* Use _PyUnicode_Copy in sanitize_isoformat_str
* Use repr in fromisoformat error message
This reverses commit 67b74a98b2 per Serhiy Storchaka's suggestion:
I suggested to use %R in the error message because including the raw
string can be confusing in the case of empty string, or string
containing trailing whitespaces, invisible or unprintable characters.
We agree that it is better to change both the C and pure Python versions
to use repr.
* Retain non-sanitized dtstr for error printing
This does not create an extra string, it just holds on to a reference to
the original input string for purposes of creating the error message.
* PEP 7 fixes to from_isoformat
* Separate handling of Unicode and other errors
In the initial implementation, errors other than encoding errors would
both raise an error indicating an invalid format, which would not be
true for errors like MemoryError.
* Drop needs_decref from _sanitize_isoformat_str
Instead _sanitize_isoformat_str returns a new reference, even to the
original string.
The current C implementations **crash** if the input includes a surrogate
Unicode code point, which is not possible to encode in UTF-8.
Important notes:
1. It is possible to pass a non-UTF-8 string as a separator to the
`.isoformat()` methods.
2. The pure-Python `datetime.fromisoformat()` implementation accepts
strings with a surrogate as the separator.
In `datetime.fromisoformat()`, in the special case of non-UTF-8 separators,
this implementation will take a performance hit by making a copy of the
input string and replacing the separator with 'T'.
Co-authored-by: Alexey Izbyshev <izbyshev@ispras.ru>
Co-authored-by: Paul Ganssle <paul@ganssle.io>
On Windows, passing a negative value to local results in an OSError because localtime_s on Windows does not support negative timestamps. Unfortunately this means that fold detection for timestamps between 0 and max_fold_seconds will result in this OSError since we subtract max_fold_seconds from the timestamp to detect a fold. However, since we know there haven't been any folds in the interval [0, max_fold_seconds) in any timezone, we can hackily just forego fold detection for this time range on Windows.
A datetime object d is aware if d.tzinfo is not None and
d.tzinfo.utcoffset(d) does not return None. If d.tzinfo is None,
or if d.tzinfo is not None but d.tzinfo.utcoffset(d) returns None,
d is naive.
This commit ensures that instances with non-None d.tzinfo, but
d.tzinfo.utcoffset(d) returning None are treated as naive.
In addition, C acceleration code will raise TypeError if
d.tzinfo.utcoffset(d) returns an object with the type other than
timedelta.
* Updated the documentation.
Assume that the term "naive" is defined elsewhere and remove the
not entirely correct clarification. Thanks, Tim.
* Added a test case for strftime("%z").
The added test checks a case with UTC offest expressed in an integer
number of seconds.
* Added a test comparing naive and aware datetimes.
Check that a greater than comparison of a naive datetime instance with
an aware one raises a TypeError.
* Test datetime in fold or in gap comparison both ways.
* Add timezone to datetime C API
* Add documentation for timezone C API macros
* Add dedicated tests for datetime type check macros
* Remove superfluous C API test
* Drop support for TimeZoneType in datetime C API
* Expose UTC singleton to the datetime C API
* Update datetime C-API documentation to include links
* Add reference count information for timezone constructors
* Add tests for date subclass alternate constructors
* Switch over alternate date constructors to fast path
* Switch datetime constructors to fastpath, fix bpo-32404
* Add fast path for datetime in date subclass constructor
* Set fold in constructor in datetime.combine
* Add news entries.
* Closes issue bpo-5288: Allow tzinfo objects with sub-minute offsets.
* bpo-5288: Implemented %z formatting of sub-minute offsets.
* bpo-5288: Removed mentions of the whole minute limitation on TZ offsets.
* bpo-5288: Removed one more mention of the whole minute limitation.
Thanks @csabella!
* Fix a formatting error in the docs
* Addressed review comments.
Thanks, @haypo.
Several 32-bit systems have issues with transitions in the year
2037. This is a bug in the system C library since time_t does not
overflow until 2038, but let's skip tests starting from 2037 to work
around those bugs.
Revert:
"Always test datetime.strftime("%4Y")
Issue #13305: Always test datetime.datetime.strftime("%4Y") for years < 1900."
In fact, strftime("%4Y") fails on most platforms.
Added an optional argument timespec to the datetime isoformat() method
to choose the precision of the time component.
Original patch by Alessandro Cucci.