bpo-27635: Fix pickle documentation about `__new__` not being called. (GH-19269)

Automerge-Triggered-By: @pitrou
(cherry picked from commit 482259d0dc)

Co-authored-by: Furkan Önder <furkantahaonder@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Miss Islington (bot) 2020-04-18 11:14:55 -07:00 committed by GitHub
parent bfda4db0d2
commit 020f2aaaea
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -639,9 +639,9 @@ the methods :meth:`__getstate__` and :meth:`__setstate__`.
At unpickling time, some methods like :meth:`__getattr__`, At unpickling time, some methods like :meth:`__getattr__`,
:meth:`__getattribute__`, or :meth:`__setattr__` may be called upon the :meth:`__getattribute__`, or :meth:`__setattr__` may be called upon the
instance. In case those methods rely on some internal invariant being instance. In case those methods rely on some internal invariant being
true, the type should implement :meth:`__getnewargs__` or true, the type should implement :meth:`__new__` to establish such an
:meth:`__getnewargs_ex__` to establish such an invariant; otherwise, invariant, as :meth:`__init__` is not called when unpickling an
neither :meth:`__new__` nor :meth:`__init__` will be called. instance.
.. index:: pair: copy; protocol .. index:: pair: copy; protocol

View File

@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
The pickle documentation incorrectly claimed that ``__new__`` isn't called by
default when unpickling.