From 5bd7fccef916b4c5c99faee4d4e4ad1e967b806b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fred Drake Date: Fri, 3 Apr 1998 05:31:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Minor nits. Index entry. --- Doc/lib/libparser.tex | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- Doc/libparser.tex | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/lib/libparser.tex b/Doc/lib/libparser.tex index ec1bae5761c..56e1931e224 100644 --- a/Doc/lib/libparser.tex +++ b/Doc/lib/libparser.tex @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ to parse and modify an arbitrary Python code fragment as a string because parsing is performed in a manner identical to the code forming the application. It is also faster. +The \module{parser} module was written and documented by Fred +L. Drake, Jr. (\email{fdrake@acm.org}).% +\index{Drake, Fred L., Jr.} + There are a few things to note about this module which are important to making use of the data structures created. This is not a tutorial on editing the parse trees for Python code, but some examples of using @@ -89,8 +93,6 @@ to convert AST objects to other representations such as parse trees and compiled code objects, but there are also functions which serve to query the type of parse tree represented by an AST object. -\setindexsubitem{(in module parser)} - \subsection{Creating AST Objects} \label{Creating ASTs} @@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ converted to parse trees represented as list- or tuple- trees, or may be compiled into executable code objects. Parse trees may be extracted with or without line numbering information. -\begin{funcdesc}{ast2list}{ast\optional{, line_info\code{ = 0}}} +\begin{funcdesc}{ast2list}{ast\optional{, line_info}} This function accepts an AST object from the caller in \code{\var{ast}} and returns a Python list representing the equivelent parse tree. The resulting list representation can be used @@ -172,7 +174,7 @@ the line on which the token \emph{ends}. This information is omitted if the flag is false or omitted. \end{funcdesc} -\begin{funcdesc}{ast2tuple}{ast\optional{, line_info\code{ = 0}}} +\begin{funcdesc}{ast2tuple}{ast\optional{, line_info}} This function accepts an AST object from the caller in \code{\var{ast}} and returns a Python tuple representing the equivelent parse tree. Other than returning a tuple instead of a @@ -210,7 +212,7 @@ inspection of the parse tree. \label{Querying ASTs} Two functions are provided which allow an application to determine if -an AST was create as an expression or a suite. Neither of these +an AST was created as an expression or a suite. Neither of these functions can be used to determine if an AST was created from source code via \function{expr()} or \function{suite()} or from a parse tree via \function{sequence2ast()}. @@ -304,7 +306,7 @@ intermediate data structure is equivelent to the code >>> eval(code) 10 \end{verbatim} -% + The equivelent operation using the \module{parser} module is somewhat longer, and allows the intermediate internal parse tree to be retained as an AST object: @@ -317,7 +319,7 @@ as an AST object: >>> eval(code) 10 \end{verbatim} -% + An application which needs both AST and code objects can package this code into readily available functions: @@ -334,7 +336,7 @@ def load_expression(source_string): code = parser.compileast(ast) return ast, code \end{verbatim} -% + \subsubsection{Information Discovery} Some applications benefit from direct access to the parse tree. The @@ -380,7 +382,7 @@ a module consisting of a docstring and nothing else. (See file """Some documentation. """ \end{verbatim} -% + Using the interpreter to take a look at the parse tree, we find a bewildering mass of numbers and parentheses, with the documentation buried deep in nested tuples. @@ -414,7 +416,7 @@ buried deep in nested tuples. (4, ''), (0, '')) \end{verbatim} -% + The numbers at the first element of each node in the tree are the node types; they map directly to terminal and non-terminal symbols in the grammar. Unfortunately, they are represented as integers in the @@ -472,7 +474,7 @@ def match(pattern, data, vars=None): break return same, vars \end{verbatim} -% + Using this simple representation for syntactic variables and the symbolic node types, the pattern for the candidate docstring subtrees becomes fairly readable. (See file \file{example.py}.) @@ -505,7 +507,7 @@ DOCSTRING_STMT_PATTERN = ( (token.NEWLINE, '') )) \end{verbatim} -% + Using the \function{match()} function with this pattern, extracting the module docstring from the parse tree created previously is easy: @@ -516,7 +518,7 @@ module docstring from the parse tree created previously is easy: >>> vars {'docstring': '"""Some documentation.\012"""'} \end{verbatim} -% + Once specific data can be extracted from a location where it is expected, the question of where information can be expected needs to be answered. When dealing with docstrings, the answer is @@ -609,7 +611,7 @@ class SuiteInfoBase: name = cstmt[2][1] self._class_info[name] = ClassInfo(cstmt) \end{verbatim} -% + After initializing some internal state, the constructor calls the \method{_extract_info()} method. This method performs the bulk of the information extraction which takes place in the entire example. The @@ -625,7 +627,7 @@ block, as in \begin{verbatim} def square(x): "Square an argument."; return x ** 2 \end{verbatim} -% + while the long form uses an indented block and allows nested definitions: @@ -636,7 +638,7 @@ def make_power(exp): return x ** y return raiser \end{verbatim} -% + When the short form is used, the code block may contain a docstring as the first, and possibly only, \constant{small_stmt} element. The extraction of such a docstring is slightly different and requires only @@ -681,7 +683,7 @@ def get_docs(fileName): tup = parser.ast2tuple(ast) return ModuleInfo(tup, basename) \end{verbatim} -% + This provides an easy-to-use interface to the documentation of a module. If information is required which is not extracted by the code of this example, the code may be extended at clearly defined points to @@ -689,11 +691,11 @@ provide additional capabilities. \begin{seealso} -\seemodule{symbol}{ - useful constants representing internal nodes of the parse tree} +\seemodule{symbol} + {useful constants representing internal nodes of the parse tree} -\seemodule{token}{ - useful constants representing leaf nodes of the parse tree and - functions for testing node values} +\seemodule{token} + {useful constants representing leaf nodes of the parse tree and + functions for testing node values} \end{seealso} diff --git a/Doc/libparser.tex b/Doc/libparser.tex index ec1bae5761c..56e1931e224 100644 --- a/Doc/libparser.tex +++ b/Doc/libparser.tex @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@ to parse and modify an arbitrary Python code fragment as a string because parsing is performed in a manner identical to the code forming the application. It is also faster. +The \module{parser} module was written and documented by Fred +L. Drake, Jr. (\email{fdrake@acm.org}).% +\index{Drake, Fred L., Jr.} + There are a few things to note about this module which are important to making use of the data structures created. This is not a tutorial on editing the parse trees for Python code, but some examples of using @@ -89,8 +93,6 @@ to convert AST objects to other representations such as parse trees and compiled code objects, but there are also functions which serve to query the type of parse tree represented by an AST object. -\setindexsubitem{(in module parser)} - \subsection{Creating AST Objects} \label{Creating ASTs} @@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ converted to parse trees represented as list- or tuple- trees, or may be compiled into executable code objects. Parse trees may be extracted with or without line numbering information. -\begin{funcdesc}{ast2list}{ast\optional{, line_info\code{ = 0}}} +\begin{funcdesc}{ast2list}{ast\optional{, line_info}} This function accepts an AST object from the caller in \code{\var{ast}} and returns a Python list representing the equivelent parse tree. The resulting list representation can be used @@ -172,7 +174,7 @@ the line on which the token \emph{ends}. This information is omitted if the flag is false or omitted. \end{funcdesc} -\begin{funcdesc}{ast2tuple}{ast\optional{, line_info\code{ = 0}}} +\begin{funcdesc}{ast2tuple}{ast\optional{, line_info}} This function accepts an AST object from the caller in \code{\var{ast}} and returns a Python tuple representing the equivelent parse tree. Other than returning a tuple instead of a @@ -210,7 +212,7 @@ inspection of the parse tree. \label{Querying ASTs} Two functions are provided which allow an application to determine if -an AST was create as an expression or a suite. Neither of these +an AST was created as an expression or a suite. Neither of these functions can be used to determine if an AST was created from source code via \function{expr()} or \function{suite()} or from a parse tree via \function{sequence2ast()}. @@ -304,7 +306,7 @@ intermediate data structure is equivelent to the code >>> eval(code) 10 \end{verbatim} -% + The equivelent operation using the \module{parser} module is somewhat longer, and allows the intermediate internal parse tree to be retained as an AST object: @@ -317,7 +319,7 @@ as an AST object: >>> eval(code) 10 \end{verbatim} -% + An application which needs both AST and code objects can package this code into readily available functions: @@ -334,7 +336,7 @@ def load_expression(source_string): code = parser.compileast(ast) return ast, code \end{verbatim} -% + \subsubsection{Information Discovery} Some applications benefit from direct access to the parse tree. The @@ -380,7 +382,7 @@ a module consisting of a docstring and nothing else. (See file """Some documentation. """ \end{verbatim} -% + Using the interpreter to take a look at the parse tree, we find a bewildering mass of numbers and parentheses, with the documentation buried deep in nested tuples. @@ -414,7 +416,7 @@ buried deep in nested tuples. (4, ''), (0, '')) \end{verbatim} -% + The numbers at the first element of each node in the tree are the node types; they map directly to terminal and non-terminal symbols in the grammar. Unfortunately, they are represented as integers in the @@ -472,7 +474,7 @@ def match(pattern, data, vars=None): break return same, vars \end{verbatim} -% + Using this simple representation for syntactic variables and the symbolic node types, the pattern for the candidate docstring subtrees becomes fairly readable. (See file \file{example.py}.) @@ -505,7 +507,7 @@ DOCSTRING_STMT_PATTERN = ( (token.NEWLINE, '') )) \end{verbatim} -% + Using the \function{match()} function with this pattern, extracting the module docstring from the parse tree created previously is easy: @@ -516,7 +518,7 @@ module docstring from the parse tree created previously is easy: >>> vars {'docstring': '"""Some documentation.\012"""'} \end{verbatim} -% + Once specific data can be extracted from a location where it is expected, the question of where information can be expected needs to be answered. When dealing with docstrings, the answer is @@ -609,7 +611,7 @@ class SuiteInfoBase: name = cstmt[2][1] self._class_info[name] = ClassInfo(cstmt) \end{verbatim} -% + After initializing some internal state, the constructor calls the \method{_extract_info()} method. This method performs the bulk of the information extraction which takes place in the entire example. The @@ -625,7 +627,7 @@ block, as in \begin{verbatim} def square(x): "Square an argument."; return x ** 2 \end{verbatim} -% + while the long form uses an indented block and allows nested definitions: @@ -636,7 +638,7 @@ def make_power(exp): return x ** y return raiser \end{verbatim} -% + When the short form is used, the code block may contain a docstring as the first, and possibly only, \constant{small_stmt} element. The extraction of such a docstring is slightly different and requires only @@ -681,7 +683,7 @@ def get_docs(fileName): tup = parser.ast2tuple(ast) return ModuleInfo(tup, basename) \end{verbatim} -% + This provides an easy-to-use interface to the documentation of a module. If information is required which is not extracted by the code of this example, the code may be extended at clearly defined points to @@ -689,11 +691,11 @@ provide additional capabilities. \begin{seealso} -\seemodule{symbol}{ - useful constants representing internal nodes of the parse tree} +\seemodule{symbol} + {useful constants representing internal nodes of the parse tree} -\seemodule{token}{ - useful constants representing leaf nodes of the parse tree and - functions for testing node values} +\seemodule{token} + {useful constants representing leaf nodes of the parse tree and + functions for testing node values} \end{seealso}