traverseda
/
cpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

SF bug 1066438: datetime.replace method description error 

Repair typo in example.
This commit is contained in:
Tim Peters 2004-11-15 03:50:16 +00:00
parent 6fe8f1928f
commit fdc58f2391
1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

14
Doc/lib/libdatetime.tex
View File

@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ This is exact, and cannot overflow. timedelta.seconds and
\item[(4)] \item[(4)]
In other words, \code{date1 < date2} In other words, \code{date1 < date2}
if and only if \code{\var{date1}.toordinal() < if and only if \code{\var{date1}.toordinal() <
\var{date2}.toordinal()}. \var{date2}.toordinal()}.
In order to stop comparison from falling back to the default In order to stop comparison from falling back to the default
scheme of comparing object addresses, date comparison scheme of comparing object addresses, date comparison
normally raises \exception{TypeError} if the other comparand normally raises \exception{TypeError} if the other comparand
@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ Instance methods:
Return a date with the same value, except for those members given Return a date with the same value, except for those members given
new values by whichever keyword arguments are specified. For new values by whichever keyword arguments are specified. For
example, if \code{d == date(2002, 12, 31)}, then example, if \code{d == date(2002, 12, 31)}, then
\code{d.replace(day=26) == date(2000, 12, 26)}. \code{d.replace(day=26) == date(2002, 12, 26)}.
\end{methoddesc} \end{methoddesc}
\begin{methoddesc}{timetuple}{} \begin{methoddesc}{timetuple}{}
@ -432,8 +432,8 @@ Instance methods:
0, and the DST flag is -1. 0, and the DST flag is -1.
\code{\var{d}.timetuple()} is equivalent to \code{\var{d}.timetuple()} is equivalent to
\code{time.struct_time((\var{d}.year, \var{d}.month, \var{d}.day, \code{time.struct_time((\var{d}.year, \var{d}.month, \var{d}.day,
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
\var{d}.weekday(), \var{d}.weekday(),
\var{d}.toordinal() - date(\var{d}.year, 1, 1).toordinal() + 1, \var{d}.toordinal() - date(\var{d}.year, 1, 1).toordinal() + 1,
-1))} -1))}
\end{methoddesc} \end{methoddesc}
@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ Instance methods:
year 2004 begins on Monday, 29 Dec 2003 and ends on Sunday, 4 Jan year 2004 begins on Monday, 29 Dec 2003 and ends on Sunday, 4 Jan
2004, so that 2004, so that
\code{date(2003, 12, 29).isocalendar() == (2004, 1, 1)} \code{date(2003, 12, 29).isocalendar() == (2004, 1, 1)}
and and
\code{date(2004, 1, 4).isocalendar() == (2004, 1, 7)}. \code{date(2004, 1, 4).isocalendar() == (2004, 1, 7)}.
\end{methoddesc} \end{methoddesc}
@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ Supported operations:
\lineii{\var{timedelta} = \var{datetime1} - \var{datetime2}}{(3)} \lineii{\var{timedelta} = \var{datetime1} - \var{datetime2}}{(3)}
\lineii{\var{datetime1} < \var{datetime2}} \lineii{\var{datetime1} < \var{datetime2}}
{Compares \class{datetime} to \class{datetime}. {Compares \class{datetime} to \class{datetime}.
(4)} (4)}
\end{tableii} \end{tableii}
@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ Supported operations:
\item[(4)] \item[(4)]
\var{datetime1} is considered less than \var{datetime2} \var{datetime1} is considered less than \var{datetime2}
when \var{datetime1} precedes \var{datetime2} in time. when \var{datetime1} precedes \var{datetime2} in time.
If one comparand is naive and If one comparand is naive and
the other is aware, \exception{TypeError} is raised. If both the other is aware, \exception{TypeError} is raised. If both