Merged revisions 76300 via svnmerge from
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk ........ r76300 | mark.dickinson | 2009-11-15 13:12:43 +0000 (Sun, 15 Nov 2009) | 3 lines Issue #5792: Extend short float repr support to x86 platforms using suncc or icc. Many thanks Stefan Krah for help and OpenSolaris testing. ........
This commit is contained in:
parent
b43dbc26f9
commit
f4243f6d1f
|
@ -358,6 +358,9 @@ Extension Modules
|
|||
Build
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
- Issue #5792: Extend the short float repr support to x86 systems using
|
||||
icc or suncc.
|
||||
|
||||
- Issue #6603: Change READ_TIMESTAMP macro in ceval.c so that it
|
||||
compiles correctly under gcc on x86-64. This fixes a reported
|
||||
problem with the --with-tsc build on x86-64.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -22945,15 +22945,15 @@ fi
|
|||
# correctly-rounded string <-> double conversion functions from
|
||||
# Python/dtoa.c, which in turn require that the FPU uses 53-bit
|
||||
# rounding; this is a problem on x86, where the x87 FPU has a default
|
||||
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we try to fix this by
|
||||
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we can fix this by
|
||||
# using inline assembler to get and set the x87 FPU control word.
|
||||
if test "$GCC" = yes && test -n "`$CC -dM -E - </dev/null | grep i386`"
|
||||
then
|
||||
# Check that it's okay to use gcc inline assembler to get and set
|
||||
# x87 control word. It should be, but you never know...
|
||||
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word" >&5
|
||||
|
||||
# This inline assembler syntax may also work for suncc and icc,
|
||||
# so we try it on all platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word" >&5
|
||||
echo $ECHO_N "checking whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word... $ECHO_C" >&6; }
|
||||
cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
|
||||
cat >conftest.$ac_ext <<_ACEOF
|
||||
/* confdefs.h. */
|
||||
_ACEOF
|
||||
cat confdefs.h >>conftest.$ac_ext
|
||||
|
@ -22964,9 +22964,9 @@ int
|
|||
main ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned short cw;
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
|
||||
unsigned short cw;
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
|
||||
|
||||
;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -22998,16 +22998,15 @@ sed 's/^/| /' conftest.$ac_ext >&5
|
|||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
rm -f core conftest.err conftest.$ac_objext conftest.$ac_ext
|
||||
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $have_gcc_asm_for_x87" >&5
|
||||
{ echo "$as_me:$LINENO: result: $have_gcc_asm_for_x87" >&5
|
||||
echo "${ECHO_T}$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" >&6; }
|
||||
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
|
||||
then
|
||||
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
|
||||
then
|
||||
|
||||
cat >>confdefs.h <<\_ACEOF
|
||||
#define HAVE_GCC_ASM_FOR_X87 1
|
||||
_ACEOF
|
||||
|
||||
fi
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Detect whether system arithmetic is subject to x87-style double
|
||||
|
|
33
configure.in
33
configure.in
|
@ -3191,25 +3191,24 @@ fi
|
|||
# correctly-rounded string <-> double conversion functions from
|
||||
# Python/dtoa.c, which in turn require that the FPU uses 53-bit
|
||||
# rounding; this is a problem on x86, where the x87 FPU has a default
|
||||
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we try to fix this by
|
||||
# rounding precision of 64 bits. For gcc/x86, we can fix this by
|
||||
# using inline assembler to get and set the x87 FPU control word.
|
||||
if test "$GCC" = yes && test -n "`$CC -dM -E - </dev/null | grep i386`"
|
||||
|
||||
# This inline assembler syntax may also work for suncc and icc,
|
||||
# so we try it on all platforms.
|
||||
|
||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word)
|
||||
AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [
|
||||
unsigned short cw;
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
|
||||
],
|
||||
[have_gcc_asm_for_x87=yes], [have_gcc_asm_for_x87=no])
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT($have_gcc_asm_for_x87)
|
||||
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
|
||||
then
|
||||
# Check that it's okay to use gcc inline assembler to get and set
|
||||
# x87 control word. It should be, but you never know...
|
||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word)
|
||||
AC_TRY_COMPILE([], [
|
||||
unsigned short cw;
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fnstcw %0" : "=m" (cw));
|
||||
__asm__ __volatile__ ("fldcw %0" : : "m" (cw));
|
||||
],
|
||||
[have_gcc_asm_for_x87=yes], [have_gcc_asm_for_x87=no])
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT($have_gcc_asm_for_x87)
|
||||
if test "$have_gcc_asm_for_x87" = yes
|
||||
then
|
||||
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GCC_ASM_FOR_X87, 1,
|
||||
[Define if we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word])
|
||||
fi
|
||||
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GCC_ASM_FOR_X87, 1,
|
||||
[Define if we can use gcc inline assembler to get and set x87 control word])
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
# Detect whether system arithmetic is subject to x87-style double
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue