Fix minor usage and consistency nits.

This commit is contained in:
Fred Drake 2001-09-18 17:58:20 +00:00
parent 624c8af706
commit 18d8d5a708
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1145,9 +1145,10 @@ multiplication (meaning repetition) by defining the methods
\method{__mul__()}, \method{__rmul__()} and \method{__imul__()} described \method{__mul__()}, \method{__rmul__()} and \method{__imul__()} described
below; they should not define \method{__coerce__()} or other numerical below; they should not define \method{__coerce__()} or other numerical
operators. It is recommended that both mappings and sequences operators. It is recommended that both mappings and sequences
implement the \method{__contains__}, to allow efficient use of the implement the \method{__contains__()} method to allow efficient use of
\code{in} operator; for mappings, \code{in} should be equivalent of the \code{in} operator; for mappings, \code{in} should be equivalent
\method{has_key()}; for sequences, it should search through the values. of \method{has_key()}; for sequences, it should search through the
values.
\withsubitem{(mapping object method)}{ \withsubitem{(mapping object method)}{
\ttindex{keys()} \ttindex{keys()}
\ttindex{values()} \ttindex{values()}
@ -1310,7 +1311,7 @@ the \method{__*item__()} methods.
Calling \code{max(0, i)} conveniently returns the proper value. Calling \code{max(0, i)} conveniently returns the proper value.
The membership test operators (\keyword{in} and \keyword{not in}) are The membership test operators (\keyword{in} and \keyword{not in}) are
normally implemented as iteration loop through the sequence. However, normally implemented as an iteration through the sequence. However,
sequence objects can supply the following special method with a more sequence objects can supply the following special method with a more
efficient implementation: efficient implementation: