From 02ebf4f78b8f9cd753d4138e5b85323dec1f16d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sandro Tosi Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:36:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] grammatical fixes; from Darren Yin on docs@ --- Doc/howto/doanddont.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst b/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst index 15aa9960a4a..98dbad192de 100644 --- a/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst +++ b/Doc/howto/doanddont.rst @@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ Inside Function Definitions versions of Python do not check for the invalidity, it does not make it more valid, no more than having a smart lawyer makes a man innocent. Do not use it like that ever. Even in versions where it was accepted, it made the function -execution slower, because the compiler could not be certain which names are -local and which are global. In Python 2.1 this construct causes warnings, and +execution slower, because the compiler could not be certain which names were +local and which were global. In Python 2.1 this construct causes warnings, and sometimes even errors. @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ you can know where each toplevel name is defined by a simple "search" function in your favourite editor. You also open yourself to trouble in the future, if some module grows additional functions or classes. -One of the most awful question asked on the newsgroup is why this code:: +One of the most awful questions asked on the newsgroup is why this code:: f = open("www") f.read()