Remove misleading comment about type-class unification.
This commit is contained in:
parent
402cc242f0
commit
c01b6aeede
|
@ -1,12 +1,11 @@
|
|||
\section{Built-in Types \label{types}}
|
||||
|
||||
The following sections describe the standard types that are built into
|
||||
the interpreter. Historically, Python's built-in types have differed
|
||||
from user-defined types because it was not possible to use the built-in
|
||||
types as the basis for object-oriented inheritance. With the 2.2
|
||||
release this situation has started to change, although the intended
|
||||
unification of user-defined and built-in types is as yet far from
|
||||
complete.
|
||||
the interpreter.
|
||||
\note{Historically (until release 2.2), Python's built-in types have
|
||||
differed from user-defined types because it was not possible to use
|
||||
the built-in types as the basis for object-oriented inheritance.
|
||||
This limitation does not exist any longer.}
|
||||
|
||||
The principal built-in types are numerics, sequences, mappings, files
|
||||
classes, instances and exceptions.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue