Updated the INST/OBJ docs, to say they really are (almost) identical

in 2.3.
This commit is contained in:
Tim Peters 2003-01-30 16:35:08 +00:00
parent d01c1e91c4
commit 2b93c4c708
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1614,6 +1614,8 @@ opcodes = [
the class object obtained from INST's arguments is applied to the
argtuple obtained from the stack, and the resulting instance object
is pushed on the stack.
NOTE: checks for __safe_for_unpickling__ went away in Python 2.3.
"""),
I(name='OBJ',
@ -1643,6 +1645,10 @@ opcodes = [
except that no __safe_for_unpickling__ check is done (XXX this is
a bug; cPickle does test __safe_for_unpickling__). See INST for
the gory details.
NOTE: In Python 2.3, INST and OBJ are identical except for how they
get the class object. That was always the intent; the implementations
had diverged for accidental reasons.
"""),
I(name='NEWOBJ',