Issue #13623: Fix a performance regression introduced by issue #12170 in

bytes.find() and handle correctly OverflowError (raise the same ValueError than
the error for -1).
This commit is contained in:
Victor Stinner 2011-12-18 01:17:41 +01:00
parent e010fc029d
commit f8eac00779
2 changed files with 23 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -362,6 +362,11 @@ class BaseBytesTest(unittest.TestCase):
self.assertEqual(b.find(i, 1, 3), 1)
self.assertEqual(b.find(w, 1, 3), -1)
for index in (-1, 256, sys.maxsize + 1):
self.assertRaisesRegex(
ValueError, r'byte must be in range\(0, 256\)',
b.find, index)
def test_rfind(self):
b = self.type2test(b'mississippi')
i = 105

View File

@ -186,27 +186,34 @@ STRINGLIB(parse_args_finds_byte)(const char *function_name, PyObject *args,
{
PyObject *tmp_subobj;
Py_ssize_t ival;
PyObject *err;
if(!STRINGLIB(parse_args_finds)(function_name, args, &tmp_subobj,
start, end))
return 0;
ival = PyNumber_AsSsize_t(tmp_subobj, PyExc_ValueError);
if (ival == -1 && PyErr_Occurred()) {
PyErr_Clear();
if (!PyNumber_Check(tmp_subobj)) {
*subobj = tmp_subobj;
return 1;
}
else {
/* The first argument was an integer */
if(ival < 0 || ival > 255) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "byte must be in range(0, 256)");
return 0;
ival = PyNumber_AsSsize_t(tmp_subobj, PyExc_OverflowError);
if (ival == -1) {
err = PyErr_Occurred();
if (err && !PyErr_GivenExceptionMatches(err, PyExc_OverflowError)) {
PyErr_Clear();
*subobj = tmp_subobj;
return 1;
}
*subobj = NULL;
*byte = (char)ival;
}
if (ival < 0 || ival > 255) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "byte must be in range(0, 256)");
return 0;
}
*subobj = NULL;
*byte = (char)ival;
return 1;
}