traverseda
/
cpython
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity
cpython/Lib/test/output/test_coercion

1055 lines
35 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
test_coercion
2 + 2 = 4
2 += 2 => 4
2 - 2 = 0
2 -= 2 => 0
2 * 2 = 4
2 *= 2 => 4
2 / 2 = 1
2 /= 2 => 1
2 ** 2 = 4
2 **= 2 => 4
2 % 2 = 0
2 %= 2 => 0
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
2 + 4.0 = 6.0
2 += 4.0 => 6.0
2 - 4.0 = -2.0
2 -= 4.0 => -2.0
2 * 4.0 = 8.0
2 *= 4.0 => 8.0
2 / 4.0 = 0.5
2 /= 4.0 => 0.5
2 ** 4.0 = 16.0
2 **= 4.0 => 16.0
2 % 4.0 = 2.0
2 %= 4.0 => 2.0
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 + 2 = 4
2 += 2 => 4
2 - 2 = 0
2 -= 2 => 0
2 * 2 = 4
2 *= 2 => 4
2 / 2 = 1
2 /= 2 => 1
2 ** 2 = 4
2 **= 2 => 4
2 % 2 = 0
2 %= 2 => 0
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
2 + (2+0j) = (4+0j)
2 += (2+0j) => (4+0j)
2 - (2+0j) = 0j
2 -= (2+0j) => 0j
2 * (2+0j) = (4+0j)
2 *= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
2 / (2+0j) = (1+0j)
2 /= (2+0j) => (1+0j)
2 ** (2+0j) = (4+0j)
2 **= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
2 % (2+0j) = 0j
2 %= (2+0j) => 0j
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 * [1] = [1, 1]
Sequence repeat works now for in-place multiply with an integer type as the left operand. I don't know if this is a feature or a bug.
2001-01-03 21:36:25 -04:00
2 *= [1] => [1, 1]
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 += (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 * (2,) = (2, 2)
Sequence repeat works now for in-place multiply with an integer type as the left operand. I don't know if this is a feature or a bug.
2001-01-03 21:36:25 -04:00
2 *= (2,) => (2, 2)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 + None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 += None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 - None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 * None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 / None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 % None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 + <MethodNumber 1> = 3
2 += <MethodNumber 1> => 3
2 - <MethodNumber 1> = 1
2 -= <MethodNumber 1> => 1
2 * <MethodNumber 1> = 2
2 *= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
2 / <MethodNumber 1> = 2
2 /= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
2 ** <MethodNumber 1> = 2
2 **= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
2 % <MethodNumber 1> = 0
2 %= <MethodNumber 1> => 0
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
2 + <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
2 += <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
2 - <CoerceNumber 2> = 0
2 -= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0
2 * <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
2 *= <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
2 / <CoerceNumber 2> = 1
2 /= <CoerceNumber 2> => 1
2 ** <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
2 **= <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
2 % <CoerceNumber 2> = 0
2 %= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0
4.0 + 2 = 6.0
4.0 += 2 => 6.0
4.0 - 2 = 2.0
4.0 -= 2 => 2.0
4.0 * 2 = 8.0
4.0 *= 2 => 8.0
4.0 / 2 = 2.0
4.0 /= 2 => 2.0
4.0 ** 2 = 16.0
4.0 **= 2 => 16.0
4.0 % 2 = 0.0
4.0 %= 2 => 0.0
4.0 + 4.0 = 8.0
4.0 += 4.0 => 8.0
4.0 - 4.0 = 0.0
4.0 -= 4.0 => 0.0
4.0 * 4.0 = 16.0
4.0 *= 4.0 => 16.0
4.0 / 4.0 = 1.0
4.0 /= 4.0 => 1.0
4.0 ** 4.0 = 256.0
4.0 **= 4.0 => 256.0
4.0 % 4.0 = 0.0
4.0 %= 4.0 => 0.0
4.0 + 2 = 6.0
4.0 += 2 => 6.0
4.0 - 2 = 2.0
4.0 -= 2 => 2.0
4.0 * 2 = 8.0
4.0 *= 2 => 8.0
4.0 / 2 = 2.0
4.0 /= 2 => 2.0
4.0 ** 2 = 16.0
4.0 **= 2 => 16.0
4.0 % 2 = 0.0
4.0 %= 2 => 0.0
4.0 + (2+0j) = (6+0j)
4.0 += (2+0j) => (6+0j)
4.0 - (2+0j) = (2+0j)
4.0 -= (2+0j) => (2+0j)
4.0 * (2+0j) = (8+0j)
4.0 *= (2+0j) => (8+0j)
4.0 / (2+0j) = (2+0j)
4.0 /= (2+0j) => (2+0j)
4.0 ** (2+0j) = (16+0j)
4.0 **= (2+0j) => (16+0j)
4.0 % (2+0j) = 0j
4.0 %= (2+0j) => 0j
4.0 + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 * [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 *= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 += (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 * (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 *= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 + None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 += None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 - None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 * None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 / None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 % None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
4.0 + <MethodNumber 1> = 5.0
4.0 += <MethodNumber 1> => 5.0
4.0 - <MethodNumber 1> = 3.0
4.0 -= <MethodNumber 1> => 3.0
4.0 * <MethodNumber 1> = 4.0
4.0 *= <MethodNumber 1> => 4.0
4.0 / <MethodNumber 1> = 4.0
4.0 /= <MethodNumber 1> => 4.0
4.0 ** <MethodNumber 1> = 4.0
4.0 **= <MethodNumber 1> => 4.0
4.0 % <MethodNumber 1> = 0.0
4.0 %= <MethodNumber 1> => 0.0
4.0 + <CoerceNumber 2> = 6.0
4.0 += <CoerceNumber 2> => 6.0
4.0 - <CoerceNumber 2> = 2.0
4.0 -= <CoerceNumber 2> => 2.0
4.0 * <CoerceNumber 2> = 8.0
4.0 *= <CoerceNumber 2> => 8.0
4.0 / <CoerceNumber 2> = 2.0
4.0 /= <CoerceNumber 2> => 2.0
4.0 ** <CoerceNumber 2> = 16.0
4.0 **= <CoerceNumber 2> => 16.0
4.0 % <CoerceNumber 2> = 0.0
4.0 %= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0.0
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 + 2 = 4
2 += 2 => 4
2 - 2 = 0
2 -= 2 => 0
2 * 2 = 4
2 *= 2 => 4
2 / 2 = 1
2 /= 2 => 1
2 ** 2 = 4
2 **= 2 => 4
2 % 2 = 0
2 %= 2 => 0
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
2 + 4.0 = 6.0
2 += 4.0 => 6.0
2 - 4.0 = -2.0
2 -= 4.0 => -2.0
2 * 4.0 = 8.0
2 *= 4.0 => 8.0
2 / 4.0 = 0.5
2 /= 4.0 => 0.5
2 ** 4.0 = 16.0
2 **= 4.0 => 16.0
2 % 4.0 = 2.0
2 %= 4.0 => 2.0
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 + 2 = 4
2 += 2 => 4
2 - 2 = 0
2 -= 2 => 0
2 * 2 = 4
2 *= 2 => 4
2 / 2 = 1
2 /= 2 => 1
2 ** 2 = 4
2 **= 2 => 4
2 % 2 = 0
2 %= 2 => 0
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
2 + (2+0j) = (4+0j)
2 += (2+0j) => (4+0j)
2 - (2+0j) = 0j
2 -= (2+0j) => 0j
2 * (2+0j) = (4+0j)
2 *= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
2 / (2+0j) = (1+0j)
2 /= (2+0j) => (1+0j)
2 ** (2+0j) = (4+0j)
2 **= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
2 % (2+0j) = 0j
2 %= (2+0j) => 0j
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 * [1] = [1, 1]
Sequence repeat works now for in-place multiply with an integer type as the left operand. I don't know if this is a feature or a bug.
2001-01-03 21:36:25 -04:00
2 *= [1] => [1, 1]
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
2 + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 += (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 * (2,) = (2, 2)
Sequence repeat works now for in-place multiply with an integer type as the left operand. I don't know if this is a feature or a bug.
2001-01-03 21:36:25 -04:00
2 *= (2,) => (2, 2)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
2 / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
2 + None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 += None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 - None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 * None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 / None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 % None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
2 + <MethodNumber 1> = 3
2 += <MethodNumber 1> => 3
2 - <MethodNumber 1> = 1
2 -= <MethodNumber 1> => 1
2 * <MethodNumber 1> = 2
2 *= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
2 / <MethodNumber 1> = 2
2 /= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
2 ** <MethodNumber 1> = 2
2 **= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
2 % <MethodNumber 1> = 0
2 %= <MethodNumber 1> => 0
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
2 + <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
2 += <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
2 - <CoerceNumber 2> = 0
2 -= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0
2 * <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
2 *= <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
2 / <CoerceNumber 2> = 1
2 /= <CoerceNumber 2> => 1
2 ** <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
2 **= <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
2 % <CoerceNumber 2> = 0
2 %= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0
(2+0j) + 2 = (4+0j)
(2+0j) += 2 => (4+0j)
(2+0j) - 2 = 0j
(2+0j) -= 2 => 0j
(2+0j) * 2 = (4+0j)
(2+0j) *= 2 => (4+0j)
(2+0j) / 2 = (1+0j)
(2+0j) /= 2 => (1+0j)
(2+0j) ** 2 = (4+0j)
(2+0j) **= 2 => (4+0j)
(2+0j) % 2 = 0j
(2+0j) %= 2 => 0j
(2+0j) + 4.0 = (6+0j)
(2+0j) += 4.0 => (6+0j)
(2+0j) - 4.0 = (-2+0j)
(2+0j) -= 4.0 => (-2+0j)
(2+0j) * 4.0 = (8+0j)
(2+0j) *= 4.0 => (8+0j)
(2+0j) / 4.0 = (0.5+0j)
(2+0j) /= 4.0 => (0.5+0j)
(2+0j) ** 4.0 = (16+0j)
(2+0j) **= 4.0 => (16+0j)
(2+0j) % 4.0 = (2+0j)
(2+0j) %= 4.0 => (2+0j)
(2+0j) + 2 = (4+0j)
(2+0j) += 2 => (4+0j)
(2+0j) - 2 = 0j
(2+0j) -= 2 => 0j
(2+0j) * 2 = (4+0j)
(2+0j) *= 2 => (4+0j)
(2+0j) / 2 = (1+0j)
(2+0j) /= 2 => (1+0j)
(2+0j) ** 2 = (4+0j)
(2+0j) **= 2 => (4+0j)
(2+0j) % 2 = 0j
(2+0j) %= 2 => 0j
(2+0j) + (2+0j) = (4+0j)
(2+0j) += (2+0j) => (4+0j)
(2+0j) - (2+0j) = 0j
(2+0j) -= (2+0j) => 0j
(2+0j) * (2+0j) = (4+0j)
(2+0j) *= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
(2+0j) / (2+0j) = (1+0j)
(2+0j) /= (2+0j) => (1+0j)
(2+0j) ** (2+0j) = (4+0j)
(2+0j) **= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
(2+0j) % (2+0j) = 0j
(2+0j) %= (2+0j) => 0j
(2+0j) + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) * [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) *= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) += (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) * (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) *= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) + None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) += None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) - None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) * None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) / None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) % None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2+0j) + <MethodNumber 1> = (3+0j)
(2+0j) += <MethodNumber 1> => (3+0j)
(2+0j) - <MethodNumber 1> = (1+0j)
(2+0j) -= <MethodNumber 1> => (1+0j)
(2+0j) * <MethodNumber 1> = (2+0j)
(2+0j) *= <MethodNumber 1> => (2+0j)
(2+0j) / <MethodNumber 1> = (2+0j)
(2+0j) /= <MethodNumber 1> => (2+0j)
(2+0j) ** <MethodNumber 1> = (2+0j)
(2+0j) **= <MethodNumber 1> => (2+0j)
(2+0j) % <MethodNumber 1> = 0j
(2+0j) %= <MethodNumber 1> => 0j
(2+0j) + <CoerceNumber 2> = (4+0j)
(2+0j) += <CoerceNumber 2> => (4+0j)
(2+0j) - <CoerceNumber 2> = 0j
(2+0j) -= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0j
(2+0j) * <CoerceNumber 2> = (4+0j)
(2+0j) *= <CoerceNumber 2> => (4+0j)
(2+0j) / <CoerceNumber 2> = (1+0j)
(2+0j) /= <CoerceNumber 2> => (1+0j)
(2+0j) ** <CoerceNumber 2> = (4+0j)
(2+0j) **= <CoerceNumber 2> => (4+0j)
(2+0j) % <CoerceNumber 2> = 0j
(2+0j) %= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0j
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
