bpo-37599: Remove a vague statement in documentation of Integer Objects (#14786)
* Remove a vague statement in documentation * Remove another vague sentence A sentence starting with "So it should be possible..." shouldn't be in the docs either. Co-Authored-By: Kyle Stanley <aeros167@gmail.com> * Include the removal of the previous line Co-Authored-By: Kyle Stanley <aeros167@gmail.com> * Remove an extra space
This commit is contained in:
parent
a0f7119f15
commit
1d8b04edfd
|
@ -42,9 +42,7 @@ distinguished from a number. Use :c:func:`PyErr_Occurred` to disambiguate.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The current implementation keeps an array of integer objects for all integers
|
The current implementation keeps an array of integer objects for all integers
|
||||||
between ``-5`` and ``256``, when you create an int in that range you actually
|
between ``-5`` and ``256``, when you create an int in that range you actually
|
||||||
just get back a reference to the existing object. So it should be possible to
|
just get back a reference to the existing object.
|
||||||
change the value of ``1``. I suspect the behaviour of Python in this case is
|
|
||||||
undefined. :-)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
.. c:function:: PyObject* PyLong_FromUnsignedLong(unsigned long v)
|
.. c:function:: PyObject* PyLong_FromUnsignedLong(unsigned long v)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue