SF bug 839548: Bug in type's GC handling causes segfaults.

Also SF patch 843455.

This is a critical bugfix.
I'll backport to 2.3 maint, but not beyond that.  The bugs this fixes
have been there since weakrefs were introduced.

Include/weakrefobject.h

@@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) PyWeakref_GetObject(PyObject *ref);
 
 PyAPI_FUNC(long) _PyWeakref_GetWeakrefCount(PyWeakReference *head);
 
+PyAPI_FUNC(void) _PyWeakref_ClearRef(PyWeakReference *self);
+
 #define PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT(ref) (((PyWeakReference *)(ref))->wr_object)
 
 

Lib/test/test_weakref.py

@@ -337,6 +337,211 @@ class ReferencesTestCase(TestBase):
         # deallocation of c2.
         del c2
 
+    def test_callback_in_cycle_1(self):
+        import gc
+
+        class J(object):
+            pass
+
+        class II(object):
+            def acallback(self, ignore):
+                self.J
+
+        I = II()
+        I.J = J
+        I.wr = weakref.ref(J, I.acallback)
+
+        # Now J and II are each in a self-cycle (as all new-style class
+        # objects are, since their __mro__ points back to them).  I holds
+        # both a weak reference (I.wr) and a strong reference (I.J) to class
+        # J.  I is also in a cycle (I.wr points to a weakref that references
+        # I.acallback).  When we del these three, they all become trash, but
+        # the cycles prevent any of them from getting cleaned up immediately.
+        # Instead they have to wait for cyclic gc to deduce that they're
+        # trash.
+        #
+        # gc used to call tp_clear on all of them, and the order in which
+        # it does that is pretty accidental.  The exact order in which we
+        # built up these things manages to provoke gc into running tp_clear
+        # in just the right order (I last).  Calling tp_clear on II leaves
+        # behind an insane class object (its __mro__ becomes NULL).  Calling
+        # tp_clear on J breaks its self-cycle, but J doesn't get deleted
+        # just then because of the strong reference from I.J.  Calling
+        # tp_clear on I starts to clear I's __dict__, and just happens to
+        # clear I.J first -- I.wr is still intact.  That removes the last
+        # reference to J, which triggers the weakref callback.  The callback
+        # tries to do "self.J", and instances of new-style classes look up
+        # attributes ("J") in the class dict first.  The class (II) wants to
+        # search II.__mro__, but that's NULL.   The result was a segfault in
+        # a release build, and an assert failure in a debug build.
+        del I, J, II
+        gc.collect()
+
+    def test_callback_in_cycle_2(self):
+        import gc
+
+        # This is just like test_callback_in_cycle_1, except that II is an
+        # old-style class.  The symptom is different then:  an instance of an
+        # old-style class looks in its own __dict__ first.  'J' happens to
+        # get cleared from I.__dict__ before 'wr', and 'J' was never in II's
+        # __dict__, so the attribute isn't found.  The difference is that
+        # the old-style II doesn't have a NULL __mro__ (it doesn't have any
+        # __mro__), so no segfault occurs.  Instead it got:
+        #    test_callback_in_cycle_2 (__main__.ReferencesTestCase) ...
+        #    Exception exceptions.AttributeError:
+        #   "II instance has no attribute 'J'" in <bound method II.acallback
+        #       of <?.II instance at 0x00B9B4B8>> ignored
+
+        class J(object):
+            pass
+
+        class II:
+            def acallback(self, ignore):
+                self.J
+
+        I = II()
+        I.J = J
+        I.wr = weakref.ref(J, I.acallback)
+
+        del I, J, II
+        gc.collect()
+
+    def test_callback_in_cycle_3(self):
+        import gc
+
+        # This one broke the first patch that fixed the last two.  In this
+        # case, the objects reachable from the callback aren't also reachable
+        # from the object (c1) *triggering* the callback:  you can get to
+        # c1 from c2, but not vice-versa.  The result was that c2's __dict__
+        # got tp_clear'ed by the time the c2.cb callback got invoked.
+
+        class C:
+            def cb(self, ignore):
+                self.me
+                self.c1
+                self.wr
+
+        c1, c2 = C(), C()
+
+        c2.me = c2
+        c2.c1 = c1
+        c2.wr = weakref.ref(c1, c2.cb)
+
+        del c1, c2
+        gc.collect()
+
+    def test_callback_in_cycle_4(self):
+        import gc
+
+        # Like test_callback_in_cycle_3, except c2 and c1 have different
+        # classes.  c2's class (C) isn't reachable from c1 then, so protecting
+        # objects reachable from the dying object (c1) isn't enough to stop
+        # c2's class (C) from getting tp_clear'ed before c2.cb is invoked.
+        # The result was a segfault (C.__mro__ was NULL when the callback
+        # tried to look up self.me).
+
+        class C(object):
+            def cb(self, ignore):
+                self.me
+                self.c1
+                self.wr
+
+        class D:
+            pass
+
+        c1, c2 = D(), C()
+
+        c2.me = c2
+        c2.c1 = c1
+        c2.wr = weakref.ref(c1, c2.cb)
+
+        del c1, c2, C, D
+        gc.collect()
+
+    def test_callback_in_cycle_resurrection(self):
+        import gc
+
+        # Do something nasty in a weakref callback:  resurrect objects
+        # from dead cycles.  For this to be attempted, the weakref and
+        # its callback must also be part of the cyclic trash (else the
+        # objects reachable via the callback couldn't be in cyclic trash
+        # to begin with -- the callback would act like an external root).
+        # But gc clears trash weakrefs with callbacks early now, which
+        # disables the callbacks, so the callbacks shouldn't get called
+        # at all (and so nothing actually gets resurrected).
+
+        alist = []
+        class C(object):
+            def __init__(self, value):
+                self.attribute = value
+
+            def acallback(self, ignore):
+                alist.append(self.c)
+
+        c1, c2 = C(1), C(2)
+        c1.c = c2
+        c2.c = c1
+        c1.wr = weakref.ref(c2, c1.acallback)
+        c2.wr = weakref.ref(c1, c2.acallback)
+
+        def C_went_away(ignore):
+            alist.append("C went away")
+        wr = weakref.ref(C, C_went_away)
+
+        del c1, c2, C   # make them all trash
+        self.assertEqual(alist, [])  # del isn't enough to reclaim anything
+
+        gc.collect()
+        # c1.wr and c2.wr were part of the cyclic trash, so should have
+        # been cleared without their callbacks executing.  OTOH, the weakref
+        # to C is bound to a function local (wr), and wasn't trash, so that
+        # callback should have been invoked when C went away.
+        self.assertEqual(alist, ["C went away"])
+        # The remaining weakref should be dead now (its callback ran).
+        self.assertEqual(wr(), None)
+
+        del alist[:]
+        gc.collect()
+        self.assertEqual(alist, [])
+
+    def test_callbacks_on_callback(self):
+        import gc
+
+        # Set up weakref callbacks *on* weakref callbacks.
+        alist = []
+        def safe_callback(ignore):
+            alist.append("safe_callback called")
+
+        class C(object):
+            def cb(self, ignore):
+                alist.append("cb called")
+
+        c, d = C(), C()
+        c.other = d
+        d.other = c
+        callback = c.cb
+        c.wr = weakref.ref(d, callback)     # this won't trigger
+        d.wr = weakref.ref(callback, d.cb)  # ditto
+        external_wr = weakref.ref(callback, safe_callback)  # but this will
+        self.assert_(external_wr() is callback)
+
+        # The weakrefs attached to c and d should get cleared, so that
+        # C.cb is never called.  But external_wr isn't part of the cyclic
+        # trash, and no cyclic trash is reachable from it, so safe_callback
+        # should get invoked when the bound method object callback (c.cb)
+        # -- which is itself a callback, and also part of the cyclic trash --
+        # gets reclaimed at the end of gc.
+
+        del callback, c, d, C
+        self.assertEqual(alist, [])  # del isn't enough to clean up cycles
+        gc.collect()
+        self.assertEqual(alist, ["safe_callback called"])
+        self.assertEqual(external_wr(), None)
+
+        del alist[:]
+        gc.collect()
+        self.assertEqual(alist, [])
+
 class Object:
     def __init__(self, arg):
         self.arg = arg

Misc/NEWS

@@ -12,9 +12,20 @@ What's New in Python 2.4 alpha 1?
 Core and builtins
 -----------------
 
-- Compiler flags set in PYTHONSTARTUP are now active in __main__.
+- Critical bugfix, for SF bug 839548:  if a weakref with a callback,
-
+  its callback, and its weakly referenced object, all became part of
-- Added two builtin types, set() and frozenset().
+  cyclic garbage during a single run of garbage collection, the order
+  in which they were torn down was unpredictable.  It was possible for
+  the callback to see partially-torn-down objects, leading to immediate
+  segfaults, or, if the callback resurrected garbage objects, to
+  resurrect insane objects that caused segfaults (or other surprises)
+  later.  In one sense this wasn't surprising, because Python's cyclic gc
+  had no knowledge of Python's weakref objects.  It does now.  When
+  weakrefs with callbacks become part of cyclic garbage now, those
+  weakrefs are cleared first.  The callbacks don't trigger then,
+  preventing the problems.  If you need callbacks to trigger, then just
+  as when cyclic gc is not involved, you need to write your code so
+  that weakref objects outlive the objects they weakly reference.
 
 - Critical bugfix, for SF bug 840829:  if cyclic garbage collection
   happened to occur during a weakref callback for a new-style class
@@ -22,6 +33,10 @@ Core and builtins
   in a debug build, a segfault occurred reliably very soon after).
   This has been repaired.
 
+- Compiler flags set in PYTHONSTARTUP are now active in __main__.
+
+- Added two builtin types, set() and frozenset().
+
 - Added a reversed() builtin function that returns a reverse iterator
   over a sequence.
 

Modules/gc_weakref.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+Before 2.3.3, Python's cyclic gc didn't pay any attention to weakrefs.
+Segfaults in Zope3 resulted.
+
+weakrefs in Python are designed to, at worst, let *other* objects learn
+that a given object has died, via a callback function.  The weakly
+referenced object itself is not passed to the callback, and the presumption
+is that the weakly referenced object is unreachable trash at the time the
+callback is invoked.
+
+That's usually true, but not always.  Suppose a weakly referenced object
+becomes part of a clump of cyclic trash.  When enough cycles are broken by
+cyclic gc that the object is reclaimed, the callback is invoked.  If it's
+possible for the callback to get at objects in the cycle(s), then it may be
+possible for those objects to access (via strong references in the cycle)
+the weakly referenced object being torn down, or other objects in the cycle
+that have already suffered a tp_clear() call.  There's no guarantee that an
+object is in a sane state after tp_clear().  Bad things (including
+segfaults) can happen right then, during the callback's execution, or can
+happen at any later time if the callback manages to resurrect an insane
+object.
+
+Note that if it's possible for the callback to get at objects in the trash
+cycles, it must also be the case that the callback itself is part of the
+trash cycles.  Else the callback would have acted as an external root to
+the current collection, and nothing reachable from it would be in cyclic
+trash either.
+
+More, if the callback itself is in cyclic trash, then the weakref to which
+the callback is attached must also be trash, and for the same kind of
+reason:  if the weakref acted as an external root, then the callback could
+not have been cyclic trash.
+
+So a problem here requires that a weakref, that weakref's callback, and the
+weakly referenced object, all be in cyclic trash at the same time.  This
+isn't easy to stumble into by accident while Python is running, and, indeed,
+it took quite a while to dream up failing test cases.  Zope3 saw segfaults
+during shutdown, during the second call of gc in Py_Finalize, after most
+modules had been torn down.  That creates many trash cycles (esp. those
+involving new-style classes), making the problem much more likely.  Once you
+know what's required to provoke the problem, though, it's easy to create
+tests that segfault before shutdown.
+
+In 2.3.3, before breaking cycles, we first clear all the weakrefs with
+callbacks in cyclic trash.  Since the weakrefs *are* trash, and there's no
+defined-- or even predictable --order in which tp_clear() gets called on
+cyclic trash, it's defensible to first clear weakrefs with callbacks.  It's
+a feature of Python's weakrefs too that when a weakref goes away, the
+callback (if any) associated with it is thrown away too, unexecuted.
+
+Just that much is almost enough to prevent problems, by throwing away
+*almost* all the weakref callbacks that could get triggered by gc.  The
+problem remaining is that clearing a weakref with a callback decrefs the
+callback object, and the callback object may *itself* be weakly referenced,
+via another weakref with another callback.  So the process of clearing
+weakrefs can trigger callbacks attached to other weakrefs, and those
+latter weakrefs may or may not be part of cyclic trash.
+
+So, to prevent any Python code from running while gc is invoking tp_clear()
+on all the objects in cyclic trash, it's not quite enough just to invoke
+tp_clear() on weakrefs with callbacks first.  Instead the weakref module
+grew a new private function (_PyWeakref_ClearRef) that does only part of
+tp_clear():  it removes the weakref from the weakly-referenced object's list
+of weakrefs, but does not decref the callback object.  So calling
+_PyWeakref_ClearRef(wr) ensures that wr's callback object will never
+trigger, and (unlike weakref's tp_clear()) also prevents any callback
+associated *with* wr's callback object from triggering.
+
+Then we can call tp_clear on all the cyclic objects and never trigger
+Python code.
+
+After we do that, the callback objects still need to be decref'ed.  Callbacks
+(if any) *on* the callback objects that were also part of cyclic trash won't
+get invoked, because we cleared all trash weakrefs with callbacks at the
+start.  Callbacks on the callback objects that were not part of cyclic trash
+acted as external roots to everything reachable from them, so nothing
+reachable from them was part of cyclic trash, so gc didn't do any damage to
+objects reachable from them, and it's safe to call them at the end of gc.
+
+An alternative would have been to treat objects with callbacks like objects
+with __del__ methods, refusing to collect them, appending them to gc.garbage
+instead.  That would have been much easier.  Jim Fulton gave a strong
+argument against that (on Python-Dev):
+
+    There's a big difference between __del__ and weakref callbacks.
+    The __del__ method is "internal" to a design.  When you design a
+    class with a del method, you know you have to avoid including the
+    class in cycles.
+
+    Now, suppose you have a design that makes has no __del__ methods but
+    that does use cyclic data structures.  You reason about the design,
+    run tests, and convince yourself you don't have a leak.
+
+    Now, suppose some external code creates a weakref to one of your
+    objects.  All of a sudden, you start leaking.  You can look at your
+    code all you want and you won't find a reason for the leak.
+
+IOW, a class designer can out-think __del__ problems, but has no control
+over who creates weakrefs to his classes or class instances.  The class
+user has little chance either of predicting when the weakrefs he creates
+may end up in cycles.
+
+Callbacks on weakref callbacks are executed in an arbitrary order, and
+that's not good (a primary reason not to collect cycles with objects with
+__del__ methods is to avoid running finalizers in an arbitrary order).
+However, a weakref callback on a weakref callback has got to be rare.
+It's possible to do such a thing, so gc has to be robust against it, but
+I doubt anyone has done it outside the test case I wrote for it.

Modules/gcmodule.c

@@ -396,13 +396,17 @@ has_finalizer(PyObject *op)
 		return 0;
 }
 
-/* Move the objects in unreachable with __del__ methods into finalizers.
+/* Move the objects in unreachable with __del__ methods into finalizers,
- * The objects remaining in unreachable do not have __del__ methods, and
+ * and weakrefs with callbacks into wr_callbacks.
- * gc_refs remains GC_TENTATIVELY_UNREACHABLE for them.  The objects
+ * The objects remaining in unreachable do not have __del__ methods, and are
- * moved into finalizers have gc_refs changed to GC_REACHABLE.
+ * not weakrefs with callbacks.
+ * The objects moved have gc_refs changed to GC_REACHABLE; the objects
+ * remaining in unreachable are left at GC_TENTATIVELY_UNREACHABLE.
  */
 static void
-move_finalizers(PyGC_Head *unreachable, PyGC_Head *finalizers)
+move_troublemakers(PyGC_Head *unreachable,
+		   PyGC_Head *finalizers,
+		   PyGC_Head *wr_callbacks)
 {
 	PyGC_Head *gc = unreachable->gc.gc_next;
 
@@ -417,6 +421,12 @@ move_finalizers(PyGC_Head *unreachable, PyGC_Head *finalizers)
 			gc_list_append(gc, finalizers);
 			gc->gc.gc_refs = GC_REACHABLE;
 		}
+		else if (PyWeakref_Check(op) &&
+			 ((PyWeakReference *)op)->wr_callback) {
+			gc_list_remove(gc);
+			gc_list_append(gc, wr_callbacks);
+			gc->gc.gc_refs = GC_REACHABLE;
+		}
 		gc = next;
 	}
 }
@@ -453,6 +463,93 @@ move_finalizer_reachable(PyGC_Head *finalizers)
 	}
 }
 
+/* Clear all trash weakrefs with callbacks.  This clears weakrefs first,
+ * which has the happy result of disabling the callbacks without executing
+ * them.  A nasty technical complication:  a weakref callback can itself be
+ * the target of a weakref, in which case decrefing the callback can cause
+ * another callback to trigger.  But we can't allow arbitrary Python code to
+ * get executed at this point (the callback on the callback may try to muck
+ * with other cyclic trash we're trying to collect, even resurrecting it
+ * while we're in the middle of doing tp_clear() on the trash).
+ *
+ * The private _PyWeakref_ClearRef() function exists so that we can clear
+ * the reference in a weakref without triggering a callback on the callback.
+ *
+ * We have to save the callback objects and decref them later.  But we can't
+ * allocate new memory to save them (if we can't get new memory, we're dead).
+ * So we grab a new reference on the clear'ed weakref, which prevents the
+ * rest of gc from reclaiming it.  _PyWeakref_ClearRef() leaves the
+ * weakref's wr_callback member intact.
+ *
+ * In the end, then, wr_callbacks consists of cleared weakrefs that are
+ * immune from collection.  Near the end of gc, after collecting all the
+ * cyclic trash, we call release_weakrefs().  That releases our references
+ * to the cleared weakrefs, which in turn may trigger callbacks on their
+ * callbacks.
+ */
+static void
+clear_weakrefs(PyGC_Head *wr_callbacks)
+{
+	PyGC_Head *gc = wr_callbacks->gc.gc_next;
+
+	for (; gc != wr_callbacks; gc = gc->gc.gc_next) {
+		PyObject *op = FROM_GC(gc);
+		PyWeakReference *wr;
+
+		assert(IS_REACHABLE(op));
+		assert(PyWeakref_Check(op));
+		wr = (PyWeakReference *)op;
+		assert(wr->wr_callback != NULL);
+		Py_INCREF(op);
+		_PyWeakref_ClearRef(wr);
+	}
+}
+
+/* Called near the end of gc.  This gives up the references we own to
+ * cleared weakrefs, allowing them to get collected, and in turn decref'ing
+ * their callbacks.
+ *
+ * If a callback object is itself the target of a weakref callback,
+ * decref'ing the callback object may trigger that other callback.  If
+ * that other callback was part of the cyclic trash in this generation,
+ * that won't happen, since we cleared *all* trash-weakref callbacks near
+ * the start of gc.  If that other callback was not part of the cyclic trash
+ * in this generation, then it acted like an external root to this round
+ * of gc, so all the objects reachable from that callback are still alive.
+ *
+ * Giving up the references to the weakref objects will probably make
+ * them go away too.  However, if a weakref is reachable from finalizers,
+ * it won't go away.  We move it to the old generation then.  Since a
+ * weakref object doesn't have a finalizer, that's the right thing to do (it
+ * doesn't belong in gc.garbage).
+ *
+ * We return the number of weakref objects freed (those not appended to old).
+ */
+static int
+release_weakrefs(PyGC_Head *wr_callbacks, PyGC_Head *old)
+{
+	int num_freed = 0;
+
+	while (! gc_list_is_empty(wr_callbacks)) {
+		PyGC_Head *gc = wr_callbacks->gc.gc_next;
+		PyObject *op = FROM_GC(gc);
+		PyWeakReference *wr = (PyWeakReference *)op;
+
+		assert(IS_REACHABLE(op));
+		assert(PyWeakref_Check(op));
+		assert(wr->wr_callback != NULL);
+		Py_DECREF(op);
+		if (wr_callbacks->gc.gc_next == gc) {
+			/* object is still alive -- move it */
+			gc_list_remove(gc);
+			gc_list_append(gc, old);
+		}
+		else
+			++num_freed;
+	}
+	return num_freed;
+}
+
 static void
 debug_instance(char *msg, PyInstanceObject *inst)
 {
@@ -554,8 +651,9 @@ collect(int generation)
 	long n = 0;	/* # unreachable objects that couldn't be collected */
 	PyGC_Head *young; /* the generation we are examining */
 	PyGC_Head *old; /* next older generation */
-	PyGC_Head unreachable;
+	PyGC_Head unreachable; /* non-problematic unreachable trash */
-	PyGC_Head finalizers;
+	PyGC_Head finalizers;  /* objects with, & reachable from, __del__ */
+	PyGC_Head wr_callbacks;  /* weakrefs with callbacks */
 	PyGC_Head *gc;
 
 	if (delstr == NULL) {
@@ -616,20 +714,33 @@ collect(int generation)
 	/* All objects in unreachable are trash, but objects reachable from
 	 * finalizers can't safely be deleted.  Python programmers should take
 	 * care not to create such things.  For Python, finalizers means
-	 * instance objects with __del__ methods.
+	 * instance objects with __del__ methods.  Weakrefs with callbacks
+	 * can call arbitrary Python code, so those are special-cased too.
 	 *
-	 * Move unreachable objects with finalizers into a different list.
+	 * Move unreachable objects with finalizers, and weakrefs with
+	 * callbacks, into different lists.
  	 */
 	gc_list_init(&finalizers);
-	move_finalizers(&unreachable, &finalizers);
+	gc_list_init(&wr_callbacks);
+	move_troublemakers(&unreachable, &finalizers, &wr_callbacks);
+	/* Clear the trash weakrefs with callbacks.  This prevents their
+	 * callbacks from getting invoked (when a weakref goes away, so does
+	 * its callback).
+	 * We do this even if the weakrefs are reachable from finalizers.
+	 * If we didn't, breaking cycles in unreachable later could trigger
+	 * deallocation of objects in finalizers, which could in turn
+	 * cause callbacks to trigger.  This may not be ideal behavior.
+	 */
+	clear_weakrefs(&wr_callbacks);
 	/* finalizers contains the unreachable objects with a finalizer;
-	 * unreachable objects reachable only *from* those are also
+	 * unreachable objects reachable *from* those are also uncollectable,
-	 * uncollectable, and we move those into the finalizers list too.
+	 * and we move those into the finalizers list too.
 	 */
 	move_finalizer_reachable(&finalizers);
 
 	/* Collect statistics on collectable objects found and print
-	 * debugging information. */
+	 * debugging information.
+	 */
 	for (gc = unreachable.gc.gc_next; gc != &unreachable;
 			gc = gc->gc.gc_next) {
 		m++;
@@ -643,6 +754,11 @@ collect(int generation)
 	 */
 	delete_garbage(&unreachable, old);
 
+        /* Now that we're done analyzing stuff and breaking cycles, let
+         * delayed weakref callbacks run.
+         */
+	m += release_weakrefs(&wr_callbacks, old);
+
 	/* Collect statistics on uncollectable objects found and print
 	 * debugging information. */
 	for (gc = finalizers.gc.gc_next;

Objects/weakrefobject.c

@@ -53,17 +53,43 @@ clear_weakref(PyWeakReference *self)
         if (*list == self)
             *list = self->wr_next;
         self->wr_object = Py_None;
-        self->wr_callback = NULL;
         if (self->wr_prev != NULL)
             self->wr_prev->wr_next = self->wr_next;
         if (self->wr_next != NULL)
             self->wr_next->wr_prev = self->wr_prev;
         self->wr_prev = NULL;
         self->wr_next = NULL;
-        Py_XDECREF(callback);
+    }
+    if (callback != NULL) {
+        Py_DECREF(callback);
+        self->wr_callback = NULL;
     }
 }
 
+/* Cyclic gc uses this to *just* clear the passed-in reference, leaving
+ * the callback intact and uncalled.  It must be possible to call self's
+ * tp_dealloc() after calling this, so self has to be left in a sane enough
+ * state for that to work.  We expect tp_dealloc to decref the callback
+ * then.  The reason for not letting clear_weakref() decref the callback
+ * right now is that if the callback goes away, that may in turn trigger
+ * another callback (if a weak reference to the callback exists) -- running
+ * arbitrary Python code in the middle of gc is a disaster.  The convolution
+ * here allows gc to delay triggering such callbacks until the world is in
+ * a sane state again.
+ */
+void
+_PyWeakref_ClearRef(PyWeakReference *self)
+{
+    PyObject *callback;
+
+    assert(self != NULL);
+    assert(PyWeakref_Check(self));
+    /* Preserve and restore the callback around clear_weakref. */
+    callback = self->wr_callback;
+    self->wr_callback = NULL;
+    clear_weakref(self);
+    self->wr_callback = callback;
+}
 
 static void
 weakref_dealloc(PyWeakReference *self)
@@ -117,7 +143,7 @@ weakref_hash(PyWeakReference *self)
     self->hash = PyObject_Hash(PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT(self));
     return self->hash;
 }
-    
+
 
 static PyObject *
 weakref_repr(PyWeakReference *self)
@@ -324,7 +350,7 @@ WRAP_BINARY(proxy_iand, PyNumber_InPlaceAnd)
 WRAP_BINARY(proxy_ixor, PyNumber_InPlaceXor)
 WRAP_BINARY(proxy_ior, PyNumber_InPlaceOr)
 
-static int 
+static int
 proxy_nonzero(PyWeakReference *proxy)
 {
     PyObject *o = PyWeakref_GET_OBJECT(proxy);