At CNRI's request, I'm changing the status of 1.6.1 from
not-GPL-compatible to GPL-compatible, with a footnote explaining that RMS disagrees. I'm not going to discuss this further -- both sides (CNRI and RMS) will argue their POV till they're blue in the face.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5159f1da7d
commit
7df772b237
7
LICENSE
7
LICENSE
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ the various releases.
|
||||||
1.3 thru 1.5.2 1.2 1995-1999 CNRI yes
|
1.3 thru 1.5.2 1.2 1995-1999 CNRI yes
|
||||||
1.6 1.5.2 2000 CNRI no
|
1.6 1.5.2 2000 CNRI no
|
||||||
2.0 1.6 2000 BeOpen.com no
|
2.0 1.6 2000 BeOpen.com no
|
||||||
1.6.1 1.6 2001 CNRI no
|
1.6.1 1.6 2001 CNRI yes (2)
|
||||||
2.1 2.0+1.6.1 2001 PSF no
|
2.1 2.0+1.6.1 2001 PSF no
|
||||||
2.0.1 2.0+1.6.1 2001 PSF yes
|
2.0.1 2.0+1.6.1 2001 PSF yes
|
||||||
2.1.1 2.1+2.0.1 2001 PSF yes
|
2.1.1 2.1+2.0.1 2001 PSF yes
|
||||||
|
@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ Footnotes:
|
||||||
GPL-compatible licenses make it possible to combine Python with
|
GPL-compatible licenses make it possible to combine Python with
|
||||||
other software that is released under the GPL; the others don't.
|
other software that is released under the GPL; the others don't.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(2) According to Richard Stallman, 1.6.1 is not GPL-compatible,
|
||||||
|
because its license has a choice of law clause. According to
|
||||||
|
CNRI, however, Stallman's lawyer has told CNRI's lawyer that 1.6.1
|
||||||
|
is "not incompatible" with the GPL.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Thanks to the many outside volunteers who have worked under Guido's
|
Thanks to the many outside volunteers who have worked under Guido's
|
||||||
direction to make these releases possible.
|
direction to make these releases possible.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue