I thought it was common practice to check things compiled before

checking them in?  Oh well, this fixes various obvious mistakes and
changes a subsubsubsection (which doesn't exist) into a subsubsection
(which does).  I'm not sure this matches the intent, but it seems to
read OK on a quick skim.
This commit is contained in:
Michael W. Hudson 2003-03-05 14:20:58 +00:00
parent 7a924e6eb2
commit 2ab1d08f90
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ assignment. This should only be implemented if \samp{del
obj.\var{name}} is meaningful for the object.
\end{methoddesc}
\subsubsection{More attribute access for new-style classes \lable{new-style-attribute-access}}
\subsubsection{More attribute access for new-style classes \label{new-style-attribute-access}}
The following methods only apply to new-style classes.
@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ name to access any attributes it needs to access, for example,
\samp{object.__getattribute__(self, name)}.
\end{methoddesc}
\subsubsubsection{Implementing Descriptors \label{descriptors}}
\subsubsection{Implementing Descriptors \label{descriptors}}
The following methods only apply when an instance of the class
containing the method (a so-called \emph{descriptor} class) is in
@ -1235,13 +1235,13 @@ return the (computed) attribute value or raise an
\end{methoddesc}
\begin{methoddesc}[object]{__set__}{self, instance, value}
Called to set the attribute on an instance \{instance} of the owner
Called to set the attribute on an instance \var{instance} of the owner
class to a new value, \var{value}.
\end{methoddesc}
\begin{methoddesc}[object]{__delete__}{self, instance}
Called to delete the attribute on an instance \{instance} of the owner
class.
Called to delete the attribute on an instance \var{instance} of the
owner class.
\end{methoddesc}