2002-12-23 12:30:00 -04:00
|
|
|
"""Utilities to support packages."""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
import sys
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
import imp
|
|
|
|
import os.path
|
|
|
|
from types import ModuleType
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
__all__ = [
|
|
|
|
'get_importer', 'iter_importers', 'get_loader', 'find_loader',
|
2011-05-25 13:11:24 -03:00
|
|
|
'walk_packages', 'iter_modules', 'get_data',
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
'ImpImporter', 'ImpLoader', 'read_code', 'extend_path',
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def read_code(stream):
|
|
|
|
# This helper is needed in order for the PEP 302 emulation to
|
|
|
|
# correctly handle compiled files
|
|
|
|
import marshal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
magic = stream.read(4)
|
|
|
|
if magic != imp.get_magic():
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stream.read(4) # Skip timestamp
|
|
|
|
return marshal.load(stream)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
def simplegeneric(func):
|
|
|
|
"""Make a trivial single-dispatch generic function"""
|
|
|
|
registry = {}
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
def wrapper(*args, **kw):
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
ob = args[0]
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
cls = ob.__class__
|
|
|
|
except AttributeError:
|
|
|
|
cls = type(ob)
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
mro = cls.__mro__
|
|
|
|
except AttributeError:
|
|
|
|
try:
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
class cls(cls, object):
|
|
|
|
pass
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
mro = cls.__mro__[1:]
|
|
|
|
except TypeError:
|
2006-04-18 14:32:12 -03:00
|
|
|
mro = object, # must be an ExtensionClass or some such :(
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
for t in mro:
|
|
|
|
if t in registry:
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
return registry[t](*args, **kw)
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
else:
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
return func(*args, **kw)
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
wrapper.__name__ = func.__name__
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
except (TypeError, AttributeError):
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
pass # Python 2.3 doesn't allow functions to be renamed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def register(typ, func=None):
|
|
|
|
if func is None:
|
|
|
|
return lambda f: register(typ, f)
|
|
|
|
registry[typ] = func
|
|
|
|
return func
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wrapper.__dict__ = func.__dict__
|
|
|
|
wrapper.__doc__ = func.__doc__
|
|
|
|
wrapper.register = register
|
2006-04-18 14:32:12 -03:00
|
|
|
return wrapper
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def walk_packages(path=None, prefix='', onerror=None):
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
"""Yields (module_loader, name, ispkg) for all modules recursively
|
|
|
|
on path, or, if path is None, all accessible modules.
|
2006-07-25 19:30:24 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
'path' should be either None or a list of paths to look for
|
|
|
|
modules in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'prefix' is a string to output on the front of every module name
|
|
|
|
on output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this function must import all *packages* (NOT all
|
|
|
|
modules!) on the given path, in order to access the __path__
|
|
|
|
attribute to find submodules.
|
2006-07-25 19:30:24 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
'onerror' is a function which gets called with one argument (the
|
2006-07-26 16:48:27 -03:00
|
|
|
name of the package which was being imported) if any exception
|
|
|
|
occurs while trying to import a package. If no onerror function is
|
|
|
|
supplied, ImportErrors are caught and ignored, while all other
|
|
|
|
exceptions are propagated, terminating the search.
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
2006-07-26 16:48:27 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# list all modules python can access
|
2006-07-26 20:23:15 -03:00
|
|
|
walk_packages()
|
2006-07-26 16:48:27 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# list all submodules of ctypes
|
|
|
|
walk_packages(ctypes.__path__, ctypes.__name__+'.')
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
"""
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
def seen(p, m={}):
|
|
|
|
if p in m:
|
|
|
|
return True
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
m[p] = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for importer, name, ispkg in iter_modules(path, prefix):
|
|
|
|
yield importer, name, ispkg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ispkg:
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
__import__(name)
|
|
|
|
except ImportError:
|
|
|
|
if onerror is not None:
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
onerror(name)
|
2006-07-26 16:48:27 -03:00
|
|
|
except Exception:
|
|
|
|
if onerror is not None:
|
|
|
|
onerror(name)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
raise
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
path = getattr(sys.modules[name], '__path__', None) or []
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# don't traverse path items we've seen before
|
|
|
|
path = [p for p in path if not seen(p)]
|
|
|
|
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
for item in walk_packages(path, name+'.', onerror):
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
yield item
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def iter_modules(path=None, prefix=''):
|
2006-07-25 07:22:34 -03:00
|
|
|
"""Yields (module_loader, name, ispkg) for all submodules on path,
|
|
|
|
or, if path is None, all top-level modules on sys.path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'path' should be either None or a list of paths to look for
|
|
|
|
modules in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'prefix' is a string to output on the front of every module name
|
|
|
|
on output.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
2006-07-25 19:30:24 -03:00
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
if path is None:
|
|
|
|
importers = iter_importers()
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
importers = map(get_importer, path)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yielded = {}
|
|
|
|
for i in importers:
|
|
|
|
for name, ispkg in iter_importer_modules(i, prefix):
|
|
|
|
if name not in yielded:
|
|
|
|
yielded[name] = 1
|
|
|
|
yield i, name, ispkg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#@simplegeneric
|
|
|
|
def iter_importer_modules(importer, prefix=''):
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
if not hasattr(importer, 'iter_modules'):
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
return []
|
|
|
|
return importer.iter_modules(prefix)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iter_importer_modules = simplegeneric(iter_importer_modules)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
class ImpImporter:
|
|
|
|
"""PEP 302 Importer that wraps Python's "classic" import algorithm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ImpImporter(dirname) produces a PEP 302 importer that searches that
|
|
|
|
directory. ImpImporter(None) produces a PEP 302 importer that searches
|
|
|
|
the current sys.path, plus any modules that are frozen or built-in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that ImpImporter does not currently support being used by placement
|
|
|
|
on sys.meta_path.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, path=None):
|
|
|
|
self.path = path
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def find_module(self, fullname, path=None):
|
|
|
|
# Note: we ignore 'path' argument since it is only used via meta_path
|
|
|
|
subname = fullname.split(".")[-1]
|
|
|
|
if subname != fullname and self.path is None:
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
if self.path is None:
|
|
|
|
path = None
|
|
|
|
else:
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
path = [os.path.realpath(self.path)]
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
file, filename, etc = imp.find_module(subname, path)
|
|
|
|
except ImportError:
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
return ImpLoader(fullname, file, filename, etc)
|
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
def iter_modules(self, prefix=''):
|
|
|
|
if self.path is None or not os.path.isdir(self.path):
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yielded = {}
|
|
|
|
import inspect
|
2011-10-06 18:17:47 -03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
filenames = os.listdir(self.path)
|
|
|
|
except OSError:
|
|
|
|
# ignore unreadable directories like import does
|
|
|
|
filenames = []
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
filenames.sort() # handle packages before same-named modules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for fn in filenames:
|
|
|
|
modname = inspect.getmodulename(fn)
|
|
|
|
if modname=='__init__' or modname in yielded:
|
|
|
|
continue
|
2006-04-18 14:32:12 -03:00
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
path = os.path.join(self.path, fn)
|
|
|
|
ispkg = False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if not modname and os.path.isdir(path) and '.' not in fn:
|
|
|
|
modname = fn
|
2011-10-06 18:17:47 -03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
dircontents = os.listdir(path)
|
|
|
|
except OSError:
|
|
|
|
# ignore unreadable directories like import does
|
|
|
|
dircontents = []
|
|
|
|
for fn in dircontents:
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
subname = inspect.getmodulename(fn)
|
|
|
|
if subname=='__init__':
|
|
|
|
ispkg = True
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
continue # not a package
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if modname and '.' not in modname:
|
|
|
|
yielded[modname] = 1
|
|
|
|
yield prefix + modname, ispkg
|
|
|
|
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ImpLoader:
|
|
|
|
"""PEP 302 Loader that wraps Python's "classic" import algorithm
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
code = source = None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, fullname, file, filename, etc):
|
|
|
|
self.file = file
|
|
|
|
self.filename = filename
|
|
|
|
self.fullname = fullname
|
|
|
|
self.etc = etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def load_module(self, fullname):
|
|
|
|
self._reopen()
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
mod = imp.load_module(fullname, self.file, self.filename, self.etc)
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
if self.file:
|
|
|
|
self.file.close()
|
|
|
|
# Note: we don't set __loader__ because we want the module to look
|
|
|
|
# normal; i.e. this is just a wrapper for standard import machinery
|
|
|
|
return mod
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_data(self, pathname):
|
2017-10-09 11:55:54 -03:00
|
|
|
with open(pathname, "rb") as file:
|
|
|
|
return file.read()
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _reopen(self):
|
|
|
|
if self.file and self.file.closed:
|
2006-06-11 04:26:27 -03:00
|
|
|
mod_type = self.etc[2]
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
if mod_type==imp.PY_SOURCE:
|
|
|
|
self.file = open(self.filename, 'rU')
|
|
|
|
elif mod_type in (imp.PY_COMPILED, imp.C_EXTENSION):
|
|
|
|
self.file = open(self.filename, 'rb')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _fix_name(self, fullname):
|
|
|
|
if fullname is None:
|
|
|
|
fullname = self.fullname
|
|
|
|
elif fullname != self.fullname:
|
|
|
|
raise ImportError("Loader for module %s cannot handle "
|
|
|
|
"module %s" % (self.fullname, fullname))
|
|
|
|
return fullname
|
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
def is_package(self, fullname):
|
|
|
|
fullname = self._fix_name(fullname)
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
return self.etc[2]==imp.PKG_DIRECTORY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_code(self, fullname=None):
|
|
|
|
fullname = self._fix_name(fullname)
|
|
|
|
if self.code is None:
|
|
|
|
mod_type = self.etc[2]
|
|
|
|
if mod_type==imp.PY_SOURCE:
|
|
|
|
source = self.get_source(fullname)
|
|
|
|
self.code = compile(source, self.filename, 'exec')
|
|
|
|
elif mod_type==imp.PY_COMPILED:
|
|
|
|
self._reopen()
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
self.code = read_code(self.file)
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
self.file.close()
|
|
|
|
elif mod_type==imp.PKG_DIRECTORY:
|
|
|
|
self.code = self._get_delegate().get_code()
|
|
|
|
return self.code
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_source(self, fullname=None):
|
|
|
|
fullname = self._fix_name(fullname)
|
|
|
|
if self.source is None:
|
|
|
|
mod_type = self.etc[2]
|
|
|
|
if mod_type==imp.PY_SOURCE:
|
|
|
|
self._reopen()
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
self.source = self.file.read()
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
self.file.close()
|
|
|
|
elif mod_type==imp.PY_COMPILED:
|
|
|
|
if os.path.exists(self.filename[:-1]):
|
|
|
|
f = open(self.filename[:-1], 'rU')
|
|
|
|
self.source = f.read()
|
|
|
|
f.close()
|
|
|
|
elif mod_type==imp.PKG_DIRECTORY:
|
|
|
|
self.source = self._get_delegate().get_source()
|
|
|
|
return self.source
|
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
def _get_delegate(self):
|
|
|
|
return ImpImporter(self.filename).find_module('__init__')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_filename(self, fullname=None):
|
|
|
|
fullname = self._fix_name(fullname)
|
|
|
|
mod_type = self.etc[2]
|
|
|
|
if self.etc[2]==imp.PKG_DIRECTORY:
|
|
|
|
return self._get_delegate().get_filename()
|
|
|
|
elif self.etc[2] in (imp.PY_SOURCE, imp.PY_COMPILED, imp.C_EXTENSION):
|
|
|
|
return self.filename
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
import zipimport
|
|
|
|
from zipimport import zipimporter
|
2006-04-18 14:32:12 -03:00
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
def iter_zipimport_modules(importer, prefix=''):
|
|
|
|
dirlist = zipimport._zip_directory_cache[importer.archive].keys()
|
|
|
|
dirlist.sort()
|
|
|
|
_prefix = importer.prefix
|
|
|
|
plen = len(_prefix)
|
|
|
|
yielded = {}
|
|
|
|
import inspect
|
|
|
|
for fn in dirlist:
|
|
|
|
if not fn.startswith(_prefix):
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn = fn[plen:].split(os.sep)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(fn)==2 and fn[1].startswith('__init__.py'):
|
|
|
|
if fn[0] not in yielded:
|
|
|
|
yielded[fn[0]] = 1
|
|
|
|
yield fn[0], True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if len(fn)!=1:
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
modname = inspect.getmodulename(fn[0])
|
|
|
|
if modname=='__init__':
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if modname and '.' not in modname and modname not in yielded:
|
|
|
|
yielded[modname] = 1
|
|
|
|
yield prefix + modname, False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iter_importer_modules.register(zipimporter, iter_zipimport_modules)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except ImportError:
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
def get_importer(path_item):
|
|
|
|
"""Retrieve a PEP 302 importer for the given path item
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The returned importer is cached in sys.path_importer_cache
|
|
|
|
if it was newly created by a path hook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If there is no importer, a wrapper around the basic import
|
|
|
|
machinery is returned. This wrapper is never inserted into
|
|
|
|
the importer cache (None is inserted instead).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cache (or part of it) can be cleared manually if a
|
|
|
|
rescan of sys.path_hooks is necessary.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
importer = sys.path_importer_cache[path_item]
|
|
|
|
except KeyError:
|
|
|
|
for path_hook in sys.path_hooks:
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
importer = path_hook(path_item)
|
|
|
|
break
|
|
|
|
except ImportError:
|
|
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
importer = None
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
sys.path_importer_cache.setdefault(path_item, importer)
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
|
2006-07-28 18:12:07 -03:00
|
|
|
if importer is None:
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
importer = ImpImporter(path_item)
|
|
|
|
except ImportError:
|
2006-05-26 15:03:31 -03:00
|
|
|
importer = None
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
return importer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
pydoc now supports PEP 302 importers, by way of utility functions in
pkgutil, such as 'walk_packages()'. It will properly document
modules that are in zip files, and is backward compatible to Python
2.3 (setuptools installs for Python <2.5 will bundle it so pydoc
doesn't break when used with eggs.)
What has not changed is that pydoc command line options do not support
zip paths or other importer paths, and the webserver index does not
support sys.meta_path. Those are probably okay as limitations.
Tasks remaining: write docs and Misc/NEWS for pkgutil/pydoc changes,
and update setuptools to use pkgutil wherever possible, then add it
to the stdlib.
2006-04-17 21:59:55 -03:00
|
|
|
def iter_importers(fullname=""):
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
"""Yield PEP 302 importers for the given module name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If fullname contains a '.', the importers will be for the package
|
|
|
|
containing fullname, otherwise they will be importers for sys.meta_path,
|
|
|
|
sys.path, and Python's "classic" import machinery, in that order. If
|
|
|
|
the named module is in a package, that package is imported as a side
|
|
|
|
effect of invoking this function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non PEP 302 mechanisms (e.g. the Windows registry) used by the
|
|
|
|
standard import machinery to find files in alternative locations
|
|
|
|
are partially supported, but are searched AFTER sys.path. Normally,
|
|
|
|
these locations are searched BEFORE sys.path, preventing sys.path
|
|
|
|
entries from shadowing them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For this to cause a visible difference in behaviour, there must
|
|
|
|
be a module or package name that is accessible via both sys.path
|
|
|
|
and one of the non PEP 302 file system mechanisms. In this case,
|
|
|
|
the emulation will find the former version, while the builtin
|
|
|
|
import mechanism will find the latter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items of the following types can be affected by this discrepancy:
|
|
|
|
imp.C_EXTENSION, imp.PY_SOURCE, imp.PY_COMPILED, imp.PKG_DIRECTORY
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
if fullname.startswith('.'):
|
|
|
|
raise ImportError("Relative module names not supported")
|
|
|
|
if '.' in fullname:
|
|
|
|
# Get the containing package's __path__
|
|
|
|
pkg = '.'.join(fullname.split('.')[:-1])
|
|
|
|
if pkg not in sys.modules:
|
|
|
|
__import__(pkg)
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
path = getattr(sys.modules[pkg], '__path__', None) or []
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
for importer in sys.meta_path:
|
|
|
|
yield importer
|
|
|
|
path = sys.path
|
|
|
|
for item in path:
|
|
|
|
yield get_importer(item)
|
|
|
|
if '.' not in fullname:
|
|
|
|
yield ImpImporter()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_loader(module_or_name):
|
|
|
|
"""Get a PEP 302 "loader" object for module_or_name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the module or package is accessible via the normal import
|
|
|
|
mechanism, a wrapper around the relevant part of that machinery
|
|
|
|
is returned. Returns None if the module cannot be found or imported.
|
|
|
|
If the named module is not already imported, its containing package
|
|
|
|
(if any) is imported, in order to establish the package __path__.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This function uses iter_importers(), and is thus subject to the same
|
|
|
|
limitations regarding platform-specific special import locations such
|
|
|
|
as the Windows registry.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
if module_or_name in sys.modules:
|
|
|
|
module_or_name = sys.modules[module_or_name]
|
|
|
|
if isinstance(module_or_name, ModuleType):
|
|
|
|
module = module_or_name
|
2006-04-28 01:32:20 -03:00
|
|
|
loader = getattr(module, '__loader__', None)
|
First phase of refactoring for runpy, pkgutil, pydoc, and setuptools
to share common PEP 302 support code, as described here:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-April/063724.html
This revision strips all the PEP 302 emulation code from runpy,
replacing it with published API classes and functions in pkgutil,
mostly using setuptools' implementation of common functionality,
but adding features from runpy, and doing some refactoring to make
the layer pydoc needs easier to implement on top of this.
One step down, four to go, although step #4 (adding C versions of
the new APIs to 'imp') may not be able to make it in time for
alpha 2. We'll see how that goes.
2006-04-17 17:17:25 -03:00
|
|
|
if loader is not None:
|
|
|
|
return loader
|
|
|
|
fullname = module.__name__
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
fullname = module_or_name
|
|
|
|
return find_loader(fullname)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def find_loader(fullname):
|
|
|
|
"""Find a PEP 302 "loader" object for fullname
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If fullname contains dots, path must be the containing package's __path__.
|
|
|
|
Returns None if the module cannot be found or imported. This function uses
|
|
|
|
iter_importers(), and is thus subject to the same limitations regarding
|
|
|
|
platform-specific special import locations such as the Windows registry.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
for importer in iter_importers(fullname):
|
|
|
|
loader = importer.find_module(fullname)
|
|
|
|
if loader is not None:
|
|
|
|
return loader
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
2002-12-23 12:30:00 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def extend_path(path, name):
|
|
|
|
"""Extend a package's path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intended use is to place the following code in a package's __init__.py:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from pkgutil import extend_path
|
|
|
|
__path__ = extend_path(__path__, __name__)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will add to the package's __path__ all subdirectories of
|
|
|
|
directories on sys.path named after the package. This is useful
|
|
|
|
if one wants to distribute different parts of a single logical
|
|
|
|
package as multiple directories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It also looks for *.pkg files beginning where * matches the name
|
|
|
|
argument. This feature is similar to *.pth files (see site.py),
|
|
|
|
except that it doesn't special-case lines starting with 'import'.
|
|
|
|
A *.pkg file is trusted at face value: apart from checking for
|
|
|
|
duplicates, all entries found in a *.pkg file are added to the
|
|
|
|
path, regardless of whether they are exist the filesystem. (This
|
|
|
|
is a feature.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the input path is not a list (as is the case for frozen
|
|
|
|
packages) it is returned unchanged. The input path is not
|
|
|
|
modified; an extended copy is returned. Items are only appended
|
|
|
|
to the copy at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is assumed that sys.path is a sequence. Items of sys.path that
|
|
|
|
are not (unicode or 8-bit) strings referring to existing
|
|
|
|
directories are ignored. Unicode items of sys.path that cause
|
|
|
|
errors when used as filenames may cause this function to raise an
|
|
|
|
exception (in line with os.path.isdir() behavior).
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if not isinstance(path, list):
|
|
|
|
# This could happen e.g. when this is called from inside a
|
|
|
|
# frozen package. Return the path unchanged in that case.
|
|
|
|
return path
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pname = os.path.join(*name.split('.')) # Reconstitute as relative path
|
|
|
|
# Just in case os.extsep != '.'
|
|
|
|
sname = os.extsep.join(name.split('.'))
|
|
|
|
sname_pkg = sname + os.extsep + "pkg"
|
|
|
|
init_py = "__init__" + os.extsep + "py"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
path = path[:] # Start with a copy of the existing path
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for dir in sys.path:
|
2003-09-17 02:50:59 -03:00
|
|
|
if not isinstance(dir, basestring) or not os.path.isdir(dir):
|
2002-12-23 12:30:00 -04:00
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
subdir = os.path.join(dir, pname)
|
|
|
|
# XXX This may still add duplicate entries to path on
|
|
|
|
# case-insensitive filesystems
|
|
|
|
initfile = os.path.join(subdir, init_py)
|
|
|
|
if subdir not in path and os.path.isfile(initfile):
|
|
|
|
path.append(subdir)
|
|
|
|
# XXX Is this the right thing for subpackages like zope.app?
|
|
|
|
# It looks for a file named "zope.app.pkg"
|
|
|
|
pkgfile = os.path.join(dir, sname_pkg)
|
|
|
|
if os.path.isfile(pkgfile):
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
f = open(pkgfile)
|
|
|
|
except IOError, msg:
|
|
|
|
sys.stderr.write("Can't open %s: %s\n" %
|
|
|
|
(pkgfile, msg))
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
for line in f:
|
|
|
|
line = line.rstrip('\n')
|
|
|
|
if not line or line.startswith('#'):
|
|
|
|
continue
|
|
|
|
path.append(line) # Don't check for existence!
|
|
|
|
f.close()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return path
|
2008-04-15 07:25:31 -03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_data(package, resource):
|
|
|
|
"""Get a resource from a package.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a wrapper round the PEP 302 loader get_data API. The package
|
|
|
|
argument should be the name of a package, in standard module format
|
|
|
|
(foo.bar). The resource argument should be in the form of a relative
|
|
|
|
filename, using '/' as the path separator. The parent directory name '..'
|
|
|
|
is not allowed, and nor is a rooted name (starting with a '/').
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The function returns a binary string, which is the contents of the
|
|
|
|
specified resource.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For packages located in the filesystem, which have already been imported,
|
|
|
|
this is the rough equivalent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d = os.path.dirname(sys.modules[package].__file__)
|
|
|
|
data = open(os.path.join(d, resource), 'rb').read()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the package cannot be located or loaded, or it uses a PEP 302 loader
|
|
|
|
which does not support get_data(), then None is returned.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loader = get_loader(package)
|
|
|
|
if loader is None or not hasattr(loader, 'get_data'):
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
mod = sys.modules.get(package) or loader.load_module(package)
|
|
|
|
if mod is None or not hasattr(mod, '__file__'):
|
|
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Modify the resource name to be compatible with the loader.get_data
|
|
|
|
# signature - an os.path format "filename" starting with the dirname of
|
|
|
|
# the package's __file__
|
|
|
|
parts = resource.split('/')
|
|
|
|
parts.insert(0, os.path.dirname(mod.__file__))
|
|
|
|
resource_name = os.path.join(*parts)
|
|
|
|
return loader.get_data(resource_name)
|