Issue #14626: Fix buildbot issue on OpenIndiana 3.x machines. (Hopefully.)

This commit is contained in:
Larry Hastings 2012-06-22 19:50:21 -07:00
parent fafd9eeef0
commit dbbc0c8bb3
2 changed files with 26 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -179,16 +179,27 @@ if _exists("_have_functions"):
_set = set() _set = set()
_add("HAVE_FACCESSAT", "access") _add("HAVE_FACCESSAT", "access")
# Current linux (kernel 3.2, glibc 2.15) doesn't support lchmod. # Some platforms don't support lchmod(). Often the function exists
# (The function exists, but it's a stub that always returns ENOSUP.) # anyway, as a stub that always returns ENOSUP or perhaps EOPNOTSUPP.
# Now, linux *does* have fchmodat, which says it can ignore # (No, I don't know why that's a good design.) ./configure will detect
# symbolic links. But that doesn't work either (also returns ENOSUP). # this and reject it--so HAVE_LCHMOD still won't be defined on such
# I'm guessing that if they fix fchmodat, they'll also add lchmod at # platforms. This is Very Helpful.
# the same time. So, for now, assume that fchmodat doesn't support #
# follow_symlinks unless lchmod works. # However, sometimes platforms without a working lchmod() *do* have
if ((sys.platform != "linux") or # fchmodat(). (Examples: Linux kernel 3.2 with glibc 2.15,
("HAVE_LCHMOD" in _have_functions)): # OpenIndiana 3.x.) And fchmodat() has a flag that theoretically makes
_add("HAVE_FCHMODAT", "chmod") # it behave like lchmod(). So in theory it would be a suitable
# replacement for lchmod(). But when lchmod() doesn't work, fchmodat()'s
# flag doesn't work *either*. Sadly ./configure isn't sophisticated
# enough to detect this condition--it only determines whether or not
# fchmodat() minimally works.
#
# Therefore we simply ignore fchmodat() when deciding whether or not
# os.chmod supports follow_symlinks. Just checking lchmod() is
# sufficient. After all--if you have a working fchmodat(), your
# lchmod() almost certainly works too.
#
# _add("HAVE_FCHMODAT", "chmod")
_add("HAVE_FCHOWNAT", "chown") _add("HAVE_FCHOWNAT", "chown")
_add("HAVE_FSTATAT", "stat") _add("HAVE_FSTATAT", "stat")
_add("HAVE_LCHFLAGS", "chflags") _add("HAVE_LCHFLAGS", "chflags")

View File

@ -2696,7 +2696,8 @@ posix_chmod(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwargs)
/* /*
* fchmodat() doesn't currently support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW! * fchmodat() doesn't currently support AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW!
* The documentation specifically shows how to use it, * The documentation specifically shows how to use it,
* and then says it isn't implemented yet. (glibc 2.15) * and then says it isn't implemented yet.
* (true on linux with glibc 2.15, and openindiana 3.x)
* *
* Once it is supported, os.chmod will automatically * Once it is supported, os.chmod will automatically
* support dir_fd and follow_symlinks=False. (Hopefully.) * support dir_fd and follow_symlinks=False. (Hopefully.)
@ -2709,7 +2710,9 @@ posix_chmod(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwargs)
* and we can't do that in this nested scope. (Macro trickery, sigh.) * and we can't do that in this nested scope. (Macro trickery, sigh.)
*/ */
fchmodat_nofollow_unsupported = fchmodat_nofollow_unsupported =
result && (errno == ENOTSUP) && !follow_symlinks; result &&
((errno == ENOTSUP) || (errno == EOPNOTSUPP)) &&
!follow_symlinks;
} }
else else
#endif #endif