traverseda
/
cpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Made most module references "clickable".

This commit is contained in:
Tim Peters 2004-09-26 21:05:03 +00:00
parent 0041121c25
commit 9463d8761b
1 changed files with 67 additions and 68 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

135
Doc/lib/libdoctest.tex
View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
\modulesynopsis{A framework for verifying interactive Python examples.}
The \module{doctest} module searches for pieces of text that look like
The \refmodule{doctest} module searches for pieces of text that look like
interactive Python sessions, and then executes those sessions to
verify that they work exactly as shown. There are several common ways to
use doctest:
@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
\end{verbatim}
If you run \file{example.py} directly from the command line,
\module{doctest} works its magic:
\refmodule{doctest} works its magic:
\begin{verbatim}
$ python example.py
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ $
\end{verbatim}
There's no output! That's normal, and it means all the examples
worked. Pass \programopt{-v} to the script, and \module{doctest}
worked. Pass \programopt{-v} to the script, and \refmodule{doctest}
prints a detailed log of what it's trying, and prints a summary at the
end:
@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ $
\end{verbatim}
That's all you need to know to start making productive use of
\module{doctest}! Jump in. The following sections provide full
\refmodule{doctest}! Jump in. The following sections provide full
details. Note that there are many examples of doctests in
the standard Python test suite and libraries. Especially useful examples
can be found in the standard test file \file{Lib/test/test_doctest.py}.
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ if __name__ == "__main__":
_test()
\end{verbatim}
\module{doctest} then examines docstrings in module \module{M}.
\refmodule{doctest} then examines docstrings in module \module{M}.
Running the module as a script causes the examples in the docstrings
to get executed and verified:
@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ that started the example.
\subsubsection{What's the Execution Context?\label{doctest-execution-context}}
By default, each time \module{doctest} finds a docstring to test, it
By default, each time \refmodule{doctest} finds a docstring to test, it
uses a \emph{shallow copy} of \module{M}'s globals, so that running tests
doesn't change the module's real globals, and so that one test in
\module{M} can't leave behind crumbs that accidentally allow another test
@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ can be useful.
were added]{2.4}
There's also a way to register new option flag names, although this
isn't useful unless you intend to extend \module{doctest} internals
isn't useful unless you intend to extend \refmodule{doctest} internals
via subclassing:
\begin{funcdesc}{register_optionflag}{name}
@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ via subclassing:
\subsubsection{Warnings\label{doctest-warnings}}
\module{doctest} is serious about requiring exact matches in expected
\refmodule{doctest} is serious about requiring exact matches in expected
output. If even a single character doesn't match, the test fails. This
will probably surprise you a few times, as you learn exactly what Python
does and doesn't guarantee about output. For example, when printing a
@ -977,16 +977,16 @@ to deprecate it, but it's rarely useful:
\subsection{Unittest API\label{doctest-unittest-api}}
As your collection of doctest'ed modules grows, you'll want a way to run
all their doctests systematically. Prior to Python 2.4, \module{doctest}
all their doctests systematically. Prior to Python 2.4, \refmodule{doctest}
had a barely documented \class{Tester} class that supplied a rudimentary
way to combine doctests from multiple modules. \class{Tester} was feeble,
and in practice most serious Python testing frameworks build on the
\module{unittest} module, which supplies many flexible ways to combine
tests from multiple sources. So, in Python 2.4, \module{doctest}'s
\class{Tester} class is deprecated, and \module{doctest} provides two
functions that can be used to create \module{unittest} test suites from
\refmodule{unittest} module, which supplies many flexible ways to combine
tests from multiple sources. So, in Python 2.4, \refmodule{doctest}'s
\class{Tester} class is deprecated, and \refmodule{doctest} provides two
functions that can be used to create \refmodule{unittest} test suites from
modules and text files containing doctests. These test suites can then be
run using \module{unittest} test runners:
run using \refmodule{unittest} test runners:
\begin{verbatim}
import unittest
@ -1000,19 +1000,18 @@ runner = unittest.TextTestRunner()
runner.run(suite)
\end{verbatim}
There are two main functions for creating \class{unittest.TestSuite}
There are two main functions for creating \class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite}
instances from text files and modules with doctests:
\begin{funcdesc}{DocFileSuite}{*paths, **kw}
Convert doctest tests from one or more text files to a
\class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite}.
The returned \class{unittest.TestSuite} is to be run by the unittest
framework and runs the interactive examples in each file. If an
example in any file fails, then the synthesized unit test fails, and
a \exception{failureException} exception is raised showing the
name of the file containing the test and a (sometimes approximate)
line number.
The returned \class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite} is to be run by the
unittest framework and runs the interactive examples in each file. If an
example in any file fails, then the synthesized unit test fails, and a
\exception{failureException} exception is raised showing the name of the
file containing the test and a (sometimes approximate) line number.
Pass one or more paths (as strings) to text files to be examined.
@ -1076,9 +1075,9 @@ instances from text files and modules with doctests:
Convert doctest tests for a module to a
\class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite}.
The returned \class{unittest.TestSuite} is to be run by the unittest
framework and runs each doctest in the module. If any of the doctests
fail, then the synthesized unit test fails, and a
The returned \class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite} is to be run by the
unittest framework and runs each doctest in the module. If any of the
doctests fail, then the synthesized unit test fails, and a
\exception{failureException} exception is raised showing the name of the
file containing the test and a (sometimes approximate) line number.
@ -1111,50 +1110,50 @@ instances from text files and modules with doctests:
\end{funcdesc}
Under the covers, \function{DocTestSuite()} creates a
\class{unittest.TestSuite} out of \class{doctest.DocTestCase} instances,
and \class{DocTestCase} is a subclass of \class{unittest.TestCase}.
\class{DocTestCase} isn't documented here (it's an internal detail), but
studying its code can answer questions about the exact details of
\module{unittest} integration.
\class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite} out of \class{doctest.DocTestCase}
instances, and \class{DocTestCase} is a subclass of
\class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestCase}. \class{DocTestCase} isn't documented
here (it's an internal detail), but studying its code can answer questions
about the exact details of \refmodule{unittest} integration.
Similarly, \function{DocFileSuite()} creates a \class{unittest.TestSuite}
out of \class{doctest.DocFileCase} instances, and \class{DocFileCase}
is a subclass of \class{DocTestCase}.
Similarly, \function{DocFileSuite()} creates a
\class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite} out of \class{doctest.DocFileCase}
instances, and \class{DocFileCase} is a subclass of \class{DocTestCase}.
So both ways of creating a \class{unittest.TestSuite} run instances of
\class{DocTestCase}. This is important for a subtle reason: when you
run \module{doctest} functions yourself, you can control the
\module{doctest} options in use directly, by passing option flags to
\module{doctest} functions. However, if you're writing a \module{unittest}
framework, \module{unittest} ultimately controls when and how tests
get run. The framework author typically wants to control \module{doctest}
reporting options (perhaps, e.g., specified by command line options),
but there's no way to pass options through \module{unittest} to
\module{doctest} test runners.
So both ways of creating a \class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestSuite} run
instances of \class{DocTestCase}. This is important for a subtle reason:
when you run \refmodule{doctest} functions yourself, you can control the
\refmodule{doctest} options in use directly, by passing option flags to
\refmodule{doctest} functions. However, if you're writing a
\refmodule{unittest} framework, \refmodule{unittest} ultimately controls
when and how tests get run. The framework author typically wants to
control \refmodule{doctest} reporting options (perhaps, e.g., specified by
command line options), but there's no way to pass options through
\refmodule{unittest} to \refmodule{doctest} test runners.
For this reason, \module{doctest} also supports a notion of
\module{doctest} reporting flags specific to \module{unittest} support,
via this function:
For this reason, \refmodule{doctest} also supports a notion of
\refmodule{doctest} reporting flags specific to \refmodule{unittest}
support, via this function:
\begin{funcdesc}{set_unittest_reportflags}{flags}
Set the \module{doctest} reporting flags to use.
Set the \refmodule{doctest} reporting flags to use.
Argument \var{flags} or's together option flags. See
section~\ref{doctest-options}. Only "reporting flags" can be used.
This is a module-global setting, and affects all future doctests run
by module \module{unittest}: the \method{runTest()} method of
\class{DocTestCase} looks at the option flags specified for the test
case when the \class{DocTestCase} instance was constructed. If no
reporting flags were specified (which is the typical and expected case),
\module{doctest}'s \module{unittest} reporting flags are or'ed into the
option flags, and the option flags so augmented are passed to the
This is a module-global setting, and affects all future doctests run by
module \refmodule{unittest}: the \method{runTest()} method of
\class{DocTestCase} looks at the option flags specified for the test case
when the \class{DocTestCase} instance was constructed. If no reporting
flags were specified (which is the typical and expected case),
\refmodule{doctest}'s \refmodule{unittest} reporting flags are or'ed into
the option flags, and the option flags so augmented are passed to the
\class{DocTestRunner} instance created to run the doctest. If any
reporting flags were specified when the \class{DocTestCase} instance
was constructed, \module{doctest}'s \module{unittest} reporting flags
reporting flags were specified when the \class{DocTestCase} instance was
constructed, \refmodule{doctest}'s \refmodule{unittest} reporting flags
are ignored.
The value of the \module{unittest} reporting flags in effect before the
The value of the \refmodule{unittest} reporting flags in effect before the
function was called is returned by the function.
\versionadded{2.4}
@ -1587,11 +1586,11 @@ Doctest provides several mechanisms for debugging doctest examples:
failing example, containing information about that example.
This information can be used to perform post-mortem debugging on
the example.
\item The \module{unittest} cases generated by \function{DocTestSuite()}
\item The \refmodule{unittest} cases generated by \function{DocTestSuite()}
support the \method{debug()} method defined by
\class{unittest.TestCase}.
\item You can add a call to \function{pdb.set_trace()} in a doctest
example, and you'll drop into the Python debugger when that
\class{\refmodule{unittest}.TestCase}.
\item You can add a call to \function{\refmodule{pdb}.set_trace()} in a
doctest example, and you'll drop into the Python debugger when that
line is executed. Then you can inspect current values of variables,
and so on. For example, suppose \file{a.py} contains just this
module docstring:
@ -1642,8 +1641,8 @@ Doctest provides several mechanisms for debugging doctest examples:
>>>
\end{verbatim}
\versionchanged[The ability to use \code{pdb.set_trace()} usefully
inside doctests was added]{2.4}
\versionchanged[The ability to use \code{\refmodule{pdb}.set_trace()}
usefully inside doctests was added]{2.4}
\end{itemize}
Functions that convert doctests to Python code, and possibly run
@ -1709,13 +1708,13 @@ the synthesized code under the debugger:
and global execution context.
Optional argument \var{pm} controls whether post-mortem debugging is
used. If \var{pm} has a true value, the script file is run directly,
and the debugger gets involved only if the script terminates via raising
an unhandled exception. If it does, then post-mortem debugging is
invoked, via \code{pdb.post_mortem()}, passing the traceback object
used. If \var{pm} has a true value, the script file is run directly, and
the debugger gets involved only if the script terminates via raising an
unhandled exception. If it does, then post-mortem debugging is invoked,
via \code{\refmodule{pdb}.post_mortem()}, passing the traceback object
from the unhandled exception. If \var{pm} is not specified, or is false,
the script is run under the debugger from the start, via passing an
appropriate \function{execfile()} call to \code{pdb.run()}.
appropriate \function{execfile()} call to \code{\refmodule{pdb}.run()}.
\versionadded{2.3}
@ -1801,7 +1800,7 @@ instances:
\subsection{Soapbox\label{doctest-soapbox}}
As mentioned in the introduction, \module{doctest} has grown to have
As mentioned in the introduction, \refmodule{doctest} has grown to have
three primary uses:
\begin{enumerate}