Issue #25969: Update the lib2to3 grammar to handle the unpacking

generalizations added in 3.5.
This commit is contained in:
Gregory P. Smith ext:(%20%5BGoogle%20Inc.%5D) 2016-09-09 18:18:52 -07:00
parent dbdf029a55
commit 28325749c0
7 changed files with 91 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -138,15 +138,26 @@ subscript: test | [test] ':' [test] [sliceop]
sliceop: ':' [test] sliceop: ':' [test]
exprlist: (expr|star_expr) (',' (expr|star_expr))* [','] exprlist: (expr|star_expr) (',' (expr|star_expr))* [',']
testlist: test (',' test)* [','] testlist: test (',' test)* [',']
dictsetmaker: ( (test ':' test (comp_for | (',' test ':' test)* [','])) | dictsetmaker: ( ((test ':' test | '**' expr)
(test (comp_for | (',' test)* [','])) ) (comp_for | (',' (test ':' test | '**' expr))* [','])) |
((test | star_expr)
(comp_for | (',' (test | star_expr))* [','])) )
classdef: 'class' NAME ['(' [arglist] ')'] ':' suite classdef: 'class' NAME ['(' [arglist] ')'] ':' suite
arglist: (argument ',')* (argument [','] arglist: argument (',' argument)* [',']
|'*' test (',' argument)* [',' '**' test]
|'**' test) # "test '=' test" is really "keyword '=' test", but we have no such token.
argument: test [comp_for] | test '=' test # Really [keyword '='] test # These need to be in a single rule to avoid grammar that is ambiguous
# to our LL(1) parser. Even though 'test' includes '*expr' in star_expr,
# we explicitly match '*' here, too, to give it proper precedence.
# Illegal combinations and orderings are blocked in ast.c:
# multiple (test comp_for) arguements are blocked; keyword unpackings
# that precede iterable unpackings are blocked; etc.
argument: ( test [comp_for] |
test '=' test |
'**' expr |
star_expr )
comp_iter: comp_for | comp_if comp_iter: comp_for | comp_if
comp_for: 'for' exprlist 'in' testlist_safe [comp_iter] comp_for: 'for' exprlist 'in' testlist_safe [comp_iter]

View File

@ -34,6 +34,17 @@ class FixApply(fixer_base.BaseFix):
func = results["func"] func = results["func"]
args = results["args"] args = results["args"]
kwds = results.get("kwds") kwds = results.get("kwds")
# I feel like we should be able to express this logic in the
# PATTERN above but I don't know how to do it so...
if args:
if args.type == self.syms.star_expr:
return # Make no change.
if (args.type == self.syms.argument and
args.children[0].value == '**'):
return # Make no change.
if kwds and (kwds.type == self.syms.argument and
kwds.children[0].value == '**'):
return # Make no change.
prefix = node.prefix prefix = node.prefix
func = func.clone() func = func.clone()
if (func.type not in (token.NAME, syms.atom) and if (func.type not in (token.NAME, syms.atom) and

View File

@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ class FixIntern(fixer_base.BaseFix):
""" """
def transform(self, node, results): def transform(self, node, results):
if results:
# I feel like we should be able to express this logic in the
# PATTERN above but I don't know how to do it so...
obj = results['obj']
if obj:
if obj.type == self.syms.star_expr:
return # Make no change.
if (obj.type == self.syms.argument and
obj.children[0].value == '**'):
return # Make no change.
names = ('sys', 'intern') names = ('sys', 'intern')
new = ImportAndCall(node, results, names) new = ImportAndCall(node, results, names)
touch_import(None, 'sys', node) touch_import(None, 'sys', node)

View File

@ -22,6 +22,17 @@ class FixReload(fixer_base.BaseFix):
""" """
def transform(self, node, results): def transform(self, node, results):
if results:
# I feel like we should be able to express this logic in the
# PATTERN above but I don't know how to do it so...
obj = results['obj']
print('obj:', repr(obj))
if obj:
if obj.type == self.syms.star_expr:
return # Make no change.
if (obj.type == self.syms.argument and
obj.children[0].value == '**'):
return # Make no change.
names = ('imp', 'reload') names = ('imp', 'reload')
new = ImportAndCall(node, results, names) new = ImportAndCall(node, results, names)
touch_import(None, 'imp', node) touch_import(None, 'imp', node)

View File

@ -260,6 +260,10 @@ class Test_apply(FixerTestCase):
s = """apply(f, *args)""" s = """apply(f, *args)"""
self.unchanged(s) self.unchanged(s)
def test_unchanged_6b(self):
s = """apply(f, **kwds)"""
self.unchanged(s)
def test_unchanged_7(self): def test_unchanged_7(self):
s = """apply(func=f, args=args, kwds=kwds)""" s = """apply(func=f, args=args, kwds=kwds)"""
self.unchanged(s) self.unchanged(s)

View File

@ -208,6 +208,41 @@ class TestRaiseChanges(GrammarTest):
self.invalid_syntax("raise E from") self.invalid_syntax("raise E from")
# Modelled after Lib/test/test_grammar.py:TokenTests.test_funcdef issue2292
# and Lib/test/text_parser.py test_list_displays, test_set_displays,
# test_dict_displays, test_argument_unpacking, ... changes.
class TestUnpackingGeneralizations(GrammarTest):
def test_mid_positional_star(self):
self.validate("""func(1, *(2, 3), 4)""")
def test_double_star_dict_literal(self):
self.validate("""func(**{'eggs':'scrambled', 'spam':'fried'})""")
def test_double_star_dict_literal_after_keywords(self):
self.validate("""func(spam='fried', **{'eggs':'scrambled'})""")
def test_list_display(self):
self.validate("""[*{2}, 3, *[4]]""")
def test_set_display(self):
self.validate("""{*{2}, 3, *[4]}""")
def test_dict_display_1(self):
self.validate("""{**{}}""")
def test_dict_display_2(self):
self.validate("""{**{}, 3:4, **{5:6, 7:8}}""")
def test_argument_unpacking_1(self):
self.validate("""f(a, *b, *c, d)""")
def test_argument_unpacking_2(self):
self.validate("""f(**a, **b)""")
def test_argument_unpacking_3(self):
self.validate("""f(2, *a, *b, **b, **c, **d)""")
# Adapted from Python 3's Lib/test/test_grammar.py:GrammarTests.testFuncdef # Adapted from Python 3's Lib/test/test_grammar.py:GrammarTests.testFuncdef
class TestFunctionAnnotations(GrammarTest): class TestFunctionAnnotations(GrammarTest):
def test_1(self): def test_1(self):

View File

@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ Core and Builtins
Library Library
------- -------
- Issue #25969: Update the lib2to3 grammar to handle the unpacking
generalizations added in 3.5.
- Issue #27932: Fixes memory leak in platform.win32_ver() - Issue #27932: Fixes memory leak in platform.win32_ver()
- Issue #14977: mailcap now respects the order of the lines in the mailcap - Issue #14977: mailcap now respects the order of the lines in the mailcap