traverseda
/
cpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Changed applicable use of ``char *`` declarations that are passed into 

PyArg_ParseTuple() to ``const char *`` to match the recommendation made in
section 1.3 and to support better coding habits.

Section 1.8 ("Keyword Parameters for Extension Functions") and it's coding
example were not touched since it is stems from an accredited source and thus
did not want to step on anyone's toes.
This commit is contained in:
Brett Cannon 2004-06-29 03:48:23 +00:00
parent 93d1b2c93c
commit 289e4cba1c
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
Doc/ext/extending.tex
View File

@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ is evaluated (we'll see shortly how it ends up being called):
static PyObject *
spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
{
char *command;
const char *command;
int sts;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))
@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ Some example calls:
int ok;
int i, j;
long k, l;
char *s;
const char *s;
int size;
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ""); /* No arguments */
@ -659,8 +659,8 @@ Some example calls:
\begin{verbatim}
{
char *file;
char *mode = "r";
const char *file;
const char *mode = "r";
int bufsize = 0;
ok = PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s|si", &file, &mode, &bufsize);
/* A string, and optionally another string and an integer */
@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ declared \keyword{static} like everything else:
\begin{verbatim}
static int
PySpam_System(char *command)
PySpam_System(const char *command)
{
return system(command);
}
@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ The function \cfunction{spam_system()} is modified in a trivial way:
static PyObject *
spam_system(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
{
char *command;
const char *command;
int sts;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "s", &command))