From 4da2fa5517e2bc844457804b48175e6838cae762 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Georg Brandl Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:59:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add test for #3684. --- Lib/test/test_traceback.py | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/Lib/test/test_traceback.py b/Lib/test/test_traceback.py index 5cd08eeff3d..1140a942b9d 100644 --- a/Lib/test/test_traceback.py +++ b/Lib/test/test_traceback.py @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ class TracebackCases(unittest.TestCase): def syntax_error_with_caret(self): compile("def fact(x):\n\treturn x!\n", "?", "exec") + def syntax_error_with_caret_2(self): + compile("1 +\n", "?", "exec") + def syntax_error_without_caret(self): # XXX why doesn't compile raise the same traceback? import test.badsyntax_nocaret @@ -39,6 +42,12 @@ class TracebackCases(unittest.TestCase): self.assert_("^" in err[2]) # third line has caret self.assert_(err[1].find("!") == err[2].find("^")) # in the right place + err = self.get_exception_format(self.syntax_error_with_caret_2, + SyntaxError) + self.assert_("^" in err[2]) # third line has caret + self.assert_(err[2].count('\n') == 1) # and no additional newline + self.assert_(err[1].find("+") == err[2].find("^")) # in the right place + def test_nocaret(self): if is_jython: # jython adds a caret in this case (why shouldn't it?)