[1] + 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] += 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] - 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * 2 = [1, 1]
[1] *= 2 => [1, 1]
[1] / 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
[1] + 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] += 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] - 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] *= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] / 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
[1] + 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] += 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] - 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * 2 = [1, 1]
[1] *= 2 => [1, 1]
[1] / 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
[1] + (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] += (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] - (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] *= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] / (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
[1] + [1] = [1, 1]
[1] += [1] => [1, 1]
[1] - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] *= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] += (2,) => [1, 2]
[1] - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] *= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] + None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] += None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] - None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] / None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] + <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
Generalize tuple() to work nicely with iterators. NEEDS DOC CHANGES. This one surprised me! While I expected tuple() to be a no-brainer, turns out it's actually dripping with consequences: 1. It will *allow* the popular PySequence_Fast() to work with any iterable object (code for that not yet checked in, but should be trivial). 2. It caused two std tests to fail. This because some places used PyTuple_Sequence() (the C spelling of tuple()) as an indirect way to test whether something *is* a sequence. But tuple() code only looked for the existence of sq->item to determine that, and e.g. an instance passed that test whether or not it supported the other operations tuple() needed (e.g., __len__). So some things the tests *expected* to fail with an AttributeError now fail with a TypeError instead. This looks like an improvement to me; e.g., test_coercion used to produce 559 TypeErrors and 2 AttributeErrors, and now they're all TypeErrors. The error details are more informative too, because the places calling this were *looking* for TypeErrors in order to replace the generic tuple() "not a sequence" msg with their own more specific text, and AttributeErrors snuck by that.
2001-05-05 00:56:37 -03:00
[1] += <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
[1] - <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * <MethodNumber 1> = [1]
[1] *= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] / <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
[1] + <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
Generalize tuple() to work nicely with iterators. NEEDS DOC CHANGES. This one surprised me! While I expected tuple() to be a no-brainer, turns out it's actually dripping with consequences: 1. It will *allow* the popular PySequence_Fast() to work with any iterable object (code for that not yet checked in, but should be trivial). 2. It caused two std tests to fail. This because some places used PyTuple_Sequence() (the C spelling of tuple()) as an indirect way to test whether something *is* a sequence. But tuple() code only looked for the existence of sq->item to determine that, and e.g. an instance passed that test whether or not it supported the other operations tuple() needed (e.g., __len__). So some things the tests *expected* to fail with an AttributeError now fail with a TypeError instead. This looks like an improvement to me; e.g., test_coercion used to produce 559 TypeErrors and 2 AttributeErrors, and now they're all TypeErrors. The error details are more informative too, because the places calling this were *looking* for TypeErrors in order to replace the generic tuple() "not a sequence" msg with their own more specific text, and AttributeErrors snuck by that.
2001-05-05 00:56:37 -03:00
[1] += <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
[1] - <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] -= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] * <CoerceNumber 2> = [1, 1]
[1] *= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] / <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] /= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] ** <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] **= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] % <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
[1] %= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
(2,) + 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * 2 = (2, 2)
(2,) *= 2 => (2, 2)
(2,) / 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
(2,) + 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) *= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) / 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
(2,) + 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * 2 = (2, 2)
(2,) *= 2 => (2, 2)
(2,) / 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
(2,) + (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) *= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) / (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
(2,) + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) *= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) + (2,) = (2, 2)
(2,) += (2,) => (2, 2)
(2,) - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) *= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) + None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) / None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) + <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * <MethodNumber 1> = (2,)
(2,) *= <MethodNumber 1> => (2,)
(2,) / <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
(2,) + <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) += <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) - <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) -= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) * <CoerceNumber 2> = (2, 2)
(2,) *= <CoerceNumber 2> => (2, 2)
(2,) / <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) /= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) ** <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) **= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) % <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
(2,) %= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
None + 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None += 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None - 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None * 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None / 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None % 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
None + 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None += 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None - 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None * 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None / 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None % 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= 4.0 ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
None + 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None += 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None - 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None * 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None / 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None % 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= 2 ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
None + (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None += (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None - (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None * (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None / (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None % (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= (2+0j) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
None + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None * [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
None + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None += (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None * (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
None + None ... exceptions.TypeError
None += None ... exceptions.TypeError
None - None ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
None * None ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
None / None ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
None % None ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
None + <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None += <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None - <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None * <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None / <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None % <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= <MethodNumber 1> ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
None + <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None += <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None - <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None -= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None * <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None *= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None / <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None /= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None ** <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None **= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None % <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
None %= <CoerceNumber 2> ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
<MethodNumber 1> + 2 = 3
<MethodNumber 1> += 2 => 3
<MethodNumber 1> - 2 = -1
<MethodNumber 1> -= 2 => -1
<MethodNumber 1> * 2 = 2
<MethodNumber 1> *= 2 => 2
<MethodNumber 1> / 2 = 0
<MethodNumber 1> /= 2 => 0
<MethodNumber 1> ** 2 = 1
<MethodNumber 1> **= 2 => 1
<MethodNumber 1> % 2 = 1
<MethodNumber 1> %= 2 => 1
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
<MethodNumber 1> + 4.0 = 5.0
<MethodNumber 1> += 4.0 => 5.0
<MethodNumber 1> - 4.0 = -3.0
<MethodNumber 1> -= 4.0 => -3.0
<MethodNumber 1> * 4.0 = 4.0
<MethodNumber 1> *= 4.0 => 4.0
<MethodNumber 1> / 4.0 = 0.25
<MethodNumber 1> /= 4.0 => 0.25
<MethodNumber 1> ** 4.0 = 1.0
<MethodNumber 1> **= 4.0 => 1.0
<MethodNumber 1> % 4.0 = 1.0
<MethodNumber 1> %= 4.0 => 1.0
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
<MethodNumber 1> + 2 = 3
<MethodNumber 1> += 2 => 3
<MethodNumber 1> - 2 = -1
<MethodNumber 1> -= 2 => -1
<MethodNumber 1> * 2 = 2
<MethodNumber 1> *= 2 => 2
<MethodNumber 1> / 2 = 0
<MethodNumber 1> /= 2 => 0
<MethodNumber 1> ** 2 = 1
<MethodNumber 1> **= 2 => 1
<MethodNumber 1> % 2 = 1
<MethodNumber 1> %= 2 => 1
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
<MethodNumber 1> + (2+0j) = (3+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> += (2+0j) => (3+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> - (2+0j) = (-1+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> -= (2+0j) => (-1+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> * (2+0j) = (2+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> *= (2+0j) => (2+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> / (2+0j) = (0.5+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> /= (2+0j) => (0.5+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> ** (2+0j) = (1+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> **= (2+0j) => (1+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> % (2+0j) = (1+0j)
<MethodNumber 1> %= (2+0j) => (1+0j)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
<MethodNumber 1> + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> * [1] = [1]
<MethodNumber 1> *= [1] => [1]
<MethodNumber 1> / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> += (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> * (2,) = (2,)
<MethodNumber 1> *= (2,) => (2,)
<MethodNumber 1> / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> + None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> += None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> - None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> * None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> / None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> % None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<MethodNumber 1> + <MethodNumber 1> = 2
<MethodNumber 1> += <MethodNumber 1> => 2
<MethodNumber 1> - <MethodNumber 1> = 0
<MethodNumber 1> -= <MethodNumber 1> => 0
<MethodNumber 1> * <MethodNumber 1> = 1
<MethodNumber 1> *= <MethodNumber 1> => 1
<MethodNumber 1> / <MethodNumber 1> = 1
<MethodNumber 1> /= <MethodNumber 1> => 1
<MethodNumber 1> ** <MethodNumber 1> = 1
<MethodNumber 1> **= <MethodNumber 1> => 1
<MethodNumber 1> % <MethodNumber 1> = 0
<MethodNumber 1> %= <MethodNumber 1> => 0
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
<MethodNumber 1> + <CoerceNumber 2> = 3
<MethodNumber 1> += <CoerceNumber 2> => 3
<MethodNumber 1> - <CoerceNumber 2> = -1
<MethodNumber 1> -= <CoerceNumber 2> => -1
<MethodNumber 1> * <CoerceNumber 2> = 2
<MethodNumber 1> *= <CoerceNumber 2> => 2
<MethodNumber 1> / <CoerceNumber 2> = 0
<MethodNumber 1> /= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0
<MethodNumber 1> ** <CoerceNumber 2> = 1
<MethodNumber 1> **= <CoerceNumber 2> => 1
<MethodNumber 1> % <CoerceNumber 2> = 1
<MethodNumber 1> %= <CoerceNumber 2> => 1
<CoerceNumber 2> + 2 = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> += 2 => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> - 2 = 0
<CoerceNumber 2> -= 2 => 0
<CoerceNumber 2> * 2 = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> *= 2 => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> / 2 = 1
<CoerceNumber 2> /= 2 => 1
<CoerceNumber 2> ** 2 = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> **= 2 => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> % 2 = 0
<CoerceNumber 2> %= 2 => 0
<CoerceNumber 2> + 4.0 = 6.0
<CoerceNumber 2> += 4.0 => 6.0
<CoerceNumber 2> - 4.0 = -2.0
<CoerceNumber 2> -= 4.0 => -2.0
<CoerceNumber 2> * 4.0 = 8.0
<CoerceNumber 2> *= 4.0 => 8.0
<CoerceNumber 2> / 4.0 = 0.5
<CoerceNumber 2> /= 4.0 => 0.5
<CoerceNumber 2> ** 4.0 = 16.0
<CoerceNumber 2> **= 4.0 => 16.0
<CoerceNumber 2> % 4.0 = 2.0
<CoerceNumber 2> %= 4.0 => 2.0
<CoerceNumber 2> + 2 = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> += 2 => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> - 2 = 0
<CoerceNumber 2> -= 2 => 0
<CoerceNumber 2> * 2 = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> *= 2 => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> / 2 = 1
<CoerceNumber 2> /= 2 => 1
<CoerceNumber 2> ** 2 = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> **= 2 => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> % 2 = 0
<CoerceNumber 2> %= 2 => 0
<CoerceNumber 2> + (2+0j) = (4+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> += (2+0j) => (4+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> - (2+0j) = 0j
<CoerceNumber 2> -= (2+0j) => 0j
<CoerceNumber 2> * (2+0j) = (4+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> *= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> / (2+0j) = (1+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> /= (2+0j) => (1+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> ** (2+0j) = (4+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> **= (2+0j) => (4+0j)
<CoerceNumber 2> % (2+0j) = 0j
<CoerceNumber 2> %= (2+0j) => 0j
<CoerceNumber 2> + [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> += [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> - [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> -= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> * [1] = [1, 1]
<CoerceNumber 2> *= [1] => [1, 1]
<CoerceNumber 2> / [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> /= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> ** [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> **= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> % [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> %= [1] ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> + (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> += (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> - (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> -= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> * (2,) = (2, 2)
<CoerceNumber 2> *= (2,) => (2, 2)
<CoerceNumber 2> / (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> /= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> ** (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> **= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> % (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> %= (2,) ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> + None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> += None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> - None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> -= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> * None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> *= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> / None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> /= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> ** None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> **= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> % None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> %= None ... exceptions.TypeError
<CoerceNumber 2> + <MethodNumber 1> = 3
<CoerceNumber 2> += <MethodNumber 1> => 3
<CoerceNumber 2> - <MethodNumber 1> = 1
<CoerceNumber 2> -= <MethodNumber 1> => 1
<CoerceNumber 2> * <MethodNumber 1> = 2
<CoerceNumber 2> *= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
<CoerceNumber 2> / <MethodNumber 1> = 2
<CoerceNumber 2> /= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
<CoerceNumber 2> ** <MethodNumber 1> = 2
<CoerceNumber 2> **= <MethodNumber 1> => 2
<CoerceNumber 2> % <MethodNumber 1> = 0
<CoerceNumber 2> %= <MethodNumber 1> => 0
<CoerceNumber 2> + <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> += <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> - <CoerceNumber 2> = 0
<CoerceNumber 2> -= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0
<CoerceNumber 2> * <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> *= <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> / <CoerceNumber 2> = 1
<CoerceNumber 2> /= <CoerceNumber 2> => 1
<CoerceNumber 2> ** <CoerceNumber 2> = 4
<CoerceNumber 2> **= <CoerceNumber 2> => 4
<CoerceNumber 2> % <CoerceNumber 2> = 0
<CoerceNumber 2> %= <CoerceNumber 2> => 0
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(2, 2) = (1, 0)
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(2, 4.0) = (0.0, 2.0)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(2, 2) = (1L, 0L)
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(2, (2+0j)) = ((1+0j), 0j)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(2, [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(2, (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(2, None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(2, <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(2, <CoerceNumber 2>) = (1, 0)
divmod(4.0, 2) = (2.0, 0.0)
divmod(4.0, 4.0) = (1.0, 0.0)
divmod(4.0, 2) = (2.0, 0.0)
divmod(4.0, (2+0j)) = ((2+0j), 0j)
divmod(4.0, [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(4.0, (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(4.0, None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(4.0, <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(4.0, <CoerceNumber 2>) = (2.0, 0.0)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(2, 2) = (1L, 0L)
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(2, 4.0) = (0.0, 2.0)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(2, 2) = (1L, 0L)
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(2, (2+0j)) = ((1+0j), 0j)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(2, [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(2, (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(2, None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(2, <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(2, <CoerceNumber 2>) = (1L, 0L)
divmod((2+0j), 2) = ((1+0j), 0j)
divmod((2+0j), 4.0) = (0j, (2+0j))
divmod((2+0j), 2) = ((1+0j), 0j)
divmod((2+0j), (2+0j)) = ((1+0j), 0j)
divmod((2+0j), [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod((2+0j), (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod((2+0j), None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod((2+0j), <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod((2+0j), <CoerceNumber 2>) = ((1+0j), 0j)
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod([1], 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod([1], 4.0) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod([1], 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod([1], (2+0j)) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod([1], [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod([1], (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod([1], None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod([1], <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod([1], <CoerceNumber 2>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod((2,), 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod((2,), 4.0) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod((2,), 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod((2,), (2+0j)) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod((2,), [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod((2,), (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod((2,), None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod((2,), <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod((2,), <CoerceNumber 2>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(None, 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(None, 4.0) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(None, 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(None, (2+0j)) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(None, [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(None, (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(None, None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(None, <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(None, <CoerceNumber 2>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, 4.0) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, 2) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, (2+0j)) ... exceptions.TypeError
Add more tests for compare and coercion in preparation for the coercion overhaul. Closes SF patch #102878.
2001-01-02 12:30:31 -04:00
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
Use numbers that can be accurately represented on binary machines. I hope this works on all platforms.
2001-01-02 21:52:11 -04:00
divmod(<MethodNumber 1>, <CoerceNumber 2>) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, 2) = (1, 0)
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, 4.0) = (0.0, 2.0)
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, 2) = (1L, 0L)
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, (2+0j)) = ((1+0j), 0j)
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, [1]) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, (2,)) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, None) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, <MethodNumber 1>) ... exceptions.TypeError
divmod(<CoerceNumber 2>, <CoerceNumber 2>) = (1, 0)