Vladimir Marangozov's explanatory message.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d895749b61
commit
a9ca42daf0
|
@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
|
||||||
|
Subject: Re: The metaclass saga using Python
|
||||||
|
From: Vladimir Marangozov <Vladimir.Marangozov@imag.fr>
|
||||||
|
To: tim_one@email.msn.com (Tim Peters)
|
||||||
|
Cc: python-list@cwi.nl
|
||||||
|
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:59:06 +0200 (DFT)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Tim]
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
> building-on-examples-tends-to-prevent-abstract-thrashing-ly y'rs - tim
|
||||||
|
>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
OK, I stand corrected. I understand that anybody's interpretation of
|
||||||
|
the meta-class concept is likely to be difficult to digest by others.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Here's another try, expressing the same thing, but using the Python
|
||||||
|
programming model, examples and, perhaps, more popular terms.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Classes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is pure Python of today. Sorry about the tutorial, but it is
|
||||||
|
meant to illustrate the second part, which is the one we're
|
||||||
|
interested in and which will follow the same development scenario.
|
||||||
|
Besides, newbies are likely to understand that the discussion is
|
||||||
|
affordable even for them :-)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
a) Class definition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A class is meant to define the common properties of a set of objects.
|
||||||
|
A class is a "package" of properties. The assembly of properties
|
||||||
|
in a class package is sometimes called a class structure (which isn't
|
||||||
|
always appropriate).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> class A:
|
||||||
|
attr1 = "Hello" # an attribute of A
|
||||||
|
def method1(self, *args): pass # method1 of A
|
||||||
|
def method2(self, *args): pass # method2 of A
|
||||||
|
>>>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So far, we defined the structure of the class A. The class A is
|
||||||
|
of type <class>. We can check this by asking Python: "what is A?"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> A # What is A?
|
||||||
|
<class __main__.A at 2023e360>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
b) Class instanciation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Creating an object with the properties defined in the class A is
|
||||||
|
called instanciation of the class A. After an instanciation of A, we
|
||||||
|
obtain a new object, called an instance, which has the properties
|
||||||
|
packaged in the class A.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> a = A() # 'a' is the 1st instance of A
|
||||||
|
>>> a # What is 'a'?
|
||||||
|
<__main__.A instance at 2022b9d0>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> b = A() # 'b' is another instance of A
|
||||||
|
>>> b # What is 'b'?
|
||||||
|
<__main__.A instance at 2022b9c0>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The objects, 'a' and 'b', are of type <instance> and they both have
|
||||||
|
the same properties. Note, that 'a' and 'b' are different objects.
|
||||||
|
(their adresses differ). This is a bit hard to see, so let's ask Python:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> a == b # Is 'a' the same object as 'b'?
|
||||||
|
0 # No.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Instance objects have one more special property, indicating the class
|
||||||
|
they are an instance of. This property is named __class__.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> a.__class__ # What is the class of 'a'?
|
||||||
|
<class __main__.A at 2023e360> # 'a' is an instance of A
|
||||||
|
>>> b.__class__ # What is the class of 'b'?
|
||||||
|
<class __main__.A at 2023e360> # 'b' is an instance of A
|
||||||
|
>>> a.__class__ == b.__class__ # Is it really the same class A?
|
||||||
|
1 # Yes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
c) Class inheritance (class composition and specialization)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Classes can be defined in terms of other existing classes (and only
|
||||||
|
classes! -- don't bug me on this now). Thus, we can compose property
|
||||||
|
packages and create new ones. We reuse the property set defined
|
||||||
|
in a class by defining a new class, which "inherits" from the former.
|
||||||
|
In other words, a class B which inherits from the class A, inherits
|
||||||
|
the properties defined in A, or, B inherits the structure of A.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the same time, at the definition of the new class B, we can enrich
|
||||||
|
the inherited set of properties by adding new ones and/or modify some
|
||||||
|
of the inherited properties.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> class B(A): # B inherits A's properties
|
||||||
|
attr2 = "World" # additional attr2
|
||||||
|
def method2(self, arg1): pass # method2 is redefined
|
||||||
|
def method3(self, *args): pass # additional method3
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> B # What is B?
|
||||||
|
<class __main__.B at 2023e500>
|
||||||
|
>>> B == A # Is B the same class as A?
|
||||||
|
0 # No.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Classes define one special property, indicating whether a class
|
||||||
|
inherits the properties of another class. This property is called
|
||||||
|
__bases__ and it contains a list (a tuple) of the classes the new
|
||||||
|
class inherits from. The classes from which a class is inheriting the
|
||||||
|
properties are called superclasses (in Python, we call them also --
|
||||||
|
base classes).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> A.__bases__ # Does A have any superclasses?
|
||||||
|
() # No.
|
||||||
|
>>> B.__bases__ # Does B have any superclasses?
|
||||||
|
(<class __main__.A at 2023e360>,) # Yes. It has one superclass.
|
||||||
|
>>> B.__bases__[0] == A # Is it really the class A?
|
||||||
|
1 # Yes, it is.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Congratulations on getting this far! This was the hard part.
|
||||||
|
Now, let's continue with the easy one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. Meta-classes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You have to admit, that an anonymous group of Python wizards are
|
||||||
|
not satisfied with the property packaging facilities presented above.
|
||||||
|
They say, that the Real-World bugs them with problems that cannot be
|
||||||
|
modelled successfully with classes. Or, that the way classes are
|
||||||
|
implemented in Python and the way classes and instances behave at
|
||||||
|
runtime isn't always appropriate for reproducing the Real-World's
|
||||||
|
behavior in a way that satisfies them.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Hence, what they want is the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
a) leave objects as they are (instances of classes)
|
||||||
|
b) leave classes as they are (property packages and object creators)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
BUT, at the same time:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
c) consider classes as being instances of mysterious objects.
|
||||||
|
d) label mysterious objects "meta-classes".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Easy, eh?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You may ask: "Why on earth do they want to do that?".
|
||||||
|
They answer: "Poor soul... Go and see how cruel the Real-World is!".
|
||||||
|
You - fuzzy: "OK, will do!"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
And here we go for another round of what I said in section 1 -- Classes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
However, be warned! The features we're going to talk about aren't fully
|
||||||
|
implemented yet, because the Real-World don't let wizards to evaluate
|
||||||
|
precisely how cruel it is, so the features are still highly-experimental.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
a) Meta-class definition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A meta-class is meant to define the common properties of a set of
|
||||||
|
classes. A meta-class is a "package" of properties. The assembly
|
||||||
|
of properties in a meta-class package is sometimes called a meta-class
|
||||||
|
structure (which isn't always appropriate).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In Python, a meta-class definition would have looked like this:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> metaclass M:
|
||||||
|
attr1 = "Hello" # an attribute of M
|
||||||
|
def method1(self, *args): pass # method1 of M
|
||||||
|
def method2(self, *args): pass # method2 of M
|
||||||
|
>>>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
So far, we defined the structure of the meta-class M. The meta-class
|
||||||
|
M is of type <metaclass>. We cannot check this by asking Python, but
|
||||||
|
if we could, it would have answered:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> M # What is M?
|
||||||
|
<metaclass __main__.M at 2023e4e0>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
b) Meta-class instanciation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Creating an object with the properties defined in the meta-class M is
|
||||||
|
called instanciation of the meta-class M. After an instanciation of M,
|
||||||
|
we obtain a new object, called an class, but now it is called also
|
||||||
|
a meta-instance, which has the properties packaged in the meta-class M.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In Python, instantiating a meta-class would have looked like this:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> A = M() # 'A' is the 1st instance of M
|
||||||
|
>>> A # What is 'A'?
|
||||||
|
<class __main__.A at 2022b9d0>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> B = M() # 'B' is another instance of M
|
||||||
|
>>> B # What is 'B'?
|
||||||
|
<class __main__.B at 2022b9c0>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The metaclass-instances, A and B, are of type <class> and they both
|
||||||
|
have the same properties. Note, that A and B are different objects.
|
||||||
|
(their adresses differ). This is a bit hard to see, but if it was
|
||||||
|
possible to ask Python, it would have answered:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> A == B # Is A the same class as B?
|
||||||
|
0 # No.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Class objects have one more special property, indicating the meta-class
|
||||||
|
they are an instance of. This property is named __metaclass__.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> A.__metaclass__ # What is the meta-class of A?
|
||||||
|
<metaclass __main__.M at 2023e4e0> # A is an instance of M
|
||||||
|
>>> A.__metaclass__ # What is the meta-class of B?
|
||||||
|
<metaclass __main__.M at 2023e4e0> # B is an instance of M
|
||||||
|
>>> A.__metaclass__ == B.__metaclass__ # Is it the same meta-class M?
|
||||||
|
1 # Yes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
c) Meta-class inheritance (meta-class composition and specialization)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Meta-classes can be defined in terms of other existing meta-classes
|
||||||
|
(and only meta-classes!). Thus, we can compose property packages and
|
||||||
|
create new ones. We reuse the property set defined in a meta-class by
|
||||||
|
defining a new meta-class, which "inherits" from the former.
|
||||||
|
In other words, a meta-class N which inherits from the meta-class M,
|
||||||
|
inherits the properties defined in M, or, N inherits the structure of M.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In the same time, at the definition of the new meta-class N, we can
|
||||||
|
enrich the inherited set of properties by adding new ones and/or modify
|
||||||
|
some of the inherited properties.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> metaclass N(M): # N inherits M's properties
|
||||||
|
attr2 = "World" # additional attr2
|
||||||
|
def method2(self, arg1): pass # method2 is redefined
|
||||||
|
def method3(self, *args): pass # additional method3
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> N # What is N?
|
||||||
|
<metaclass __main__.N at 2023e500>
|
||||||
|
>>> N == M # Is N the same meta-class as M?
|
||||||
|
0 # No.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Meta-classes define one special property, indicating whether a
|
||||||
|
meta-class inherits the properties of another meta-class. This property
|
||||||
|
is called __metabases__ and it contains a list (a tuple) of the
|
||||||
|
meta-classes the new meta-class inherits from. The meta-classes from
|
||||||
|
which a meta-class is inheriting the properties are called
|
||||||
|
super-meta-classes (in Python, we call them also -- super meta-bases).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
>>> M.__metabases__ # Does M have any supermetaclasses?
|
||||||
|
() # No.
|
||||||
|
>>> N.__metabases__ # Does N have any supermetaclasses?
|
||||||
|
(<metaclass __main__.M at 2023e360>,) # Yes. It has a supermetaclass.
|
||||||
|
>>> N.__bases__[0] == M # Is it really the meta-class M?
|
||||||
|
1 # Yes, it is.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Triple congratulations on getting this far!
|
||||||
|
Now you know everything about meta-classes and the Real-World!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<unless-wizards-want-meta-classes-be-instances-of-mysterious-objects!>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
--
|
||||||
|
Vladimir MARANGOZOV | Vladimir.Marangozov@inrialpes.fr
|
||||||
|
http://sirac.inrialpes.fr/~marangoz | tel:(+33-4)76615277 fax:76615252
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue