traverseda
/
cpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Issue a more meaningful error if strftime keeps returning a NULL pointer. 

Run the loop up to and including 8k.
This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 1997-02-14 16:35:10 +00:00
parent 0d85be19e2
commit a78bfe1985
1 changed files with 5 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
Modules/timemodule.c
View File

@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ time_strftime(self, args)
/* I hate these functions that presume you know how big the output
* will be ahead of time...
*/
for (i = 1024 ; i < 8192 ; i += 1024) {
for (i = 1024 ; i <= 8192 ; i += 1024) {
outbuf = malloc(i);
if (outbuf == NULL) {
return PyErr_NoMemory();
@ -255,7 +255,9 @@ time_strftime(self, args)
}
free(outbuf);
}
return PyErr_NoMemory();
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,
"bad strftime format or result too big");
return NULL;
}
#endif /* HAVE_STRFTIME */
@ -443,6 +445,7 @@ floatsleep(double secs)
double secs;
#endif /* MPW */
{
/* XXX Should test for MS_WIN32 first! */
#ifdef HAVE_SELECT
struct timeval t;
double frac;