Paul Rubin reminds me that of course a class's constructor /could/ get

called, if the pickler found a __getinitargs__() method.
This commit is contained in:
Barry Warsaw 2001-11-18 16:24:01 +00:00
parent f376ef0996
commit 69ab5836ae
1 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -604,10 +604,12 @@ evil things like call \code{os.unlink()} with an arbitrary file name.
See section~\ref{pickle-protocol} for more details.
For safely unpickling class instances, you need to control exactly
which classes will get created. The issue here is usually not that a
class's constructor will get called --- it won't by the unpickler ---
but that the class's destructor (i.e. its \method{__del__()} method)
might get called when the object is garbage collected. The way to
which classes will get created. Be aware that a class's constructor
could be called (if the pickler found a \method{__getinitargs__()}
method) and the the class's destructor (i.e. its \method{__del__()} method)
might get called when the object is garbage collected. Depending on
the class, it isn't very heard to trick either method into doing bad
things, such as removing a file. The way to
control the classes that are safe to instantiate differs in
\module{pickle} and \module{cPickle}\footnote{A word of caution: the
mechanisms described here use internal attributes and methods, which