From 87b0551931d7c3373210c9d4c33b2b72732c645c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Georg Brandl Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 08:00:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] #2299: typos in newtypes.rst. --- Doc/extending/newtypes.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/extending/newtypes.rst b/Doc/extending/newtypes.rst index f9f8d43d511..ba39951adcc 100644 --- a/Doc/extending/newtypes.rst +++ b/Doc/extending/newtypes.rst @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ reference counts. When don't we have to do this? * when decrementing a reference count in a :attr:`tp_dealloc` handler when garbage-collections is not supported [#]_ -We want to want to expose our instance variables as attributes. There are a +We want to expose our instance variables as attributes. There are a number of ways to do that. The simplest way is to define member definitions:: static PyMemberDef Noddy_members[] = { @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ and register it in the :attr:`tp_getset` slot:: Noddy_getseters, /* tp_getset */ -to register out attribute getters and setters. +to register our attribute getters and setters. The last item in a :ctype:`PyGetSetDef` structure is the closure mentioned above. In this case, we aren't using the closure, so we just pass *NULL*. @@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@ might be something like the following:: less careful about decrementing their reference counts, however, we accept instances of string subclasses. Even though deallocating normal strings won't call back into our objects, we can't guarantee that deallocating an instance of - a string subclass won't. call back into out objects. + a string subclass won't call back into our objects. .. [#] Even in the third version, we aren't guaranteed to avoid cycles. Instances of string subclasses are allowed and string subclasses could allow cycles even if