ) [Per had
removed this in his patch --GvR] and tweaked the behavior of the
sendmail method whence it throws the newly added SMTPHeloException (it
was closing the connection, which it shouldn't. whatever catches the
exception should do that. )
I pondered the change of the return values to tuples all around,
and after some thinking I decided that regularizing the return values was
too much of the Right Thing (tm) to not do.
My one concern is that code expecting an integer & getting a tuple
may fail silently.
(i.e. if it's doing :
x.somemethod() >= 400:
expecting an integer, the expression will always be true if it gets a
tuple instead. )
However, most smtplib code I've seen only really uses the
sendmail() method, so this wouldn't bother it. Usually code I've seen
that calls the other methods usually only calls helo() and ehlo() for
doing ESMTP, a feature which was not in the smtplib included with 1.5.1,
and thus I would think not much code uses it yet.
"""
splitunc() parses UNC paths. The contributor of the UNC parsing in
splitdrive() doesn't like it, but I haven't heard a good reason to
keep it, and it causes some problems. (I think there's a
philosophical problem -- to me, the split*() functions are purely
syntactical, and the fact that \\foo is not a valid path doesn't mean
that it shouldn't be considered an absolute path.)
Also (quite separately, but strangely related to the philosophical
issue above) fix abspath() so that if win32api exists, it doesn't fail
when the path doesn't actually exist -- if GetFullPathName() fails,
fall back on the old strategy (join with getcwd() if neccessary, and
then use normpath()).
and dry-run flags consistently painless): 'execute()', 'mkpath()',
'copy_file()', 'copy_tree()', 'make_file()', and stub for 'make_files()'
(not sure yet if it's useful).
that wrap them in the Command class).
Fixed 'copy_file()' to use '_copy_file_contents()', not 'copyfile()'
from shutil module -- no reference to shutil anymore.
Added "not copying" announcement in 'copy_file()'.
Wee comment fix.
If you send something like "PUT / HTTP/1.0" to something derived from
BaseHTTPServer that doesn't define do_PUT, you will get a response
that begins like this:
HTTP/1.0 501 Unsupported method ('do_PUT')
Server: SimpleHTTP/0.3 Python/1.5
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 18:53:53 GMT
The server should complain about 'PUT' instead of 'do_PUT'. This
patch should fix the problem.
"""
- It needlessly used the makefile() method for each response that is
read from the SMTP server.
- If the remote SMTP server closes the connection unexpectedly the
code raised an IndexError. It now raises an SMTPServerDisconnected
exception instead.
- The code now checks that all lines in a multiline response actually
contains an error code.
"""
The Dragon approves.
allow using the 'a' flag as a mode for opening a GzipFile. gzip
files, surprisingly enough, can be concatenated and then decompressed;
the effect is to concatenate the two chunks of data.
If we support it on writing, it should also be supported on reading.
This *wasn't* trivial, and required rearranging the code in the
reading path, particularly the _read() method.
Raise IOError instead of RuntimeError in two cases, 'Not a gzipped file'
and 'Unknown compression method'
If a filename on Windows starts with \\, it is converted to a URL
which starts with ////. If this URL is passed to urlparse.urlparse
you get a path that starts with // (and an empty netloc). If you pass
the result back to urlparse.urlunparse, you get a URL that starts with
//, which is parsed differently by urlparse.urlparse. The fix is to
add the (empty) netloc with accompanying slashes if the path in
urlunparse starts with //. Do this for all schemes that use a netloc.
Pathnames of files on other hosts in the same domain
(\\host\path\to\file) are not translated correctly to URLs and back.
The URL should be something like file:////host/path/to/file.
Note that a combination of drive letter and remote host is not
possible.
netloc from the base url as the default netloc for the resulting url
even if the schemes differ.
Once upon a time, when the web was wild, this was a valuable hack
because some people had a URL referencing an ftp server colocated with
an http server without having the host in the ftp URL (so they could
replicate it or change the hostname easily).
More recently, after the file: scheme got added back to the list of
schemes that accept a netloc, it turns out that this caused weirdness
when joining an http: URL with a file: URL -- the resulting file: URL
would always inherit the host from the http: URL because the file:
scheme supports a netloc but in practice never has one.
There are two reasons to get rid of the old, once-valuable hack,
instead of removing the file: scheme from the uses_netloc list. One,
the RFC says that file: uses the netloc syntax, and does not endorse
the old hack. Two, neither netscape 4.5 nor IE 4.0 support the old
hack.
An attempt to execute grid_slaves with arguments (0,0) results in
*all* of the slaves being returned, not just the slave associated with
row 0, column 0. This is because the test for arguments in the method
does not test to see if row (and column) does not equal None, but
rather just whether is evaluates to non-false. A value of 0 fails
this test.
The module cmd requires for each do_xxx command a help_xxx
function. I think this is a little old fashioned.
Here is a patch: use the docstring as help if no help_xxx
function can be found.
[I'm tempted to rip out all the help_* functions from pdb, but I'll
resist it. Any takers? --Guido]