Commit Graph

21 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Samuele Pedroni 8036c83630 adding passing test. testing for g(*Nothing()) where Nothing is a user-defined iterator. 2004-02-21 21:03:30 +00:00
Raymond Hettinger 40174c358f SF bug #733667: kwargs handled incorrectly
The fast_function() inlining optimization only
applies when there are zero keyword arguments.
2003-05-31 07:04:16 +00:00
Guido van Rossum 68468eba63 Get rid of many apply() calls. 2003-02-27 20:14:51 +00:00
Barry Warsaw 408b6d34de Complete the absolute import patch for the test suite. All relative
imports of test modules now import from the test package.  Other
related oddities are also fixed (like DeprecationWarning filters that
weren't specifying the full import part, etc.).  Also did a general
code cleanup to remove all "from test.test_support import *"'s.  Other
from...import *'s weren't changed.
2002-07-30 23:27:12 +00:00
Barry Warsaw 191487351a Quick and dirty fix for test_extcall failures trigged by Guido's
recent classobject.c change.  When calling an unbound method with no
instances as first argument, the error message has changed.  The
message now contains the class name, but the output text being
compared to is too generic, so skip printing it.
2001-08-24 19:11:57 +00:00
Tim Peters 2f228e75e4 Get rid of the superstitious "~" in dict hashing's "i = (~hash) & mask".
The comment following used to say:
	/* We use ~hash instead of hash, as degenerate hash functions, such
	   as for ints <sigh>, can have lots of leading zeros. It's not
	   really a performance risk, but better safe than sorry.
	   12-Dec-00 tim:  so ~hash produces lots of leading ones instead --
	   what's the gain? */
That is, there was never a good reason for doing it.  And to the contrary,
as explained on Python-Dev last December, it tended to make the *sum*
(i + incr) & mask (which is the first table index examined in case of
collison) the same "too often" across distinct hashes.

Changing to the simpler "i = hash & mask" reduced the number of string-dict
collisions (== # number of times we go around the lookup for-loop) from about
6 million to 5 million during a full run of the test suite (these are
approximate because the test suite does some random stuff from run to run).
The number of collisions in non-string dicts also decreased, but not as
dramatically.

Note that this may, for a given dict, change the order (wrt previous
releases) of entries exposed by .keys(), .values() and .items().  A number
of std tests suffered bogus failures as a result.  For dicts keyed by
small ints, or (less so) by characters, the order is much more likely to be
in increasing order of key now; e.g.,

>>> d = {}
>>> for i in range(10):
...    d[i] = i
...
>>> d
{0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 4, 5: 5, 6: 6, 7: 7, 8: 8, 9: 9}
>>>

Unfortunately. people may latch on to that in small examples and draw a
bogus conclusion.

test_support.py
    Moved test_extcall's sortdict() into test_support, made it stronger,
    and imported sortdict into other std tests that needed it.
test_unicode.py
    Excluced cp875 from the "roundtrip over range(128)" test, because
    cp875 doesn't have a well-defined inverse for unicode("?", "cp875").
    See Python-Dev for excruciating details.
Cookie.py
    Chaged various output functions to sort dicts before building
    strings from them.
test_extcall
    Fiddled the expected-result file.  This remains sensitive to native
    dict ordering, because, e.g., if there are multiple errors in a
    keyword-arg dict (and test_extcall sets up many cases like that), the
    specific error Python complains about first depends on native dict
    ordering.
2001-05-13 00:19:31 +00:00
Tim Peters 6912d4ddf0 Generalize tuple() to work nicely with iterators.
NEEDS DOC CHANGES.
This one surprised me!  While I expected tuple() to be a no-brainer, turns
out it's actually dripping with consequences:
1. It will *allow* the popular PySequence_Fast() to work with any iterable
   object (code for that not yet checked in, but should be trivial).
2. It caused two std tests to fail.  This because some places used
   PyTuple_Sequence() (the C spelling of tuple()) as an indirect way to test
   whether something *is* a sequence.  But tuple() code only looked for the
   existence of sq->item to determine that, and e.g. an instance passed
   that test whether or not it supported the other operations tuple()
   needed (e.g., __len__).  So some things the tests *expected* to fail
   with an AttributeError now fail with a TypeError instead.  This looks
   like an improvement to me; e.g., test_coercion used to produce 559
   TypeErrors and 2 AttributeErrors, and now they're all TypeErrors.  The
   error details are more informative too, because the places calling this
   were *looking* for TypeErrors in order to replace the generic tuple()
   "not a sequence" msg with their own more specific text, and
   AttributeErrors snuck by that.
2001-05-05 03:56:37 +00:00
Jeremy Hylton ceccc3c037 Test cases for examples of ext call error handling.
Fix to SF bug #414743 based on Michael Hudson's patch #414750.
2001-04-11 13:53:35 +00:00
Eric S. Raymond fc170b1fd5 String method conversion. 2001-02-09 11:51:27 +00:00
Tim Peters 08dabf0a73 Patch #103344: Sort dicts from extcall for easier comparison with Jython. 2001-01-21 18:52:02 +00:00
Fredrik Lundh f785042433 a bold attempt to fix things broken by MAL's verify patch: import
'verify' iff it's used by a test module...
2001-01-17 21:51:36 +00:00
Marc-André Lemburg 3661908a6a This patch removes all uses of "assert" in the regression test suite
and replaces them with a new API verify(). As a result the regression
suite will also perform its tests in optimization mode.

Written by Marc-Andre Lemburg. Copyright assigned to Guido van Rossum.
2001-01-17 19:11:13 +00:00
Ka-Ping Yee 2057970601 This patch makes sure that the function name always appears in the error
message, and tries to make the messages more consistent and helpful when
the wrong number of arguments or duplicate keyword arguments are supplied.
Comes with more tests for test_extcall.py and and an update to an error
message in test/output/test_pyexpat.
2001-01-15 22:14:16 +00:00
Fred Drake 1a7aab70d1 When a PyCFunction that takes only positional parameters is called with
an empty keywords dictionary (via apply() or the extended call syntax),
the keywords dict should be ignored.  If the keywords dict is not empty,
TypeError should be raised.  (Between the restructuring of the call
machinery and this patch, an empty dict in this situation would trigger
a SystemError via PyErr_BadInternalCall().)

Added regression tests to detect errors for this.
2001-01-04 22:33:02 +00:00
Jeremy Hylton 6b4ec5135b Fix for SF bug #117241
When a method is called with no regular arguments and * args, defer
the first arg is subclass check until after the * args have been
expanded.

N.B. The CALL_FUNCTION implementation is getting really hairy; should
review it to see if it can be simplified.
2000-10-30 17:15:20 +00:00
Fred Drake 004d5e6880 Make reindent.py happy (convert everything to 4-space indents!). 2000-10-23 17:22:08 +00:00
Vladimir Marangozov 5ff2ac2fa9 Break a cycle created in the saboteur() function. 2000-07-15 00:42:09 +00:00
Guido van Rossum 4b49101f20 Don't be so strict in checking AttributeError -- the error message
recently changed.
2000-04-10 13:37:14 +00:00
Jeremy Hylton 074c3e62d1 Two fixes for extended call syntax:
If a non-tuple sequence is passed as the *arg, convert it to a tuple
before checking its length.
If named keyword arguments are used in combination with **kwargs, make
a copy of kwargs before inserting the new keys.
2000-03-30 23:55:31 +00:00
Jeremy Hylton 003663d783 fix previous checkin 2000-03-28 23:53:22 +00:00
Jeremy Hylton aed0d8deb0 add test cases for Greg Ewing's extended call syntax patch 2000-03-28 23:51:17 +00:00