Fix three nits found by Coverity, adding null checks and comments.
This commit is contained in:
parent
480f1bb67b
commit
692cdbc5d6
|
@ -3186,6 +3186,10 @@ PyType_Ready(PyTypeObject *type)
|
|||
Py_INCREF(base);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now the only way base can still be NULL is if type is
|
||||
* &PyBaseObject_Type.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize the base class */
|
||||
if (base && base->tp_dict == NULL) {
|
||||
if (PyType_Ready(base) < 0)
|
||||
|
@ -3195,7 +3199,11 @@ PyType_Ready(PyTypeObject *type)
|
|||
/* Initialize ob_type if NULL. This means extensions that want to be
|
||||
compilable separately on Windows can call PyType_Ready() instead of
|
||||
initializing the ob_type field of their type objects. */
|
||||
if (type->ob_type == NULL)
|
||||
/* The test for base != NULL is really unnecessary, since base is only
|
||||
NULL when type is &PyBaseObject_Type, and we know its ob_type is
|
||||
not NULL (it's initialized to &PyType_Type). But coverity doesn't
|
||||
know that. */
|
||||
if (type->ob_type == NULL && base != NULL)
|
||||
type->ob_type = base->ob_type;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize tp_bases */
|
||||
|
@ -3750,7 +3758,9 @@ hackcheck(PyObject *self, setattrofunc func, char *what)
|
|||
PyTypeObject *type = self->ob_type;
|
||||
while (type && type->tp_flags & Py_TPFLAGS_HEAPTYPE)
|
||||
type = type->tp_base;
|
||||
if (type->tp_setattro != func) {
|
||||
/* If type is NULL now, this is a really weird type.
|
||||
In the same of backwards compatibility (?), just shut up. */
|
||||
if (type && type->tp_setattro != func) {
|
||||
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
|
||||
"can't apply this %s to %s object",
|
||||
what,
|
||||
|
@ -3965,7 +3975,9 @@ tp_new_wrapper(PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
|
|||
staticbase = subtype;
|
||||
while (staticbase && (staticbase->tp_flags & Py_TPFLAGS_HEAPTYPE))
|
||||
staticbase = staticbase->tp_base;
|
||||
if (staticbase->tp_new != type->tp_new) {
|
||||
/* If staticbase is NULL now, it is a really weird type.
|
||||
In the same of backwards compatibility (?), just shut up. */
|
||||
if (staticbase && staticbase->tp_new != type->tp_new) {
|
||||
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
|
||||
"%s.__new__(%s) is not safe, use %s.__new__()",
|
||||
type->tp_name,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue