At CNRI's request, I'm changing the status of 1.6.1 from
not-GPL-compatible to GPL-compatible, with a footnote explaining that RMS disagrees. I'm not going to discuss this further -- both sides (CNRI and RMS) will argue their POV till they're blue in the face.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5159f1da7d
commit
7df772b237
7
LICENSE
7
LICENSE
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ the various releases.
|
|||
1.3 thru 1.5.2 1.2 1995-1999 CNRI yes
|
||||
1.6 1.5.2 2000 CNRI no
|
||||
2.0 1.6 2000 BeOpen.com no
|
||||
1.6.1 1.6 2001 CNRI no
|
||||
1.6.1 1.6 2001 CNRI yes (2)
|
||||
2.1 2.0+1.6.1 2001 PSF no
|
||||
2.0.1 2.0+1.6.1 2001 PSF yes
|
||||
2.1.1 2.1+2.0.1 2001 PSF yes
|
||||
|
@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ Footnotes:
|
|||
GPL-compatible licenses make it possible to combine Python with
|
||||
other software that is released under the GPL; the others don't.
|
||||
|
||||
(2) According to Richard Stallman, 1.6.1 is not GPL-compatible,
|
||||
because its license has a choice of law clause. According to
|
||||
CNRI, however, Stallman's lawyer has told CNRI's lawyer that 1.6.1
|
||||
is "not incompatible" with the GPL.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks to the many outside volunteers who have worked under Guido's
|
||||
direction to make these releases possible.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue