Update output to reflect additional precision produced by the repr() of
floating point numbers in an interactive example. Added comment to help explain control flow in the example code showing how to check if a number is prime. This closes SF bugs 419434 and 424552.
This commit is contained in:
parent
24e621918b
commit
8b0b8409ae
|
@ -1166,6 +1166,7 @@ which searches for prime numbers:
|
|||
... print n, 'equals', x, '*', n/x
|
||||
... break
|
||||
... else:
|
||||
... # loop fell through without finding a factor
|
||||
... print n, 'is a prime number'
|
||||
...
|
||||
2 is a prime number
|
||||
|
@ -2609,10 +2610,10 @@ reverse quotes (\code{``}). Some examples:
|
|||
|
||||
\begin{verbatim}
|
||||
>>> x = 10 * 3.14
|
||||
>>> y = 200*200
|
||||
>>> y = 200 * 200
|
||||
>>> s = 'The value of x is ' + `x` + ', and y is ' + `y` + '...'
|
||||
>>> print s
|
||||
The value of x is 31.4, and y is 40000...
|
||||
The value of x is 31.400000000000002, and y is 40000...
|
||||
>>> # Reverse quotes work on other types besides numbers:
|
||||
... p = [x, y]
|
||||
>>> ps = repr(p)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue