bpo-37004: Documented asymmetry of string arguments in difflib.SequenceMatcher for ratio method (GH-13482) (#15157)

https://bugs.python.org/issue37004
(cherry picked from commit e9cbcd0018)

Co-authored-by: sweeneyde <36520290+sweeneyde@users.noreply.github.com>

Doc/library/difflib.rst

@@ -543,6 +543,16 @@ The :class:`SequenceMatcher` class has this constructor:
       to try :meth:`quick_ratio` or :meth:`real_quick_ratio` first to get an
       upper bound.
 
+      .. note::
+
+         Caution: The result of a :meth:`ratio` call may depend on the order of
+         the arguments. For instance::
+
+            >>> SequenceMatcher(None, 'tide', 'diet').ratio()
+            0.25
+            >>> SequenceMatcher(None, 'diet', 'tide').ratio()
+            0.5
+
 
    .. method:: quick_ratio()
 

Misc/NEWS.d/next/Documentation/2019-05-22-04-30-07.bpo-37004.BRgxrt.rst

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+In the documentation for difflib, a note was added explicitly warning that the results of SequenceMatcher's ratio method may depend on the order of the input strings.