The im_class of unbound class methods is actually not the same as im_self.

This commit is contained in:
Georg Brandl 2013-04-14 11:53:36 +02:00
parent d4c45a91b7
commit e7fb7008ba
1 changed files with 4 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -623,9 +623,8 @@ Callable types
single: im_self (method attribute)
When a user-defined method object is created by retrieving a class method object
from a class or instance, its :attr:`im_self` attribute is the class itself (the
same as the :attr:`im_class` attribute), and its :attr:`im_func` attribute is
the function object underlying the class method.
from a class or instance, its :attr:`im_self` attribute is the class itself, and
its :attr:`im_func` attribute is the function object underlying the class method.
When an unbound user-defined method object is called, the underlying function
(:attr:`im_func`) is called, with the restriction that the first argument must
@ -797,8 +796,8 @@ Classes
associated class is either :class:`C` or one of its base classes, it is
transformed into an unbound user-defined method object whose :attr:`im_class`
attribute is :class:`C`. When it would yield a class method object, it is
transformed into a bound user-defined method object whose :attr:`im_class`
and :attr:`im_self` attributes are both :class:`C`. When it would yield a
transformed into a bound user-defined method object whose
:attr:`im_self` attribute is :class:`C`. When it would yield a
static method object, it is transformed into the object wrapped by the static
method object. See section :ref:`descriptors` for another way in which
attributes retrieved from a class may differ from those actually contained in