[3.9] bpo-42381: Allow walrus in set literals and set comprehensions (GH-23332) (GH-23333)

Currently walruses are not allowerd in set literals and set comprehensions:

>>> {y := 4, 4**2, 3**3}
  File "<stdin>", line 1
    {y := 4, 4**2, 3**3}
       ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

but they should be allowed as well per PEP 572.
(cherry picked from commit b0aba1fcdc)

Co-authored-by: Pablo Galindo <Pablogsal@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Pablo Galindo 2020-11-18 23:44:30 +00:00 committed by GitHub
parent 36619e1bc4
commit 87c87b5bd6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
4 changed files with 1682 additions and 1792 deletions

View File

@ -301,7 +301,6 @@ block[asdl_seq*] (memo):
| simple_stmt
| invalid_block
expressions_list[asdl_seq*]: a=','.star_expression+ [','] { a }
star_expressions[expr_ty]:
| a=star_expression b=(',' c=star_expression { c })+ [','] {
_Py_Tuple(CHECK(_PyPegen_seq_insert_in_front(p, a, b)), Load, EXTRA) }
@ -505,9 +504,9 @@ group[expr_ty]:
genexp[expr_ty]:
| '(' a=named_expression ~ b=for_if_clauses ')' { _Py_GeneratorExp(a, b, EXTRA) }
| invalid_comprehension
set[expr_ty]: '{' a=expressions_list '}' { _Py_Set(a, EXTRA) }
set[expr_ty]: '{' a=star_named_expressions '}' { _Py_Set(a, EXTRA) }
setcomp[expr_ty]:
| '{' a=expression ~ b=for_if_clauses '}' { _Py_SetComp(a, b, EXTRA) }
| '{' a=named_expression ~ b=for_if_clauses '}' { _Py_SetComp(a, b, EXTRA) }
| invalid_comprehension
dict[expr_ty]:
| '{' a=[double_starred_kvpairs] '}' {

View File

@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ class NamedExpressionInvalidTest(unittest.TestCase):
"assignment expression within a comprehension cannot be used in a class body"):
exec(code, {}, {})
def test_named_expression_invalid_rebinding_comprehension_iteration_variable(self):
def test_named_expression_invalid_rebinding_list_comprehension_iteration_variable(self):
cases = [
("Local reuse", 'i', "[i := 0 for i in range(5)]"),
("Nested reuse", 'j', "[[(j := 0) for i in range(5)] for j in range(5)]"),
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ class NamedExpressionInvalidTest(unittest.TestCase):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(code, {}, {})
def test_named_expression_invalid_rebinding_comprehension_inner_loop(self):
def test_named_expression_invalid_rebinding_list_comprehension_inner_loop(self):
cases = [
("Inner reuse", 'j', "[i for i in range(5) if (j := 0) for j in range(5)]"),
("Inner unpacking reuse", 'j', "[i for i in range(5) if (j := 0) for j, k in [(0, 1)]]"),
@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ class NamedExpressionInvalidTest(unittest.TestCase):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(f"lambda: {code}", {}) # Function scope
def test_named_expression_invalid_comprehension_iterable_expression(self):
def test_named_expression_invalid_list_comprehension_iterable_expression(self):
cases = [
("Top level", "[i for i in (i := range(5))]"),
("Inside tuple", "[i for i in (2, 3, i := range(5))]"),
@ -167,6 +167,60 @@ class NamedExpressionInvalidTest(unittest.TestCase):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(f"lambda: {code}", {}) # Function scope
def test_named_expression_invalid_rebinding_set_comprehension_iteration_variable(self):
cases = [
("Local reuse", 'i', "{i := 0 for i in range(5)}"),
("Nested reuse", 'j', "{{(j := 0) for i in range(5)} for j in range(5)}"),
("Reuse inner loop target", 'j', "{(j := 0) for i in range(5) for j in range(5)}"),
("Unpacking reuse", 'i', "{i := 0 for i, j in {(0, 1)}}"),
("Reuse in loop condition", 'i', "{i+1 for i in range(5) if (i := 0)}"),
("Unreachable reuse", 'i', "{False or (i:=0) for i in range(5)}"),
("Unreachable nested reuse", 'i',
"{(i, j) for i in range(5) for j in range(5) if True or (i:=10)}"),
]
for case, target, code in cases:
msg = f"assignment expression cannot rebind comprehension iteration variable '{target}'"
with self.subTest(case=case):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(code, {}, {})
def test_named_expression_invalid_rebinding_set_comprehension_inner_loop(self):
cases = [
("Inner reuse", 'j', "{i for i in range(5) if (j := 0) for j in range(5)}"),
("Inner unpacking reuse", 'j', "{i for i in range(5) if (j := 0) for j, k in {(0, 1)}}"),
]
for case, target, code in cases:
msg = f"comprehension inner loop cannot rebind assignment expression target '{target}'"
with self.subTest(case=case):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(code, {}) # Module scope
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(code, {}, {}) # Class scope
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(f"lambda: {code}", {}) # Function scope
def test_named_expression_invalid_set_comprehension_iterable_expression(self):
cases = [
("Top level", "{i for i in (i := range(5))}"),
("Inside tuple", "{i for i in (2, 3, i := range(5))}"),
("Inside list", "{i for i in {2, 3, i := range(5)}}"),
("Different name", "{i for i in (j := range(5))}"),
("Lambda expression", "{i for i in (lambda:(j := range(5)))()}"),
("Inner loop", "{i for i in range(5) for j in (i := range(5))}"),
("Nested comprehension", "{i for i in {j for j in (k := range(5))}}"),
("Nested comprehension condition", "{i for i in {j for j in range(5) if (j := True)}}"),
("Nested comprehension body", "{i for i in {(j := True) for j in range(5)}}"),
]
msg = "assignment expression cannot be used in a comprehension iterable expression"
for case, code in cases:
with self.subTest(case=case):
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(code, {}) # Module scope
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(code, {}, {}) # Class scope
with self.assertRaisesRegex(SyntaxError, msg):
exec(f"lambda: {code}", {}) # Function scope
class NamedExpressionAssignmentTest(unittest.TestCase):

View File

@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
Allow assignment expressions in set literals and set comprehensions as per
PEP 572. Patch by Pablo Galindo.

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff