Bug #1777168: replace operator names "opa"... with "op1"... and mark everything up as literal,
to enhance readability.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ff457b1d05
commit
32008321f5
|
@ -1008,12 +1008,12 @@ Comparisons can be chained arbitrarily, e.g., ``x < y <= z`` is equivalent to
|
|||
``x < y and y <= z``, except that ``y`` is evaluated only once (but in both
|
||||
cases ``z`` is not evaluated at all when ``x < y`` is found to be false).
|
||||
|
||||
Formally, if *a*, *b*, *c*, ..., *y*, *z* are expressions and *opa*, *opb*, ...,
|
||||
*opy* are comparison operators, then *a opa b opb c* ...*y opy z* is equivalent
|
||||
to *a opa b* :keyword:`and` *b opb c* :keyword:`and` ... *y opy z*, except that
|
||||
each expression is evaluated at most once.
|
||||
Formally, if *a*, *b*, *c*, ..., *y*, *z* are expressions and *op1*, *op2*, ...,
|
||||
*opN* are comparison operators, then ``a op1 b op2 c ... y opN z`` is equivalent
|
||||
to ``a op1 b and b op2 c and ... y opN z``, except that each expression is
|
||||
evaluated at most once.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that *a opa b opb c* doesn't imply any kind of comparison between *a* and
|
||||
Note that ``a op1 b op2 c`` doesn't imply any kind of comparison between *a* and
|
||||
*c*, so that, e.g., ``x < y > z`` is perfectly legal (though perhaps not
|
||||
pretty).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue