Fix some silly uses of KEYS, ITEMS, VALUES.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b69b2e59f6
commit
eff072c66c
|
@ -1869,9 +1869,9 @@ static PyObject *dictkeys_new(PyObject *);
|
|||
static PyObject *dictitems_new(PyObject *);
|
||||
static PyObject *dictvalues_new(PyObject *);
|
||||
|
||||
PyDoc_STRVAR(KEYS__doc__, "D.KEYS() -> a set-like object for D's keys");
|
||||
PyDoc_STRVAR(ITEMS__doc__, "D.ITEMS() -> a set-like object for D's items");
|
||||
PyDoc_STRVAR(VALUES__doc__, "D.VALUES() -> a set-like object for D's values");
|
||||
PyDoc_STRVAR(keys__doc__, "D.keys() -> a set-like object for D's keys");
|
||||
PyDoc_STRVAR(items__doc__, "D.items() -> a set-like object for D's items");
|
||||
PyDoc_STRVAR(values__doc__, "D.values() -> a set-like object for D's values");
|
||||
|
||||
static PyMethodDef mapp_methods[] = {
|
||||
{"__contains__",(PyCFunction)dict_contains, METH_O | METH_COEXIST,
|
||||
|
@ -1895,11 +1895,11 @@ static PyMethodDef mapp_methods[] = {
|
|||
values__doc__},
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
{"keys", (PyCFunction)dictkeys_new, METH_NOARGS,
|
||||
KEYS__doc__},
|
||||
keys__doc__},
|
||||
{"items", (PyCFunction)dictitems_new, METH_NOARGS,
|
||||
ITEMS__doc__},
|
||||
items__doc__},
|
||||
{"values", (PyCFunction)dictvalues_new, METH_NOARGS,
|
||||
VALUES__doc__},
|
||||
values__doc__},
|
||||
{"update", (PyCFunction)dict_update, METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS,
|
||||
update__doc__},
|
||||
{"fromkeys", (PyCFunction)dict_fromkeys, METH_VARARGS | METH_CLASS,
|
||||
|
@ -2389,8 +2389,6 @@ PyTypeObject PyDictIterItem_Type = {
|
|||
/* View objects for keys(), items(), values(). */
|
||||
/***********************************************/
|
||||
|
||||
/* While this is incomplete, we use KEYS(), ITEMS(), VALUES(). */
|
||||
|
||||
/* The instance lay-out is the same for all three; but the type differs. */
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue