of this test. It probably still requires more disk space
than most buildbots have, and in any case is still so
intrusive that if we don't find another way to test this I'm
taking my buildbot offline permanently ;-)
This will hopefully get the buildbots to pass. Not sure this
test will be feasible or even work. But everything is red now,
so it can't get much worse.
arguments in reverse, the interpreter would infinitely recourse trying to get a
coercion that worked. So put in a recursion check after a coercion is made and
the next call to attempt to use the coerced values.
Fixes bug #992017 and closes crashers/coerce.py .
Heavily revised, comprising revisions:
46640 - original trunk revision (backed out in r46655)
46647 - markup fix (backed out in r46655)
46692:46918 merged from branch aimacintyre-sf1454481
branch tested on buildbots (Windows buildbots had problems
not related to these changes).
when running with -O.
test_simple_validation_error still fails under -O. That appears to be because
wsgiref's validate.py uses `assert` statements all over the place to check
arguments for sanity. That should all be changed (it's not a logical error
in the software if a user passes bogus arguments, so this isn't a reasonable
use for `assert` -- checking external preconditions should generally raise
ValueError or TypeError instead, as appropriate).
a search path setup, some of these hosts resolve to the wrong address.
By appending a period to the hostname, the hostname should only resolve
to what we want it to resolve to. Hopefully this doesn't break different bots.
Also add more info to failure message to aid debugging test failure.
a search path setup, some of these hosts resolve to the wrong address.
By appending a period to the hostname, the hostname should only resolve
to what we want it to resolve to. Hopefully this doesn't break different bots.
clean up files and directories the tests often leave behind by
mistake. This is the first time in history I don't have a bogus
"db_home" directory after running the tests ;-)
Also worked on runtest's docstring, to say something about all the
arguments, and to document the non-obvious return values.
New functions runtest_inner() and cleanup_test_droppings() in
support of the above.
run immediately after test_file. At least 8 buildbot
boxes passed since the underlying problem got fixed,
and they all failed before the fix, so there's no point
to this anymore.
test clean up after itself appears to fix the test failures
when test_optparse follows test_file.
test_main(): Get rid of TESTFN no matter what. That's
also enough to fix the mystery failures. Doesn't hurt
to fix them twice :-)
Since test_file is implicated in mysterious test failures
when followed by test_optparse, if I had any brains I'd
look at the checkin that last changed test_file ;-)
the char buffer was requested. Now it actually returns the char buffer if
available or raises a TypeError if it isn't (as is raised for the other buffer
types if they are not present but requested).
Not a backport candidate since it does change semantics of the buffer object
(although it could be argued this is enough of a bug to bother backporting).
Neal Norwitz
Tim Peters
Ronald Oussoren
Fred Drake
Brett Cannon
Andrew MacIntyre
Ka-Ping Yee
Phillip J. Eby
Greg Ward
Georg Brandl
Andrew M. Kuchling