Issue #25410: Made testing that od_fast_nodes and dk_entries are in sync more
reliable.
This commit is contained in:
commit
0c009bf3b5
|
@ -481,10 +481,12 @@ struct _odictobject {
|
|||
PyDictObject od_dict; /* the underlying dict */
|
||||
_ODictNode *od_first; /* first node in the linked list, if any */
|
||||
_ODictNode *od_last; /* last node in the linked list, if any */
|
||||
/* od_fast_nodes and od_resize_sentinel are managed by _odict_resize()
|
||||
/* od_fast_nodes, od_fast_nodes_size and od_resize_sentinel are managed
|
||||
* by _odict_resize().
|
||||
* Note that we rely on implementation details of dict for both. */
|
||||
_ODictNode **od_fast_nodes; /* hash table that mirrors the dict table */
|
||||
Py_uintptr_t od_resize_sentinel; /* changes if odict should be resized */
|
||||
Py_ssize_t od_fast_nodes_size;
|
||||
void *od_resize_sentinel; /* changes if odict should be resized */
|
||||
|
||||
size_t od_state; /* incremented whenever the LL changes */
|
||||
PyObject *od_inst_dict; /* OrderedDict().__dict__ */
|
||||
|
@ -573,7 +575,8 @@ _odict_resize(PyODictObject *od) {
|
|||
/* Replace the old fast nodes table. */
|
||||
_odict_free_fast_nodes(od);
|
||||
od->od_fast_nodes = fast_nodes;
|
||||
od->od_resize_sentinel = (Py_uintptr_t)(((PyDictObject *)od)->ma_keys);
|
||||
od->od_fast_nodes_size = size;
|
||||
od->od_resize_sentinel = ((PyDictObject *)od)->ma_keys;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -591,7 +594,8 @@ _odict_get_index(PyODictObject *od, PyObject *key)
|
|||
keys = ((PyDictObject *)od)->ma_keys;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Ensure od_fast_nodes and dk_entries are in sync. */
|
||||
if (od->od_resize_sentinel != (Py_uintptr_t)keys) {
|
||||
if (od->od_resize_sentinel != keys ||
|
||||
od->od_fast_nodes_size != keys->dk_size) {
|
||||
int resize_res = _odict_resize(od);
|
||||
if (resize_res < 0)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue