From f5d4523844cad49074a562bad4a7095ed955640d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Terry Jan Reedy Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:44:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Closes issue #24405: mark set display as code. --- Doc/reference/expressions.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doc/reference/expressions.rst b/Doc/reference/expressions.rst index 2d19660ae7a..dd3cb9e6ba3 100644 --- a/Doc/reference/expressions.rst +++ b/Doc/reference/expressions.rst @@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@ Comparison of objects of the same type depends on the type: * Sets and frozensets define comparison operators to mean subset and superset tests. Those relations do not define total orderings (the two sets ``{1,2}`` - and {2,3} are not equal, nor subsets of one another, nor supersets of one + and ``{2,3}`` are not equal, nor subsets of one another, nor supersets of one another). Accordingly, sets are not appropriate arguments for functions which depend on total ordering. For example, :func:`min`, :func:`max`, and :func:`sorted` produce undefined results given a list of sets as inputs.