Bug #1566663: remove obsolete example from datetime docs.
(backport from rev. 52063)
This commit is contained in:
parent
506cc189a9
commit
ad4e11e16d
|
@ -1421,19 +1421,21 @@ The exact range of years for which \method{strftime()} works also
|
||||||
varies across platforms. Regardless of platform, years before 1900
|
varies across platforms. Regardless of platform, years before 1900
|
||||||
cannot be used.
|
cannot be used.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Examples}
|
%%% This example is obsolete, since strptime is now supported by datetime.
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
\subsubsection{Creating Datetime Objects from Formatted Strings}
|
% \subsection{Examples}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
The \class{datetime} class does not directly support parsing formatted time
|
% \subsubsection{Creating Datetime Objects from Formatted Strings}
|
||||||
strings. You can use \function{time.strptime} to do the parsing and create
|
%
|
||||||
a \class{datetime} object from the tuple it returns:
|
% The \class{datetime} class does not directly support parsing formatted time
|
||||||
|
% strings. You can use \function{time.strptime} to do the parsing and create
|
||||||
\begin{verbatim}
|
% a \class{datetime} object from the tuple it returns:
|
||||||
>>> s = "2005-12-06T12:13:14"
|
%
|
||||||
>>> from datetime import datetime
|
% \begin{verbatim}
|
||||||
>>> from time import strptime
|
% >>> s = "2005-12-06T12:13:14"
|
||||||
>>> datetime(*strptime(s, "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S")[0:6])
|
% >>> from datetime import datetime
|
||||||
datetime.datetime(2005, 12, 6, 12, 13, 14)
|
% >>> from time import strptime
|
||||||
\end{verbatim}
|
% >>> datetime(*strptime(s, "%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S")[0:6])
|
||||||
|
% datetime.datetime(2005, 12, 6, 12, 13, 14)
|
||||||
|
% \end{verbatim}
|
||||||
|
%
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ Tests
|
||||||
Documentation
|
Documentation
|
||||||
-------------
|
-------------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Bug #1566663: remove obsolete example from datetime docs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Bug #1541682: Fix example in the "Refcount details" API docs.
|
- Bug #1541682: Fix example in the "Refcount details" API docs.
|
||||||
Additionally, remove a faulty example showing PySequence_SetItem applied
|
Additionally, remove a faulty example showing PySequence_SetItem applied
|
||||||
to a newly created list object and add notes that this isn't a good idea.
|
to a newly created list object and add notes that this isn't a good idea.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue