added list of restrictions

This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 1995-02-16 16:29:01 +00:00
parent bcc958259a
commit 5680b95b15
2 changed files with 36 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -30,9 +30,26 @@ list = d.keys() # a list of all existing keys (slow!)
d.close() # close it
\end{verbatim}
Restrictions:
\begin{itemize}
\item
The choice of which database package will be used (e.g. dbm or gdbm)
depends on which interface is available. Therefore it isn't safe to
open the database directly using dbm. The database is also
(unfortunately) subject to the limitations of dbm, if it is used ---
this means that (the pickled representation of) the objects stored in
the database should be fairly small, and in rare cases key collisions
may cause the database to refuse updates.
\item
Dependent on the implementation, closing a persistent dictionary may
or may not be necessary to flush changes to disk.
Note: \code{shelve} does not support {\em concurrent} access to
\item
The \code{shelve} module does not support {\em concurrent} access to
shelved objects. Two programs should not try to simultaneously access
the same shelf.
\end{itemize}

View File

@ -30,9 +30,26 @@ list = d.keys() # a list of all existing keys (slow!)
d.close() # close it
\end{verbatim}
Restrictions:
\begin{itemize}
\item
The choice of which database package will be used (e.g. dbm or gdbm)
depends on which interface is available. Therefore it isn't safe to
open the database directly using dbm. The database is also
(unfortunately) subject to the limitations of dbm, if it is used ---
this means that (the pickled representation of) the objects stored in
the database should be fairly small, and in rare cases key collisions
may cause the database to refuse updates.
\item
Dependent on the implementation, closing a persistent dictionary may
or may not be necessary to flush changes to disk.
Note: \code{shelve} does not support {\em concurrent} access to
\item
The \code{shelve} module does not support {\em concurrent} access to
shelved objects. Two programs should not try to simultaneously access
the same shelf.
\end{itemize}