Comments.
This commit is contained in:
parent
064567e41a
commit
c23d18a955
|
@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ class Pickler:
|
|||
# This method does not use memoize() so that it can handle
|
||||
# the special case for non-binary mode.
|
||||
# XXX What did that comment mean? That is, what "special case for
|
||||
# XXX non-binary mode? It sure *looks* like nothing special is
|
||||
# XXX non-binary mode"? It sure *looks* like nothing special is
|
||||
# XXX happening in the INST case.
|
||||
memo_len = len(memo)
|
||||
if self.bin:
|
||||
|
@ -699,6 +699,14 @@ class Unpickler:
|
|||
except _Stop, stopinst:
|
||||
return stopinst.value
|
||||
|
||||
# Return largest index k such that self.stack[k] is self.mark.
|
||||
# If the stack doesn't contain a mark, eventually raises IndexError.
|
||||
# This could be sped by maintaining another stack, of indices at which
|
||||
# the mark appears. For that matter, the latter stack would suffice,
|
||||
# and we wouldn't need to push mark objects on self.stack at all.
|
||||
# Doing so is probably a good thing, though, since if the pickle is
|
||||
# corrupt (or hostile) we may get a clue from finding self.mark embedded
|
||||
# in unpickled objects.
|
||||
def marker(self):
|
||||
stack = self.stack
|
||||
mark = self.mark
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue