Bug #1566663: remove obsolete example from datetime docs.
This commit is contained in:
parent
3267d28f9d
commit
fb25773862
|
@ -1421,19 +1421,21 @@ The exact range of years for which \method{strftime()} works also
|
|||
varies across platforms. Regardless of platform, years before 1900
|
||||
cannot be used.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Examples}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Creating Datetime Objects from Formatted Strings}
|
||||
|
||||
The \class{datetime} class does not directly support parsing formatted time
|
||||
strings. You can use \function{time.strptime} to do the parsing and create
|
||||
a \class{datetime} object from the tuple it returns:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||||
>>> s = "2005-12-06T12:13:14"
|
||||
>>> from datetime import datetime
|
||||
>>> from time import strptime
|
||||
>>> datetime(*strptime(s, "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S")[0:6])
|
||||
datetime.datetime(2005, 12, 6, 12, 13, 14)
|
||||
\end{verbatim}
|
||||
|
||||
%%% This example is obsolete, since strptime is now supported by datetime.
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \subsection{Examples}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \subsubsection{Creating Datetime Objects from Formatted Strings}
|
||||
%
|
||||
% The \class{datetime} class does not directly support parsing formatted time
|
||||
% strings. You can use \function{time.strptime} to do the parsing and create
|
||||
% a \class{datetime} object from the tuple it returns:
|
||||
%
|
||||
% \begin{verbatim}
|
||||
% >>> s = "2005-12-06T12:13:14"
|
||||
% >>> from datetime import datetime
|
||||
% >>> from time import strptime
|
||||
% >>> datetime(*strptime(s, "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S")[0:6])
|
||||
% datetime.datetime(2005, 12, 6, 12, 13, 14)
|
||||
% \end{verbatim}
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ Tests
|
|||
Documentation
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
||||
- Bug #1566663: remove obsolete example from datetime docs.
|
||||
|
||||
- Bug #1541682: Fix example in the "Refcount details" API docs.
|
||||
Additionally, remove a faulty example showing PySequence_SetItem applied
|
||||
to a newly created list object and add notes that this isn't a good idea.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue